|
Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 58-63
|
Is there any difference in recurrence rates in laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease compared with conventional surgery? A long-term, follow-up study
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Crohn's disease; Ileocolic resection; Laparoscopy; Long term results; Recurrence
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;
AZATHIOPRINE;
GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR;
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;
INFLIXIMAB;
METHOTREXATE;
STEROID;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROHN DISEASE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
ILEOCECAL VALVE;
ILEOCOLIC RESECTION;
ILEUM;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
INTERVIEW;
INTESTINE RESECTION;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LONG TERM CARE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL RECORD;
RECURRENCE RISK;
RECURRENT DISEASE;
REOPERATION;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TELEPHONE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
COLECTOMY;
COLITIS;
CROHN DISEASE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
ILEITIS;
INCIDENCE;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
RECURRENCE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 29244483685
PISSN: 00123706
EISSN: 15300358
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0214-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (106)
|
References (11)
|