Crowd computing: Using competitive dynamics to develop and refine highly predictive models

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 18, Issue 9-10, 2013, Pages 472-478

  Bentzien, Jörg ^a   Muegge, Ingo ^a   Hamner, Ben ^b   Thompson, David C ^a  

^a BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC   (United States)

^b GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; DRUG INDUSTRY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTAGENICITY TESTS;

EID: 84876920284     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: 18785832     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. J. Murphy Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations Nature 430 2004 768 772
2. B. Qian High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem Nature 450 2007 259 264
3. Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS). Available at: http://www.mersenne.org/
4. M.R. Shirts, and V. Pande Screen savers of the world unite! Science 290 2000 1903 1904
5. Open-Source software for volunteer computing and grid computing. Available at: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/
6. G. De Fabritiis Performance of the cell processor for biomolecular simulations Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 2007 660
7. G. Giupponi The impact of accelerator processors for high-throughput molecular modeling and simulation Drug Discov. Today 13 2008 1052 1058
8. J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World 2011 Penguin Press
9. S. Cooper Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game Nature 466 2010 756 760
10. F. Khatib Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 2011 18949 18953
11. M. Lessl Crowd sourcing in drug discovery Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10 2011 241 242
12. D. Gardner Future Babble: How to Stop Worrying and Love the Unpredictable 2011 Virgin Books
13. N. Silver The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail But Some Don't 2012 Penguin Press
14. S.R. Allerheiligen Next-generation model-based drug discovery and development: quantitative and systems pharmacology Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 88 2010 135 137
15. G.L. Warren Essential considerations for using protein-ligand structures in drug discovery Drug Discov. Today 17 2012 1270 1281
16. S.P. Maddaford A medicinal chemistry perspective on structure-based drug design and development Methods Mol. Biol. 841 2012 351 381
17. X.Y. Meng Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 7 2011 146 157
18. E. Gallicchio, and R.M. Levy Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities Adv. Prot. Chem. Struct. Biol. 85 2011 27 80
19. F.R. Salsbury Jr. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 10 2010 738 744
20. B.K. Shoichet, and B.K. Kobilka Structure-based drug screening for G-protein-coupled receptors Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33 2012 268 272
21. H. Eckert, and J. Bajorath Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches Drug Discov. Today 12 2007 225 233
22. C. Merlot Chemical substructures in drug discovery Drug Discov. Today 8 2003 594 602
23. M.G. Siegel, and M. Vieth Drugs in other drugs: a new look at drugs as fragments Drug Discov. Today 12 2007 71 79
24. A. Tropsha, and A. Golbraikh Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening Curr. Pharm. Des. 13 2007 3494 3504
25. D. Loughney To measure is to know: an approach to CADD performance metrics Drug Discov. Today 16 2011 548 554
26. G. Moroy Toward in silico structure-based ADMET prediction in drug discovery Drug Discov. Today 17 2012 44 55
27. J.O. Ebalunode Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design Methods Mol. Biol. 685 2011 111 133
28. K. Hansen Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 2009 2077 2081
29. I. Sushko Applicability domains for classification problems: benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 2010 2094 2111
30. B.N. Ames An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 1973 782 786
31. ® ISIS for EXCEL 2.0 SP5, MDL Information Systems Inc
32. Corina, version 3.48 (2010) Molecular Networks GmbH: Erlangen, Germany
33. PipelinePilot, version 8.0.1.500 (2010) Accelrys Software Inc.: San Diego, CA
34. W.W.L. Wong, and F.J. Burkowski A constructive approach for discovering new drug leads: using a kernel methodology for the inverse-QSAR problem J. Cheminformatics 1 2009 4
35. A.T. Balaban Can topological indices transmit information on properties but not on structures? J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des. 19 2005 651 660
36. F. Pedregosa Scikit-learn: machine learning in python J. Machine Learning Res. 12 2011 2825 2830
37. MC4PC, version 2.0.0.95 (2008) MultiCASE Inc.: Beachwood, OH
38. J. Kazius Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction J. Med. Chem. 48 2005 312 320
39. W.W. Piegorsch, and E. Zeiger Measuring intra-assay agreement for the Ames Salmonella assay. Statistical Methods in Toxicology L. Hothorn, Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics vol. 43 1991 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg pp. 35-41
40. D.J. Hand Classifier technology and the illusion of progress Statistical Science 21 2006 1 15
41. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) (2011) 2011.10; Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1010 Sherbooke St. West, Suite #910, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2R7
42. D. Fourches Trust, but verify: on the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 2010 1189 1204
43. D.C. Thompson Competitive data science: a tale of two web services 244th ACS National Meeting Exposition Philadelphia, PA, 2012 2012 CINF 6
44. K.L. Wagstaff Machine learning that matters Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) 2012 (CL #12-2026)
45. 'Scientists See Advances in Deep-Learning Programs', New York Times, November 23rd 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/24/science/scientists-see- advances-in-deep-learning-a-part-of-artificial-intelligence.html?-r=0
46. MolConnZ v. 4.12 (2009) EduSoft, P.O. 1811, Ashland, VA 23005
47. BioByte clogP v. 5.3 (2010) BioByte Corp., 201 W. 4th St., #204, Claremont, CA 91711-4707
48. R.E. Carhart Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and application J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25 1985 64 73
49. Daylight v4.94 Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., PO Box 7737, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677