Dimensionality reduction in drought modelling

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1399-1410

  Santos, João Filipe ^a   Portela, Maria Manuela ^b   Pulido Calvo, Inmaculada ^c  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE BEJA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HUELVA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Drought monitoring; Mutual information; Portugal; Rain gauge network; Sensitivity analysis; Standardized precipitation index

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT MONITORING; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; PORTUGAL; RAIN GAUGE NETWORKS; STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION INDEX;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GAGES; NEURAL NETWORKS; RAIN GAGES; REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DROUGHT;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DROUGHT; MONITORING SYSTEM; RAINGAUGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

PORTUGAL;

EID: 84877038360     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9300     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akhtari R, Morid S, Mahdianc MH, Smakhtind V. 2009. Assessment of areal interpolation methods for spatial analysis of SPI and EDI drought indices. International Journal of Climatology 29: 135-145.
2. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. 2000a. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I. Preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrology Engineering 5(2): 115-123.
3. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. 2000b. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II. Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrology Engineering 5(2): 124-137.
4. Back AD, Trappenberg TP. 2001. Selecting inputs for modeling using normalized higher order statistics and independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 12(3): 612-617.
5. Bastin G, Lorent B, Dunqué C, Gevers M. 1984. Optimal estimation of the average areal rainfall and optimal selection of rain gauge locations. Water Resources Research 20(4): 463-470.
6. Bogardi I, Bardossy A. 1985. Multicriterion network design using geostatistics. Water Resources Research 21(2): 199-208.
7. Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Rossi G. 2003. Network design for drought monitoring by geostatistical techniques. European Water Publications 3/4: 9-15.
8. Borrough PA, McDonnell RA. 1998. Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
9. Bowden GJ, Dandy GC, Maier HR. 2005. Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1-background and methodology. Journal of Hydrology 301: 75-92.
10. Chebbi A, Bargaouir ZK, Cunha MC. 2011. Optimal extension of rain gauge monitoring network for rainfall intensity and erosivity index interpolation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 16: 353-365.
11. Chen Y-C, Wei C, Yeh H-C. 2008. Rainfall network design using kriging and entropy. Hydrological Processes 22: 340-346. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6292.
12. Elgaali E, García LA. 2007. Using neural networks to model the impacts of climate change on water supplies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 133(3): 230-243.
13. Fernando MKG, Maier HR, Dandy GC. 2009. Selection of input variables for data driven models: An average shifted histogram partial mutual information estimator approach. Journal of Hydrology 367: 165-176.
14. Guest JK, Smith-Genut LC. 2010.Reducing dimensionality in topology optimization using adaptive design variable fields. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 81: 1019-1045.
15. Gutiérrez-Estrada JC, Bilton DT. 2010. A heuristic approach to predicting water beetle diversity in temporary and fluctuating waters. Ecological Modelling 221: 1451-1462.
16. Gutiérrez-Estrada JC, Silva C, Yáñez E, Rodríguez N, Pulido-Calvo I. 2007. Monthly catch forecasting of anchovy Engraulisringens in the north area of Chile: Non-linear univariate approach. Fisheries Research 86: 188-200.
17. Gutiérrez-Estrada JC, Yáñez E, Pulido-Calvo I, Silva C, Plaza F, Bórquez C. 2009. Pacific sardine (Sardinopssagax, Jenyns 1842) landings prediction.A neural network ecosystemic approach. Fisheries Research 100: 116-125.
18. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Babin B, Black B (eds). 2005. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall: London, UK; 928.
19. Hartigan JA, Wong MA. 1979. Algorithm AS 136.A K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics 28(1): 100-108.
20. Holliday JD, Rodgers SL, Willett P. 2004. Clustering files of chemical structures using the fuzzy K-means clustering method. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 44: 894-902.
21. Hsu K, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S. 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research 31(10): 2517-2530.
22. Hunter A, Kennedy L, Henry J, Ferguson I. 2000. Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 62: 11-19.
23. Iyer MS, Rhinehart RR. 1999. A method to determine the required number of neural-network training repetitions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(2): 427-432.
24. Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S. 2004. Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrological Processes 18: 571-581.
25. Kahya E, Demirel MC, Beg OA. 2008. Hydrologic homogeneous regions using monthly streamflow in Turkey. Earth Science Resources Journal 12(2): 181-193.
26. Kitanidis PK, Bras RL. 1980. Real time forecasting with a conceptual hydrological model. 2. Applications and results. Water Resources Research 16(6): 1034-1044.
27. Legates DR, McCabe Jr. GJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241.
28. Maier HR, Dandy GC. 1996. Neural network models for forecasting univariate time series. Neural Network World 5: 747-772.
29. Maier HR, Dandy GC. 1997. Methods for determining the inputs to artificial neural networks for forecasting water quality in rivers. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering 12: 353-368.
30. Maier HR, Dandy GC. 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: are view of modeling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling and Software 15: 101-124.
31. Matheron G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58: 1246-1266.
32. May RJ, Maier HR, Dandy GC, Fernando TMKG. 2008. Non-linear variable selection for artificial neural networks using partial mutual information. Environmental Modelling and Software 23(10-11): 1312-1326.
33. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J. 1993.The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society: Boston; 179-184.
34. Moddemeijer R. 1989. On estimation of entropy and mutual information of consinuous distributions. Signal Processing 16(3): 233-246.
35. Murphy AH. 1991. Forecast verification: its complexity and dimensionality. Monthly Weather Review 119: 1590-1601.
36. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
37. Pardo-Igúzquiza E. 1998. Optimal selection of number and location of rainfall gauges for areal rainfall estimation using geostatistics and simulated annealing. Journal of Hydrology 210: 206-220.
38. Portela MM, Quintela AC. 2006. Estimação em Portugal Continental de escoamento e de capacidadesuteis de albufeiras de regularização na ausência de informação. Recursos Hidrícos 27(2): 7-18 (in Portuguese).
39. Pulido-Calvo I, Portela MM. 2007.Application of neural approaches to one-step daily flow forecasting in Portuguese watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 332: 1-15.
40. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. 1986. 'Learning' representations by backpropagation errors. Nature 323: 533-536.
41. Santos JF, Portela MM, Pulido-Calvo I. 2011. Regional frequency analysis of droughts in Portugal. Water Resources Management 25(14): 3537-3558.
42. Santos JF, Pulido-Calvo I, Portela MM. 2010. Spatial and temporal variability of droughts in Portugal. Water Resources Research 46: W03503. DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008071.
43. Schleiter IM, Borchardt D, Wagner D, Dapper T, Schmidt KD, Schmidt HH, Werner H. 1999. Modelling water quality, bioindication and population dynamics in lotic ecosystems using neural networks. Ecological Modelling 120: 271-286.
44. Senthil-Kumar AR, Sudheer KP, Jain SK, Agarwal PK. 2005. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types. Hydrological Processes 19: 1277-1291. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5581.
45. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communications. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423 and 623-656.
46. Sharma A. 2000. Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: Part1- A strategy for system predictor identification. Journal of Hydrology 239: 232-239.
47. Shrestha RR, Theobald S, Nestmann F. 2005. Simulation of flood flow in a river system using artificial neural networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 9(4): 313-321.
48. Tsakiris G. 2008. Uni-dimensional analysis of droughts for management decisions. European Water 23/24: 3-11.
49. Vicente-Serrano SM, Saz-Sánchez MA, Cuadrat JM. 2003. Comparative analysis of interpolation methods in the middle Ebro Valley (Spain): application to annual precipitation and temperature. Climate Research Journal 24: 161-180.
50. Webster R, Oliver MA. 1990. Numerical classification: Non hierarchical methods. In Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey, chap. 11. Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford, U.K; 191-212.
51. Willmott CJ. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63: 1309-1313.
52. Yáñez E, Plaza F, Gutiérrez-Estrada JC, Rodríguez N, Barbieri MA, Pulido-Calvo I, Bórquez C. 2010. Anchovy (Engraulis ringens) and sardine (Sardinops sagax) abundance forecast off northern Chile: A multivariate ecosystemic neural network approach. Progress in Oceanography 87: 242-250.
53. Zheng GL, Billings SA. 1996. Radial Basis Function Network Configuration using Mutual Information and the Orthogonal Least Squares Algorithm. Neural Networks 9: 1619-1637.