Exploring American and Italian consumer preferences for Californian and Italian red wines

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1852-1857

  Torri, Luisa ^a   Noble, Ann Curtis ^b   Heymann, Hildegarde ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GASTRONOMIC SCIENCES   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer segmentation; Cross cultural study; Descriptive sensory analysis; Preference mapping; Red wine

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; HUMAN; ITALY; ODOR; TASTE; UNITED STATES; WINE;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; ITALY; ODORS; TASTE; UNITED STATES; WINE;

EID: 84877607375     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5979     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Assael H, Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Action (3rd edn). Thomas Nelson, Melbourne (1987).
2. Hall J, Shaw M and Doole I, Cross-cultural analysis of wine consumption motivations. Int J Wine Market 9:83-92 (1997).
3. Wright LT, Nancarrow C and Kwok PMH, Case study: food taste preferences and cultural influences on consumption. Br Food J 103:348-357 (2001).
4. Prescott J, Young O, O'Neill L, Yauc NJN and Stevens R, Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Qual Prefer 13:489-495 (2002).
5. Rozin P, Fischler C, Shields C and Masson E, Attitudes towards large numbers of choices in the food domain: a cross-cultural study of five countries in Europe and the USA. Appetite 46:304-308 (2006).
6. Guerrero L, Guàrdia MD, Xicola J, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Zakowska-Biemans S, et al, Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study. Appetite 52:345-354 (2009).
7. Pieniak Z, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Guerrero L and Hersleth M, Association between traditional food consumption and motives for food choice in six European countries. Appetite 53:101-108 (2009).
8. Orth UR, McGarry Wolf M and Dodd TH, Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences. J Prod Brand Manag 14:88-97 (2005).
9. Frøst MB and Noble AC, Preliminary study of the effect of knowledge and sensory expertise on liking for red wines. Am J Enol Vitic 53:275-284 (2002).
10. Fischer U, Petzoldt M, Lebecque A, Serra JN, Giraud G, Resano H, et al, Preference mapping of sensory profiles and hedonist tests. Conf. on Typical Food Products in Europe: Consumer Preference and Objective Assessment, Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 138-147 (2005).
11. Bowers JE, Bandman EB and Meredith CP, DNA fingerprint characterization of some wine grape cultivars. Am J Enol Vitic 44:266-274 (1993).
12. Spencer KC and Humphreys DJ, Argon packaging and processing preserves and enhances flavour. In: KR Cadwallader and H Weenen (eds), Freshness and Shelf life of Foods. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC., pp. 270-291 (2003).
13. ISO, Sensory Analysis. Apparatus. Wine-tasting Glass. ISO 3591 (1977.)
14. Peryam DR and Pilgrim FJ, Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol 11:9-14 (1957.)
15. Naes T and Langsrud O, Fixed or random assessors in sensory profiling. Food Qual Prefer 9:145-152 (1998).
16. Meilgaard M, Civille GV and Carr BT, Sensory Evaluation Techniques (4th edn). CRC Press, London (2006).
17. Husson F, Lê S and Pagès J, Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis. Food Qual Prefer 16:245-250 (2005).