A comparative network analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the era of hybridization

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 170-191

  Chung, Chung Joo ^a   Lee, Sungjoon ^a   Barnett, George A ^a   Kim, Jang Hyun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

International communication association; Korean society for journalism and communication studies; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249083263     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292980902827003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ahn, M. (2005). Communication theory matrix of KJJCS, 1995-2004. Communication Theory (Korean), 1, 35-62.
2. Ahn, M. (2006). An empirical examination of communication theory networks: Focusing on the co-occurrence patterns in the research articles of JOC, HCR, KJJCS, 1999-2004. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 50, 162-191.
3. Avery, R.K., & McCain, T.A. (1982). Interpersonal and mediated encounters: A reorientation to the communication process. In G. Gumpertz & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 121-131). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Barnett, G.A. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, 19781996. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1638-1655.
5. Barnett, G.A., & Danowski, J.A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19, 264-285.
6. Beniger, J.R. (1990). Identifying the important theorists of communication: Use of latent measures to test manifest assumptions in scholarly communication. In C. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 254-277). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Berger, C., & Chaffee, S. (1988). Bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 311-318.
8. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.
9. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
10. Cappell, C.L., & Guterbock, T.M. (1992). Visible colleges: The social and conceptual structure of sociology specialties. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 266-273.
11. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
12. Chon, B., & Han, S. (2007). Citation networks in Korean communication journals. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 51, 197-215.
13. Comrey, A.L. (1962). The minimal residual method of factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 11, 15-18.
14. Craig, R.T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
15. Craig, R.T. (2003, November). Discursive origins of a communication discipline. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL.
16. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Doerfel, M.L., & Barnett, G.A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25, 589-603.
18. Ennis, J.G. (1992). The social organization of sociological knowledge: Modeling the intersection of specialties. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 259-265.
19. Feeley, T.H. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34, 505-520.
20. Frederick, H. (1993). Global communication and international relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. Funkhouser, E.T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
22. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23. Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
24. ICA. (2008). Who is a member of ICA? Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.ica hdq.org/faqs/whoica.asp
25. Iwabuchi, K. (2001). Uses of Japanese popular culture: Trans/nationalism and postcolonial desire for 'Asia'. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media and Composite Cultures, 11(2), 199-222.
26. Kim, H.J., & Barnett, G.A. (2008, August). Social network analysis using author co-citation data. Proceedings of the fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada.
27. Kim, Y., & Kim, C. (2007). Mapping the intellectual structure of communication research field in Korea: An author co-citation analysis, 1989-2006. Communication Research, 15, 155-184.
28. KSJCS. (2008). Organization of KSJCS. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.ksjcs.or.kr/ksjcs/commitee.asp
29. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Lau, T.Y. (1995). Chinese communication studies: A citation analysis of Chinese communication research in English-language journals. Scientometrics, 33, 65-91.
32. Lee, S.J., & Barnett, G.A. (2006, May). The structural change in Communication between 1991 and 2005: A social and semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
33. Lim, Y. (1998). Factionalism and identity crisis of communication principle in Korea. Korean Journal of Journalism and Information, 11, 3-31.
34. Paisley, W. (1984). Communication in the communication science. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 1-43). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Paisley, W. (1990). An oasis where many trails cross: The improbable cocitation networks of a multidiscipline. Journal of the America Society for Information Science, 41, 459-468.
36. Parker, E., Paisley, W., & Garrett, R. (1964). Bibliographic citations as unobtrusive measures of scientific communication. Stanford, CA: Institute for Communication Research.
37. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press.
38. Pieterse, J.N. (1995). Globalization as hybridization. In M. Featherstone, S. Larsh, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 45-68). London: Sage.
39. Reeves, B., & Borgman, C.L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
40. Rice, R.E., Borgman, C., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 19771985: Cliques and positions, citation made and citation received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.
41. Rogers, E.M., & Chaffee, S.H. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33, 18-30.
42. Rogers, E.M., & Chaffee, S.H. (1993). The past and the future of communication study: Convergence or divergence? Journal of Communication, 43, 125-131.
43. Rogers, E.M., & Kincaid, D.L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
44. Rosengren, E. (1993). From field to frog ponds. Journal of Communication, 43, 6-34.
45. Rush, R.R., & Kent, K.E.M. (1977). International communication as a field: A study of Journalism Quarterly citations. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 284-303.
46. Snyder, H., Cronin, B., & Davenport, E. (1995). What's the use of citation? Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences. Journal of Information Science, 21, 75-85.
47. So, C.Y.K. (1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the development status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-255.
48. Stephen, T. (1999). Computer-assisted concept analysis of HCR's first 25 years. Human Communication Research, 25, 498-513.
49. Straubhaar, J.D. (2002). (Re)asserting national media and national identity against the global, regional and local levels of world television. In J.M. Chan & B.T. McIntyre (Eds.), In search of boundaries: Communication, nation-states, and cultural identities. Westport, CT: Ablex.
50. Tankard, J.K., Chang, T.K., & Tsang, K.J. (1984). Citation networks as indicators of journalism research activity. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 89-96.
51. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
52. Ward, J.H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.
53. White, H.C., Boorman, S., & Breiger, R.L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-780.
54. Whitley, R.R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Wiemann, J.M., Hawkins, R.P., & Pingree, S. (1988). Fragmentation in the field and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 304-310.
56. Wispe, L., & Osborn, C. (1982). Citation patterns in communication: A study of interdisciplinary influences. ACA Bulletin, 42, 32-39.
57. Woelfel, J., & Fink, E.L. (1980). The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and methods. New York: Academic.
58. Yang, S. (1999). The institutionalization and paradigm change of journalism study. Journalism and Information, 5, 67-103.
59. Yang, S. (2005). The institutionalization of journalism study in Korea. Communication Theory, 1, 1-34.