The diverse constructsuse of activities of daily living measures in stroke randomized controled trials in the years 2005-2009

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 720-726

  Hsieh, Ching Lin ^a   Hoffmann, Tammy ^b,c   Gustafsson, Louise ^c   Lee, Ya Chen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Measures; Randomized controlled trial; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866029352     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999; 30: 1362-1369. (Pubitemid 29296062)
2. Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2004; 35: 918-923. (Pubitemid 38419803)
3. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 24-28. (Pubitemid 13177594)
4. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429-1438. (Pubitemid 30351269)
5. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-489. (Pubitemid 26418179)
6. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 721-726.
7. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP. A cross-validation of the comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1999; 31: 83-88.
8. Holsbeeke L, Ketelaar M, Schoemaker MM, Gorter JW. Capacity, capability, and performance: different constructs or three of a kind? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 849-855.
9. Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 380-386. (Pubitemid 24139583)
10. Ostir GV, Volpato S, Kasper JD, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM. Summarizing amount of difficulty in ADLs: a refined characterization of disability. Results from the women's health and aging study. Aging (Milano) 2001; 13: 465-472. (Pubitemid 34071376)
11. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64-67.
12. Michielsen ME, de Niet M, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ, Bussmann JB. Evidence of a logarithmic relationship between motor capacity and actual performance in daily life of the paretic arm following stroke. J Rehab Med 2009; 41: 327-331.
13. Morris C. Measuring participation in childhood disability: how does the capability approach improve our understanding? Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51: 92-94.
14. Nordenfelt L. On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1461-1465. (Pubitemid 44857803)
15. Smith DS, Clark MS. Competence and performance in activities of daily living of patients following rehabilitation from stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 15-23.
16. Barkat-Masih M, Saha C, Golomb MR. Asking the kids: How children view their abilities after perinatal stroke. J Child Neurol 2011; 26: 44-48.
17. Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK, Bombardier C, Wright JG. The context of measuring disability: Does it matter whether capability or performance is measured? J Clin Epidmiol 1996; 49: 1097-1101. (Pubitemid 26348605)
18. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1-14.
19. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1992.
20. Walsh EG, Khatutsky G. Mode of administration effects on disability measures in a sample of frail beneficiaries. Gerontologist 2007; 47: 838-844. (Pubitemid 351171905)
21. Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: selfreporting versus actual performance in the old-old (> or=75 years). J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 832-836. (Pubitemid 27289930)
22. Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 43: 522-528.
23. Leonard EE, Wynd CA. Meta-analysis as a tool for evidence-based practice: an example using the Rice meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions. Appl Nurs Res 2008; 21: 40-44.
24. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional Evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
25. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63.
26. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6-18.
27. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An Extended Activities of Daily Living Index for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-305
28. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166-170. (Pubitemid 15212131)
29. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703-709. (Pubitemid 19213114)
30. Grimby G, Andren E, Holmgren E, Wright B, Linacre JM, Sundh V. Structure of a combination of Functional Independence Measure and Instrumental Activity Measure items in community-living persons: a study of individuals with cerebral palsy and spina bifida. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1109-1114. (Pubitemid 26378627)
31. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-186.
32. Prosiegel M, Böttger S, Schenk T, König N, Marolf M, Vaney C et al. Der erweiterte Barthel Index (EBI) - eine neue Skala zur Erfassung von fähigkeitsstorungen bei neurologischen Patienten. Neurol Rehabil 1996; 20: 86-93.
33. Quinn TJ, Langhorn P. Barthel index for stroke trials: Development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011; 42: 1-6.
34. Grimby G, Andren E, Daving Y, Wright B. Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: a study of instrumental structures. Stroke 1998; 29: 1843-1849. (Pubitemid 28399975)
35. Reistetter TA, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Granger CV, Markello S, Ottenbacher KJ. Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 345-350.
36. Shyu YI, Maa SH, Chen ST, Chen MC. Quality of life among older stroke patients in Taiwan during the first year after discharge. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18: 2320-2328.
37. Park JY, Chun MH, Kang SH, Lee JA, Kim BR, Shin MJ. Functional outcome in poststroke patients with or without fatigue. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 554-558.
38. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIMTM instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY 14214: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.