Development of an item bank for a computerised adaptive test of upper-extremity function

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 21-22, 2011, Pages 2092-2104

  Lehman, Leigh A ^a   Woodbury, Michelle ^b,c   Shechtman, Orit ^d   Wang, Ying Chih ^e,f   Pomeranz, Jamie ^d   Gray, David B ^g   Velozo, Craig A ^d,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE   (United States)

^b RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^f Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes Inc   (United States)

^g WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h North Florida/South Georgia Veteran's Affairs System Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

computer adaptive testing; ICF; ICF activity measure; upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 80053466177     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.560336     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barr T. Digest of data on persons with disabilities. In: Barr T, editor. Orthotics and prosthetics list. Washington DC, USA: Department for Education; 2001.
2. Bot SDM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DAWM, Bouter LM, Dekker J, Vet HCW. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann of Rheum Dis 2004;63:335-341. (Pubitemid 38453296)
3. Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliabadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of syptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1021-1027. (Pubitemid 35396931)
4. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook K, Crane PK, Teresi JA, Thissen D, Revicki DA, Weiss DJ, Hambleton RK, Liu H, Gershon R, Reise SP, Lai JS, Cella D, on behalf of the PROMIS cooperative group. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-S31.
5. Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Clinical interpretation of a lower-extremity functional scale-derived computerized adaptive test. Phys Ther 2009;89: 957-968.
6. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:17-33. (Pubitemid 350236703)
7. Leavitt M. Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. MedGenMed 2001;3:2.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA. Guidance for industry, patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Silver Spring, MD (Maryland), USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA. 2006.
9. Resnik L, Hart DL. Using clinical outcomes to identify expert physical therapists. Phys Ther 2003;83:990-1002. (Pubitemid 37337906)
10. Resnik L, Liu D, Hart DL, Mor V. Benchmarking physical therapy clinic performance: statistical methods to enhance internal validity when using observational data. Phys Ther 2008;88:1078-1087.
11. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128-146. (Pubitemid 32463650)
12. Research Committee ASaES. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994;3:347-352.
13. Constant CR, Murley AG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-164. (Pubitemid 17019681)
14. Chung KC, Hamil JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:619-622. (Pubitemid 29262730)
15. Leeb BF, Sautner J, Andel I, Rintelen B. SACRAH: a Score for Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatic Affections of the Hands. Rheumatology 2003;42:1-6.
16. Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA. A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, editors. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993. pp 501-518.
17. Hart DL, Cook KF, Mioduski JE, Teal CR, Crane PK. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:290-298. (Pubitemid 43243655)
18. Velozo CA, Wang Y, Lehman L, Wang JH. Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:458-467. (Pubitemid 351298316)
19. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2001.
20. Schwarz N, Sudman S. Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: Bass Publishers; 1996.
21. Linacre JM. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement. 2005.
22. Muthen L, Muthen B. Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 1998-2007.
23. Mahony D. Psychological Assessments of Bariatric Surgery Patients. Development, Reliability, and Exploratory Factor Analysis of the PsyBari. Obes Surg. 2010:12. DOI of 10.1007/s11695-010-0108-0.
24. Fabrigar L, Wegener D, MacCallum R, Strahan E. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999;3:272-299.
25. Linacre J. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas 2002;3:85-106.
26. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
27. Smith EV. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multi-dimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002;3:205-231.
28. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press; 1979.
29. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable item mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans 1994;8:370.
30. Mallinson T, Stelmack J, Velozo C. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient a in the creation of minimum item sets. Med Care 2004;42(1 Suppl.):I17-I24.
31. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics and Assessment Press; 1982.
32. Chen CC, Granger CV, Peimer CA, Moy OJ, Wald S. Manual ability measure (MAM-16): A preliminary report on a new patient-centered and task-oriented outcome measure of hand function. J Hand Surg B 2005;30:207-216. (Pubitemid 40331473)
33. Penta M, Thonnard JL, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1038-1042. (Pubitemid 28419308)
34. Luquet C, Chau N, Nadif M, Guillemin F, Gavillot C, Petry D, Moreau T, Bourgkard E, Hecquet B, André JM, Mur JM. Unidimenstionality of a functional measure for patients with an injured upper limb. Rew Epidemiol Sante Publique 1996;44:248-261. (Pubitemid 26225230)
35. Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Eignor D, Flaugher R, Green BF, Mislevy RJ, Steinberg L, Thissen D. Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
36. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000;38(9 Suppl.):II28-II42.
37. Lord FM. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1980.
38. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
39. Xing D, Hambleton RK. Impact of test design, item quality, and item bank size on the psychometric properties of computer-based credentialing examinations. Educ Psychol Meas 2004;64:15-21.