Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Connallon, Tim ^a   Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; FITNESS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; POPULATION GENETICS; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; SEXUAL SELECTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; X CHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; X CHROMOSOME;

MAMMALIA; THERIA;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENES, X-LINKED; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 84876886816     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003440     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Payer B, Lee JT, (2008) X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Ann Rev Genet 42: 733-772.
2. Deakin JE, Chaumeil J, Hore TA, Graves JAM, (2009) Unravelling the evolutionary origins of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Chromosome Research 17: 671-685.
3. Cooper DW, VandeBerg JL, Sharman GB, Poole WE, (1971) Phosphoglycerate kinase polymorphism in kangaroos provides further evidence for paternal X inactivation. Nature New Biology 230: 155-157.
4. Sharman GB, (1971) Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosome of female kangaroos. Nature 230: 231-232.
5. Lyon MF, (1961) Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190: 372-373.
6. Wang X, Soloway PD, Clark AG, (2010) Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain. Genome Biology 11: R79.
7. Gregg C, Zhang J, Butler JE, Haig D, Dulac C, (2010) Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329: 682-685.
8. Cooper DW, Johnston PG, Graves JAM, (1993) X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Seminars in Developmental Biology 4: 117-128.
9. Chandra HS, Brown SW, (1975) Chromosome imprinting and the mammalian X chromosome. Nature 253: 165-168.
10. Charlesworth B, (1978) Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 5618-5622.
11. Charlesworth B, (1996) The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Current Biology 6: 149-162.
12. Simmons MJ, Crow JF, (1977) Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Ann Rev Genet 11: 49-78.
13. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, (1999) The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res 74: 329-340.
14. Charlesworth B, Hughes KA (1999) The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits. Pp. 369-392 in RS Singh and CB Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology, vol. 1 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Halligan DL, Keightley PD, (2009) Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 151-172.
16. Lyon MF, (1988) The William Allan Memorial Award Address: X-chromosome inactivation and the location and expression of X-linked genes. Am J Hum Genet 42: 8-16.
17. Moore T, Haig D, (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends in Genetics 7: 45-49.
18. Haig D, (2006) Self-imposed silence: parental antagonism and the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation. Evolution 60: 440-447.
19. Engelstädter J, Haig D, (2008) Sexual antagonism and the evolution of X chromosome inactivation. Evolution 62: 2097-2104.
20. Mank JE, (2009) The W, X, Y and Z of sex-chromosome dosage compensation. Trends Genet 25: 226-233.
21. Crow JF, Kimura M, (1965) Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am Nat 99: 439-450.
22. Charlesworth B, (1991) When to be diploid. Nature 351: 273-274.
23. Kondrashov AS, Crow JF, (1991) Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? Nature 351: 314-315.
24. Perrot V, Richerd S, Valéro M, (1991) Transition from haploidy to diploidy. Nature 351: 315-317.
25. Otto SP, Gerstein AC, (2008) The evolution of haploidy and diploidy. Current Biology 18: R1121-R1124.
26. Otto SP, Goldstein DB, (1992) Recombination and the evolution of diploidy. Genetics 131: 745-751.
27. Bengtsson BO, (1992) Deleterious mutations and the origin of the meiotic ploidy cycle. Genetics 131: 741-744.
28. Jenkins CD, Kirkpatrick M, (1995) Deleterious mutation and the evolution of genetic life cycles. Evolution 49: 512-520.
29. Otto SP, Marks JC, (1996) Mating systems and the evolutionary transition between haploid and diploidy. Biol J Linnean Soc 57: 197-218.
30. Hall DW, (2000) The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation. Genetics 156: 893-898.
31. Orr HA, (1995) Somatic mutation favors the evolution of diploidy. Genetics 139: 1441-1447.
32. Vicoso B, Charlesworth B, (2006) Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes. Nat Rev Genet 7: 645-653.
33. Whitlock MC, Agrawal AF, (2009) Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63: 569-582.
34. Connallon T, Cox RM, Calsbeek R, (2010) Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64: 1671-1682.
35. Mallet MA, Bouchard JM, Kimber CM, Chippindale AK, (2011) Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females. BMC Evol Biol 11: 156.
36. Sharp NP, Agrawal AF, (2012) Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01834.x.
37. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF, (2009) Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 280-288.
38. van Doorn GS, (2009) Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann NY Acad Sci 1168: 52-71.
39. Kidwell JF, Clegg MT, Stewart FM, Prout T, (1977) Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes. Genetics 85: 171-183.
40. Day T, Bonduriansky R, (2004) Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167: 1537-1546.
41. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A, (1999) Sex specific X chromosome expression caused by genomic imprinting. J Theor Biol 197: 487-495.
42. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A, (2001) The evolution of X-linked genomic imprinting. Genetics 158: 1801-1809.
43. Seymour RM, Pomiankowski A, (2006) ESS gene expression of X-linked imprinted genes subject to sexual selection. J Theor Biol 241: 81-93.
44. Van Cleve J, Feldman MW, (2007) Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting. Genetics 176: 1101-1118.
45. Mable BK, Otto SP, (1998) The evolution of life cycles with haploid and diploid phases. Bio Essays 20: 453-462.
46. Otto SP, Day T (2007) A biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. Princeton University press, Princeton, NJ.
47. Dobyns WB, Filauro A, Tomson BN, Chan AS, Allen WH, Ting NT, Oosterwijk JC, Ober C, (2004) Inheritance of most X-linked traits is not dominant or recessive, just X-linked. Am J Med Genet 129A: 136-143.
48. Ravigné V, Dieckmann U, Olivieri I, (2009) Live where you thrive: joint evolution of habitat choice and local adaptation facilitates specialization and promotes diversity. Am Nat 174: E141-E169.
49. Connallon T, Clark AG, (2011) The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication. Genetics 187: 919-937.
50. Guillaume F, Otto SP, (2012) Gene functional trade-offs and the evolution of pleiotropy. Genetics 192: 1389-1409.
51. Mank JE, Vicoso B, Berlin S, Charlesworth B, (2010) Effective population size and the faster-X effect: Empiricial results and their interpretation. Evolution 64: 663-674.
52. Santure AW, Spencer H, (2012) Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes. Genetics 192: 1455-1464.
53. Cooper DW, (1976) Studies on metatherian sex chromosomes II: the improbability of a stable balanced polymorphism at an X-linked locus with the paternal X inactivation system of kangaroos. Aust J Biol Sci 29: 245-250.
54. Patten MM, Haig D, (2009) Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism at a sex-linked locus. Evolution 63: 2888-2895.
55. Connallon T, Clark AG, (2012) A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation. Genetics 190: 1477-1489.
56. Mullon C, Pomiankowski A, Reuter M, (2012) The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution 66: 3743-3753.
57. Mank JE, Hosken DJ, Wedell N, (2011) Some inconvenient truths about sex chromosome dosage compensation and the potential role of sexual conflict. Evolution 65: 2133-2144.
58. Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR, (2001) Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1671-1675.
59. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA, (2004) Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429: 65-67.
60. Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB, (2007) Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447: 1107-1110.
61. Brommer JE, Kirkpatrick M, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L, (2007) The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection. PLoS ONE 2: e744 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000744.
62. Cox RM, Calsbeek R, (2010) Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict. Science 328: 92-94.
63. Innocenti P, Morrow EH, (2010) The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol 8: e1000335 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000335.
64. Mokkonen M, Kokko H, Koskela E, Lehtonen J, Mappes T, Martiskainen H, Mills SC, (2011) Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science 334: 972-974.
65. Delph LF, Andicoechea J, Steven JC, Herlihy CR, Scarpino SV, Bell DL, (2011) Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict in a dioecious plant. New Phytologist 192: 542-552.
66. Lewis Z, Wedell N, Hunt J, (2011) Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth. Evolution 65: 2085-2097.
67. Haldane JBS, (1937) The effect of variation on fitness. Am Nat 71: 337-349.
68. Spencer HG, Williams MJM, (1997) The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models. Theor Pop Biol 51: 23-35.
69. Otto SP, Yong P, (2002) The evolution of gene duplicates. Homol Eff 46: 451-483.
70. Connallon T, Clark AG, (2010) Gene duplication, gene conversion and the evolution of the Y chromosome. Genetics 186: 277-286.
71. Rice WR, (1984) Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
72. Barlow DP, (2011) Genomic imprinting: a mammalian epigenetic discovery model. Annu Rev Genet 45: 379-403.
73. Spencer HG, Feldman MW, Clark AG, (1998) Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 148: 893-904.
74. Spencer HG, Clark AG, Feldman MW, (1999) Genetic conflicts and the evolutionary origin of genomic imprinting. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 197-201.
75. Haig D, (2000) The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31: 9-32.
76. Wilkins JF, Haig D, (2003) What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 4: 359-368.
77. Spencer HG, Feldman MW, Clark AG, Weisstein AE, (2004) The effect of genetic conflict on genomic imprinting and modification of expression at a sex-linked locus. Genetics 166: 565-579.
78. Brandvain Y, (2010) Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes. Am Nat 176: 511-521.
79. Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J, Ubeda F, Wilkins JF, (2011) Demography, kinship, and the evolving theory of genomic imprinting. Trends Genet 27: 251-257.
80. Maynard Smith M, Price GR, (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246: 15-18.
81. Rozowsky J, Abyzov A, Wang J, Alves P, Raha D, Harmanci A, Leng J, Bjornson R, Kong Y, Kitabayashi N, Bhardwaj N, Rubin M, Snyder M, Gerstein M, (2011) AlleleSeq: analysis of allele-specific expression and binding in a network framework. Mol Syst Biol 7: 522.
82. Clerc P, Avner P, (2006) Random X-chromosome inactivation: skewing lessons for mice and men. Curr Op Genet Dev 16: 246-253.
83. Thorvaldsen JL, Krapp C, Huntington FW, Bartolomei MS, (2012) Nonrandom X chromosome inactivation is influenced by multiple regions of the murine X chromosome. Genetics 192: 1095-1107.
84. Otto SP, Bourguet D, (1999) Balanced polymorphisms and the evolution of dominance. Am Nat 153: 561-574.
85. Hough J, Immler S, Barrett SCH, Otto SP, (2013) Evolutionary stable sex ratios and mutation load. Evolution in press.
86. Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC, (2011) Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data? Genetics 178: 553-566.
87. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
88. Weckerly FW, (1998) Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. J Mammology 79: 33-52.
89. Lindenfors P, Gittleman JL, Jones KE (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in mammals. In Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T, eds. Sex, Size and Gender Roles, pp. 16-26. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
90. Mukai T, (1969) The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VIII. Natural selection on the degree of dominance of viability polygenes. Genetics 63: 467-478.
91. Lande R, Schemske DW, (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
92. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, (1998) Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations. Genetica 102/103: 3-19.
93. Ellegren H, (2007) Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation. Proc Roy Soc B 274: 1-10.
94. Sayres MA, Makova KD, (2011) Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species. Bioessays 33: 938-945.
95. Hollis B, Houle D, (2011) Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 24: 1918-1926.
96. Arbuthnott D, Rundle HD, (2012) Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 66: 2127-2137.
97. Cox RM, Calsbeek R, (2009) Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am Nat 173: 176-187.