Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing activities of daily living in outpatients with stroke

Physical Therapy

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 681-693

  Hsueh, I Ping ^a   Chen, Jyun Hong ^b   Wang, Chun Hou ^c   Hou, Wen Hsuan ^d   Hsieh, Ching Lin ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877089070     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120173     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Desai AK, Grossberg GT, Sheth DN. Activities of daily living in patients with dementia: clinical relevance, methods of assessment and effects of treatment. CNS Drugs. 2004;18:853-875.
2. Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, 5-item Barthel Index, and 10-item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73: 188-190.
3. Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Chen MH, et al. Evaluation of stroke patients with the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22: 495-500.
4. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:721-726.
5. Glenny C, Stolee P, Thompson M, et al. Underestimating physical function gains: comparing FIM motor subscale and inter-RAI post acute care activities of daily living scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93: 1000-1008.
6. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
7. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12:166-170.
8. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP. A cross-validation of the comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999;31:83-88.
9. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:161-165.
10. Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:1627-1636.
11. Schuling J,de Haan R,Limburg M,Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173-1177.
12. Hsueh IP, Chen JH, Wang CH, et al. Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing balance function in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 2010;90: 1336-1344.
13. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, et al. Developing a contemporary patientreported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92:S44-S51.
14. Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Shechtman O, et al. Development of an item bank for a computerised adaptive test of upperextremity function. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2092-2104.
15. Lai JS, Cella D, Choi S, et al. How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: a PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92:S20-S27.
16. Tulsky DS, Carlozzi NE, Cella D. Advances in outcomes measurement in rehabilitation medicine: current initiatives from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:S1-S6.
17. Cook C, Goode A, Erb D, et al. Validation of an item bank in a sample of communitydwelling survivors of a stroke. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;29:107-114.
18. Coster WJ, Haley SM, Andres PL, et al. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Med Care. 2004;42:I62-I72.
19. Haley SM, Siebens H, Coster WJ, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, I: activity outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1033-1042.
20. Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Medical Publications; 1992.
21. Hsieh CL, Hoffmann T, Gustafsson L, Lee YC. The diverse constructs use of activities of daily living measures in stroke randomized controlled trials in the years 2005-2009. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44: 720-726.
22. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 2000.
23. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007;45:S22-S31.
24. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
25. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21:230-258.
26. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, et al. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61: 17-33.
27. Teresi JA, Ocepek-Welikson K, Kleinman M, et al. Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory loglikelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(suppl 1): 43-68.
28. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100:526-532.
29. Weisscher N, Glas CA, Vermeulen M, De Haan RJ. The use of an item response theory-based disability item bank across diseases: accounting for differential item functioning. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63: 543-549.
30. Computerized Adaptive Testing Systems for Patients With Stroke. Available at: http://140.112.116.44/cat_en/.
31. Haley SM, Gandek B, Siebens H, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, II: participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:275-283.
32. Weisscher N, Post B, de Haan RJ et al. The AMC Linear Disability Score in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2007;69:2155-2161.
33. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, et al. Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology. 2003;60: 291-296.
34. Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psychol Meas. 1992;16:159.
35. Chang CH, Reeve BB. Item response theory and its applications to patientreported outcomes measurement. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:264-282.
36. Anatchkova MD, Rose M, Ware JE Jr, Bjorner JB. Development of an item bank and computer adaptive test for role functioning. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1625-1637.
37. Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:S22-S35.