Citations among Communication journals and other disciplines: A network analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 449-469

  Barnett, George A ^a   Huh, Catherine ^a   Kim, Youngju ^a   Park, Han Woo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Communication; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959644814     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0381-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barnett, G. A., & Danowski, J. A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19, 264-285.
2. Barnett, G. A., Danowski, J. A., Feeley, T. H., & Stalker, J. (2010). Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns. Journal of Communication, 60, 388-411.
3. Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. (1988). Bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 311-318.
4. Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2009). What is communication science. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.
6. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Netdraw network visualization. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
8. Chung, C. J., Lee, S., Barnett, G. A., & Kim, J. H. (2009). A comparative network analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the era of hybridization. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(2), 170-191.
9. Craig, R. T. (1993). Why are there so many communication theories? Journal of Communication, 43(3), 26-33.
10. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161.
11. Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. In S. H. Chaffee & C. R. Berger (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 20-98). Bevery Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
13. Freeman, I. (2004). The developmental of social network analysis: A study of the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
14. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
15. Garfield, E. (2006). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 1123-1127.
16. Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241-254.
17. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation. Scientometrics, 43, 5-25.
18. Leydesdorff, L. (2007).Betweenness centrality" as an indicator of the "interdisciplinarity" of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1309.
19. Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
20. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics, 81(1), 157-175.
22. Parker, E. B., Paisley, W., & Garrett, R. (1967). Bibliographic citations as unobtrusive measures of scientific communication. Stanford, CA: Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University.
23. Reeves, B., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
24. Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, R. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 256-283.
25. Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. New York: Free Press.
26. Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: Dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33, 18-30.
27. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
28. So, C. Y. K. (1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the developmental status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 236-255.
29. Stephen, T., & Geel, R. (2007). Normative publication productivity of communication scholars at selected career milestones. Human Communication Research, 33, 103-118.
30. Wiemann, J. M., Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1988). Fragmentation in the field-and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 304-310.
31. Woelfel, J. & Fink, E. L. (1980). The measurement of communication process: Galileo theory and methods. New York: Academic.