Development of an item bank and computer adaptive test for role functioning

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1625-1637

  Anatchkova, Milena D ^a   Rose, Matthias ^a,b   Ware Jr , John E ^a,c   Bjorner, Jakob B ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c John Ware Research Group   (United States)

^d NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

^e QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

Author keywords

CAT; Computer adaptive test; IRT; Role function

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SATISFACTION; SELF REPORT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867989692     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-0076-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. World Health Organization (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF - The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).
2. Merikangas, K. R., Ames, M., Cui, L., et al. (2007). The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(10), 1180-1188. (Pubitemid 47529342)
3. Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95-108. (Pubitemid 47036912)
4. Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17-33. (Pubitemid 350236703)
5. Anatchkova, M. D., & Bjorner, J. B. (2010). Health and role functioning: The use of focus groups in the development of an item bank. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 111-123.
6. Anatchkova, M. D., Ware, J. E., & Bjorner, J. B. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank. Quality of Life Research, 20, 745-758.
7. Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Jette, A. M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2007). Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86(0894-9115; 1), 57-71. (Pubitemid 46360565)
8. Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., et al. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(2), 275-283.
9. Mulcahey, M. J., Haley, S. M., Duffy, T., Pengsheng, N., & Betz, R. R. (2008). Measuring physical functioning in children with spinal impairments with computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 28(0271-6798; 3), 330-335. (Pubitemid 351440842)
10. Wilkie, D. J., Judge, M. K., Berry, D. L., Dell, J., Zong, S., & Gilespie, R. (2003). Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(0885-3924; 3), 213-224. (Pubitemid 36287080)
11. Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 913-933. (Pubitemid 37386622)
12. Bayliss, M. S., Dewey, J. E., Dunlap, I., et al. (2003). A study of the feasibility of internet administration of a computerized health survey: The headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 953-961. (Pubitemid 37386624)
13. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
14. Ramsay, J. (1995). TestGraf - A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data. Montreal, Canada: McGill University.
15. Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications. Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S152- S170. (Pubitemid 44632041)
16. Teresi, J. A., & Fleishman, J. A. (2007). Differential item functioning and health assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 33-42. (Pubitemid 47036917)
17. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., et al. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 69-84. (Pubitemid 47036918)
18. Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (Ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, Ontario: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
19. Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692.
20. Muraki, E. (1997). Generalized partial credit model. In V. D. Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory (pp. 153-164). New York, NY: Springer.
21. Muraki, E., & Bock, R. (1996). Parscale - IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded open-ended exercises and performance tasks. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, Inc.
22. Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 5-18. (Pubitemid 47036924)
23. Bjorner, J. B., Smith, K., Stone, C., & Sun. X. (2007). IRTFIT: A macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models.
24. Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(1), 50-64.
25. Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further examination of the performance of S-X2, an item fit index for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289-298. (Pubitemid 36891669)
26. Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427-450.
27. Stewart, A. L., Greenfield, S., Hays, R. D., et al. (1989). Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA, 262(7), 907-913. (Pubitemid 19208947)
28. Sprangers, M. A., de Regt, E. B., Andries, F., et al. (2000). Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(9), 895-907.
29. Kempen, G. I., Sanderman, R., Miedema, I., Meyboom-de Jong, B., & Ormel, J. (2000). Functional decline after congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction and the impact of psychological attributes. A prospective study. Quality of Life Research, 9(4), 439-450.
30. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247-263.
31. Hahn, E. A., Cella, D., Bode, R. K., & Hanrahan, R. T. (2010). Measuring social well-being in people with chronic illness. Social Indicators Research, 96(3), 381-401.
32. Hahn, E. A., Devellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1035-1044.
33. Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22-S31.