Surgical management of IBD -From an open to a laparoscopic approach

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 297-306

  Maggiori, Léon ^a   Panis, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE COLITIS; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLON RESECTION; CROHN DISEASE; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EMERGENCY SURGERY; ENTERITIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FERTILITY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; ILEOCECAL VALVE; ILEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINAL CONTINUITY RESTORATION; INTESTINE FUNCTION; INTESTINE MALFORMATION; INTESTINE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT SAFETY; PENETRATING CROHN DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; RECTUM RESECTION; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SMALL BOWEL CROHN DISEASE; SMALL INTESTINE RESECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY;

EID: 84877576731     PISSN: 17595045     EISSN: 17595053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.30     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Bernell, O., Lapidus, A. & Hellers, G. Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Ann. Surg. 231, 38-45 (2000).
2. Bernell, O., Lapidus, A. & Hellers, G. Risk factors for surgery and recurrence in 907 patients with primary ileocaecal Crohn's disease. Br. J. Surg. 87, 1697-1701 (2000).
3. Michelassi, F., Balestracci, T., Chappell, R. & Block, G. E. Primary and recurrent Crohn's disease. Experience with 1379 patients. Ann. Surg. 214, 230-240 (1991).
4. Post, S. et al. The impact of disease pattern, surgical management, and individual surgeons on the risk for relaparotomy for recurrent Crohn's disease. Ann. Surg. 223, 253-260 (1996).
5. Chardavoyne, R., Flint, G. W., Pollack, S. & Wise, L. Factors affecting recurrence following resection for Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 29, 495-502 (1986).
6. Bernstein, C. N. et al. World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IBD in 2010. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 16, 112-124 (2010).
7. Gasche, C. et al. A simple classification of Crohn's disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 6, 8-15 (2000).
8. Dignass, A. et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management. J. Crohns Colitis 4, 28-62 (2010).
9. Lichtenstein, G. R., Hanauer, S. B. & Sandborn, W. J. Management of Crohn's disease in adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 465-484 (2009).
10. Eshuis, E. J. et al. Laparoscopic ileocolic resection versus infliximab treatment of distal ileitis in Crohn's disease: a randomized multicenter trial (LIR!C-trial). BMC Surg. 8, 15 (2008).
11. Greenstein, A. J., Mann, D., Sachar, D. B. & Aufses, A. H. Jr. Free perforation in Crohn's disease: I. A survey of 99 cases. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 80, 682-689 (1985).
12. Greenstein, A. J. et al. Spontaneous free perforation and perforated abscess in 30 patients with Crohn's disease. Ann. Surg. 205, 72-76 (1987).
13. Milsom, J. W., Lavery, I. C., Bohm, B. & Fazio, V. W. Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy in Crohn's disease. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 3, 77-80 (1993).
14. Bauer, J. J., Harris, M. T., Grumbach, N. M. & Gorfine, S. R. Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 38, 712-715 (1995).
15. Liu, C. D. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Am. Surg. 61, 1054-1056 (1995).
16. Ludwig, K. A., Milsom, J. W., Church, J. M. & Fazio, V. W. Preliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn's disease. Am. J. Surg. 171, 52-56 (1996).
17. Dasari, B. V., McKay, D. & Gardiner, K. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006956. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006956.pub2 (2011).
18. Rosman, A. S., Melis, M. & Fichera, A. Meta-analysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn's disease. Surg. Endosc. 19, 1549-1555 (2005).
19. Tan, J. J. & Tjandra, J. J. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Dis. Colon Rectum 50, 576-585 (2007).
20. Tilney, H. S. et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis. Surg. Endosc. 20, 1036-1044 (2006).
21. Polle, S. W. et al. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A systematic review. Dig. Surg. 23, 346-357 (2006).
22. Reza, M. M., Blasco, J. A., Andradas, E., Cantero, R. & Mayol, J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 93, 921-928 (2006).
23. Klarenbeek, B. R. et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial. Ann. Surg. 249, 39-44 (2009).
24. Schmidt, C. M. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: reasons for conversion. Ann. Surg. 233, 733-739 (2001).
25. Alves, A. et al. Factors that predict conversion in 69 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a prospective study. Dis. Colon Rectum 48, 2302-2308 (2005).
26. Louis, E. et al. Behaviour of Crohn's disease according to the Vienna classification: changing pattern over the course of the disease. Gut 49, 777-782 (2001).
27. Ananthakrishnan, A. N., McGinley, E. L., Saeian, K. & Binion, D. G. Laparoscopic resection for inflammatory bowel disease: outcomes from a nationwide sample. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 14, 58-65 (2010).
28. Nguyen, S. Q. et al. Laparoscopic resection for Crohn's disease: an experience with 335 cases. Surg. Endosc. 23, 2380-2384 (2009).
29. Maartense, S. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 243, 143-153 (2006).
30. Milsom, J. W. et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 44, 1-9 (2001).
31. Stocchi, L., Milsom, J. W. & Fazio, V. W. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 144, 622-628 (2008).
32. Eshuis, E. J. et al. Long-term outcomes following laparoscopically assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Br. J. Surg. 97, 563-568 (2010).
33. Sica, G. S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open ileo-colonic resection in Crohn's disease: short-and long-term results from a prospective longitudinal study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12, 1094-1102 (2008).
34. Eshuis, E. J. et al. Long-term surgical recurrence, morbidity, quality of life, and body image of laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a comparative study. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 858-867 (2008).
35. Lowney, J. K. et al. Is there any difference in recurrence rates in laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease compared with conventional surgery? A long-term, follow-up study. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 58-63 (2006).
36. Alabaz, O. et al. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Eur. J. Surg. 166, 213-217 (2000).
37. Bergamaschi, R., Pessaux, P. & Arnaud, J. P. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 46, 1129-1133 (2003).
38. Angenete, E., Jacobsson, A., Gellerstedt, M. & Haglind, E. Effect of laparoscopy on the risk of small-bowel obstruction: a population-based register study. Arch. Surg. 147, 359-365 (2012).
39. Duepree, H. J., Senagore, A. J., Delaney, C. P. & Fazio, V. W. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 197, 177-181 (2003).
40. Msika, S. et al. Can laparoscopy reduce hospital stay in the treatment of Crohn's disease? Dis. Colon Rectum 44, 1661-1666 (2001).
41. Young-Fadok, T. M., HallLong, K., McConnell, E. J., Gomez Rey, G. & Cabanela, R. L. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg. Endosc. 15, 450-454 (2001).
42. Duepree, H. J., Senagore, A. J., Delaney, C. P., Brady, K. M. & Fazio, V. W. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 45, 605-610 (2002).
43. Wu, J. S. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications? Surgery 122, 682-689 (1997).
44. Goyer, P. et al. Impact of complex Crohn's disease on the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection: a comparative clinical study in 124 patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 205-210 (2009).
45. Brouquet, A. et al. A laparoscopic approach to iterative ileocolonic resection for the recurrence of Crohn's disease. Surg. Endosc. 24, 879-887 (2010).
46. Tzivanakis, A. et al. Influence of risk factors on the safety of ileocolic anastomosis in Crohn's disease surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 558-562 (2012).
47. Hasegawa, H. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease. Br. J. Surg. 90, 970-973 (2003).
48. Chaudhary, B., Glancy, D. & Dixon, A. R. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn's disease is as safe and effective as primary resection. Colorectal Dis. 13, 1413-1416 (2011).
49. Maggiori, L. et al. Prior abdominal open surgery does not impair the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a case-controlled study in 367 patients. Colorectal Dis. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03150.x.
50. Aytac, E., Stocchi, L., Remzi, F. H. & Kiran, R. P. Is laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease beneficial in patients with previous primary resection through midline laparotomy? A case-matched study. Surg. Endosc. 26, 3552-3556 (2012).
51. Ambe, R., Campbell, L. & Cagir, B. A comprehensive review of strictureplasty techniques in Crohn's disease: types, indications, comparisons, and safety. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16, 209-217 (2012).
52. Fichera, A., Peng, S. L., Elisseou, N. M., Rubin, M. A. & Hurst, R. D. Laparoscopy or conventional open surgery for patients with ileocolonic Crohn's disease? A prospective study. Surgery 142, 566-571 (2007).
53. Laituri, C. A. et al. Laparoscopic ileocecectomy in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 21, 193-195 (2011).
54. Diamond, I. R. & Langer, J. C. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for adolescent Crohn disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 33, 543-547 (2001).
55. von Allmen, D. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection offers advantages over open surgery for treatment of segmental Crohn's disease in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 38, 963-965 (2003).
56. Yamamoto, T., Allan, R. N. & Keighley, M. R. Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 43, 1141-1145 (2000).
57. Kanazawa, A., Yamana, T., Okamoto, K. & Sahara, R. Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications after bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 957-962 (2012).
58. Alves, A. et al. Risk factors for intra-abdominal septic complications after a first ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multivariate analysis in 161 consecutive patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 50, 331-336 (2007).
59. Colombel, J. F. et al. Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn's disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 99, 878-883 (2004).
60. Aberra, F. N. et al. Corticosteroids and immunomodulators: postoperative infectious complication risk in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology 125, 320-327 (2003).
61. Appau, K. A. et al. Use of infliximab within 3 months of ileocolonic resection is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in Crohn's patients. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12, 1738-1744 (2008).
62. Mascarenhas, C. et al. Outcomes of ileocolic resection and right hemicolectomies for Crohn's patients in comparison with non-Crohn's patients and the impact of perioperative immunosuppressive therapy with biologics and steroids on inpatient complications. Am. J. Surg. 203, 375-379 (2012).
63. Regueiro, M. et al. Postoperative infliximab is not associated with an increase in adverse events in Crohn's disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 56, 3610-3615 (2011).
64. Marchal, L. et al. The risk of post-operative complications associated with infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease: a controlled cohort study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 749-754 (2004).
65. Fazio, V. W. et al. Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn's disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 224, 563-573 (1996).
66. Choy, P. Y. et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD004320. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3 (2011).
67. Simillis, C. et al. A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 50, 1674-1687 (2007).
68. McLeod, R. S. et al. Recurrence of Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection is not affected by anastomotic type: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 919-927 (2009).
69. Travis, S. P. et al. European evidence-based Consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: current management. J. Crohns Colitis 2, 24-62 (2008).
70. Kornbluth, A. & Sachar, D. B. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College Of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 501-524 (2010).
71. Truelove, S. C. & Witts, L. J. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial. BMJ 2, 1041-1048 (1955).
72. D'Haens, G. et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132, 763-786 (2007).
73. Carbonnel, F. et al. Colonoscopy of acute colitis. A safe and reliable tool for assessment of severity. Dig. Dis. Sci. 39, 1550-1557 (1994).
74. Alves, A. et al. Subtotal colectomy for severe acute colitis: a 20-year experience of a tertiary care center with an aggressive and early surgical policy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 197, 379-385 (2003).
75. Pezim, M. E. et al. Outcome of "indeterminant" colitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum 32, 653-658 (1989).
76. Teeuwen, P. H. et al. Colectomy in patients with acute colitis: a systematic review. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 13, 676-686 (2009).
77. Dunker, M. S. et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients. Surg. Endosc. 14, 911-914 (2000).
78. Marcello, P. W. et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study. Dis. Colon Rectum 44, 1441-1445 (2001).
79. Seshadri, P. A., Poulin, E. C., Schlachta, C. M., Cadeddu, M. O. & Mamazza, J. Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg. Endosc. 15, 837-842 (2001).
80. Marceau, C. et al. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for acute or severe colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched study in 88 patients. Surgery 141, 640-644 (2007).
81. Telem, D. A. et al. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis: the time has come. Surg. Endosc. 24, 1616-1620 (2010).
82. Chung, T. P. et al. Laparoscopic vs. open total abdominal colectomy for severe colitis: impact on recovery and subsequent completion restorative proctectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 4-10 (2009).
83. Panis, Y. et al. Ileal pouch/anal anastomosis for Crohn's disease. Lancet 347, 854-857 (1996).
84. Regimbeau, J. M. et al. Long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for colorectal Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 44, 769-778 (2001).
85. Melton, G. B. et al. Long-term outcomes with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and Crohn's disease: pouch retention and implications of delayed diagnosis. Ann. Surg. 248, 608-616 (2008).
86. Cohen, J. L. et al. Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum 48, 1997-2009 (2005).
87. Heuschen, U. A. et al. One-or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann. Surg. 234, 788-794 (2001).
88. Joyce, M. R., Kiran, R. P., Remzi, F. H., Church, J. & Fazio, V. W. In a select group of patients meeting strict clinical criteria and undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the omission of a diverting ileostomy offers cost savings to the hospital. Dis. Colon Rectum 53, 905-910 (2010).
89. Fazio, V. W. et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann. Surg. 222, 120-127 (1995).
90. Meagher, A. P., Farouk, R., Dozois, R. R., Kelly, K. A. & Pemberton, J. H. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br. J. Surg. 85, 800-803 (1998).
91. Fazio, V. et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann. Surg. (in press).
92. Maartense, S. et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 240, 984-992 (2004).
93. Schmitt, S. L., Cohen, S. M., Wexner, S. D., Nogueras, J. J. & Jagelman, D. G. Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 9, 134-137 (1994).
94. Marcello, P. W. et al. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 43, 604-608 (2000).
95. Araki, Y., Ishibashi, N., Ogata, Y., Shirouzu, K. & Isomoto, H. The usefulness of restorative laparoscopic-assisted total colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Kurume Med. J. 48, 99-103 (2001).
96. Larson, D. W. et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann. Surg. 243, 667-672 (2006).
97. Zhang, H. et al. Laparoscopic versus open proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 16, 187-191 (2007).
98. El-Gazzaz, G. S., Kiran, R. P., Remzi, F. H., Hull, T. L. & Geisler, D. P. Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy. Br. J. Surg. 96, 522-526 (2009).
99. Fichera, A., Silvestri, M. T., Hurst, R. D., Rubin, M. A. & Michelassi, F. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a comparative observational study on long-term functional results. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 13, 526-532 (2009).
100. Hashimoto, A. et al. Laparascope-assisted versus conventional restorative proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy. Surg. Today 31, 210-214 (2001).
101. Indar, A. A., Efron, J. E. & Young-Fadok, T. M. Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Surg. Endosc. 23, 174-177 (2009).
102. Fleming, F. J. et al. A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum 54, 176-182 (2011).
103. Ahmed Ali, U. et al. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006267.pub2 (2009).
104. Michelassi, F. et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann. Surg. 238, 433-445 (2003).
105. Hahnloser, D. et al. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br. J. Surg. 94, 333-340 (2007).
106. Delaney, C. P. et al. Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann. Surg. 238, 221-228 (2003).
107. Davies, R. J. et al. A prospective evaluation of sexual function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 1032-1035 (2008).
108. Cornish, J. A. et al. The effect of restorative proctocolectomy on sexual function, urinary function, fertility, pregnancy and delivery: a systematic review. Dis. Colon Rectum 50, 1128-1138 (2007).
109. Ording Olsen, K., Juul, S., Berndtsson, I., Oresland, T. & Laurberg, S. Ulcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample. Gastroenterology 122, 15-19 (2002).
110. Lepisto, A., Sarna, S., Tiitinen, A. & Jarvinen, H. J. Female fertility and childbirth after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br. J. Surg. 94, 478-482 (2007).
111. Waljee, A., Waljee, J., Morris, A. M. & Higgins, P. D. Threefold increased risk of infertility: a meta-analysis of infertility after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Gut 55, 1575-1580 (2006).
112. Rajaratnam, S. G., Eglinton, T. W., Hider, P. & Fearnhead, N. S. Impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on female fertility: meta-analysis and systematic review. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 26, 1365-1374 (2011).
113. Bartels, S. A. et al. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann. Surg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318250caa9.
114. Lefevre, J. H. et al. Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients. Surg. Endosc. 23, 166-173 (2009).
115. Beyer-Berjot, L. et al. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a two-center study. Ann. Surg. (in press).
116. Heuschen, U. A. et al. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann. Surg. 235, 207-216 (2002).
117. Lake, J. P. et al. Effect of high-dose steroids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 8, 547-551 (2004).
118. Selvasekar, C. R. et al. Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204, 956-963 (2007).
119. Sugerman, H. J. et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann. Surg. 232, 530-541 (2000).
120. Weston-Petrides, G. K. et al. Comparison of outcomes after retorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch. Surg. 143, 406-412 (2008).
121. Miskovic, D., Ni, M., Wyles, S. M., Tekkis, P. & Hanna, G. B. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 1300-1310 (2012).
122. Hallberg, H., Stahlberg, D. & Akerlund, J. E. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): functional outcome after postoperative pelvic sepsis. A prospective study of 100 patients. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 20, 529-533 (2005).
123. Selvaggi, F. et al. The effect of pelvic septic complications on function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single center experience. Am. Surg. 76, 428-435 (2010).
124. Hahnloser, D. et al. The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann. Surg. 240, 615-623 (2004).
125. Lovegrove, R. E. et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann. Surg. 244, 18-26 (2006).
126. Manilich, E., Remzi, F. H., Fazio, V. W., Church, J. M. & Kiran, R. P. Prognostic modeling of preoperative risk factors of pouch failure. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 393-399 (2012).
127. Rodriguez-Sanjuan, J. C., Polavieja, M. G., Naranjo, A. & Castillo, J. Adenocarcinoma in an ileal pouch for ulcerative colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum 38, 779-780 (1995).
128. Remzi, F. H. et al. Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years. Dis. Colon Rectum 46, 6-13 (2003).
129. Kariv, R. et al. Preoperative colorectal neoplasia increases risk for pouch neoplasia in patients with restorative proctocolectomy. Gastroenterology 139, 806-812, e801-e802 (2010).
130. Lovegrove, R. E. et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 9, 310-320 (2007).
131. Rijcken, E., Mennigen, R., Argyris, I., Senninger, N. & Bruewer, M. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 140-146 (2012).
132. Leblanc, F., Makhija, R., Champagne, B. J. & Delaney, C. P. Single incision laparoscopic total colectomy and proctocolectomy for benign disease: initial experience. Colorectal Dis. 13, 1290-1293 (2011).
133. Bulian, D. R., Knuth, J., Krakamp, B. & Heiss, M. M. Restorative restproctectomy as single-port surgery through the ostomy site in a three-stage procedure. Surg. Endosc. 26, 3688-3890 (2012).
134. Gash, K. J., Goede, A. C., Kaldowski, B., Vestweber, B. & Dixon, A. R. Single incision laparoscopic (SILS) restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 25, 3877-3880 (2011).
135. Geisler, D. P., Kirat, H. T. & Remzi, F. H. Single-port laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: initial operative experience. Surg. Endosc. 25, 2175-2178 (2011).
136. Maggiori, L., Gaujoux, S., Tribillon, E., Bretagnol, F. & Panis, Y. Single incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures. Colorectal Dis. 14, e643-e654 (2012).
137. Poon, J. T., Cheung, C. W., Fan, J. K., Lo, O. S. & Law, W. L. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 26, 2729-2734 (2012).
138. Pedraza, R., Patel, C. B., Ramos-Valadez, D. I. & Haas, E. M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 20, 234-239 (2011).
139. Miller, A. T. et al. Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16, 587-594 (2012).
140. Park, J. S., Choi, G. S., Park, S. Y., Kim, H. J. & Ryuk, J. P. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br. J. Surg. 99, 1219-1226 (2012).
141. McKenzie, S., Baek, J. H., Wakabayashi, M., Garcia-Aguilar, J. & Pigazzi, A. Totally laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction: the authors' initial institutional experience. Surg. Endosc. 24, 2048-2052 (2010).
142. Akamatsu, H. et al. Totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a simple and safe technique for intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 23, 2605-2609 (2009).
143. Lacy, A. M. et al. Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice total colectomy: technical report of a minilaparoscopy-assisted transrectal resection. Surg. Endosc. 26, 2080-2085 (2012).