Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 522-526

  El Gazzaz, G S ^a   Kiran, R P ^a   Remzi, F H ^a   Hull, T L ^a   Geisler, D P ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS; BLEEDING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COLON DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COLONIC DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65249116319     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6578     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 759-766.
2. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-1726.
3. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477-484.
4. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
5. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1301-1307.
6. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Soler JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 984-992.
7. Larson DW, Dozoiz EJ, Piotrowicz K, Cima RR, Wolff BG, Young-Fadok TM. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1845-1850.
8. Larson DW, Davies MM, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Piotrowicz K, Anderson K et al. Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 392-396.
9. Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozoiz EJ, Davies M, Piotrowicz K, Barnes SA et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 667-672.
10. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 120-127.
11. Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC, Church JM, Lau P, Strong SA et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 575-584.
12. Santoro E, Carlini M, Carboni F, Feroce A. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46: 894-899.
13. Schmitt SL, Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int J Colorectal Dis 1994; 9: 134-137.
14. Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J, Edye M, Jagelman DG, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 47-50.