Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict

Science

Volumn 328, Issue 5974, 2010, Pages 92-94

  Cox, Robert M ^a   Calsbeek, Ryan ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CRYPSIS; FITNESS; LIZARD; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FITNESS; GENETIC SELECTION; LIZARD; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; LIZARDS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ANOLIS SAGREI; SQUAMATA;

EID: 77950470209     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1185550     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. M. Cox, R. Calsbeek, Am. Nat. 173, 176 (2009).
2. R. Lande, Evolution 34, 292 (1980).
3. L. F. Delph, J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, M. Levri, Evolution 58, 1936 (2004).
4. D. J. Fairbairn, D. A. Roff, Heredity 97, 319 (2006).
5. S. Bedhomme, A. K. Chippindale, in Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism, D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Btanckenhom, T. Szekely,Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2007), pp. 185-194.
6. T. Chapman, G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, L. Rowe, Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41 (2003).
7. G. Arnqvist, L. Rowe, Sexual Conflid (Monographs in Behavior and Ecology, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).
8. K. Foerster, et al., Nature 447, 1107 (2007).
9. A. Pischedda, A. K. Chippindale, PLoS Biol. A, e356 (2006).
10. T. Connallon, E. Jakubowski, Evolution 63, 2179 (2009).
11. K. M. Fedorka, T. A. Mousseau, Nature 429, 65 (2004).
12. A. K. Chippindale, J. R. Gibson, W. R. Rice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671 (2001).
13. R. Calsbeek, B. Sinervo, ;. Evol. Biol. 17, 464 (2004).
14. W. R. Rice, A. K. Chippindale,;. Evol. Biol. 14, 865 (2001).
15. S. R. Pryke, S. C. Griffith, Science 323, 1605 (2009).
16. R. M. Cox, D. S. Stenquist, R. Calsbeek, ;. Evol. Biol. 22, 1586 (2009).
17. R. M. Cox, R. Calsbeek, Evolution 64, 798 (2010).
18. R. Calsbeek, C. Bonneaud, Evolution 62, 1137 (2008).
19. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Sdence Online.
20. R. R. Tokarz, Herpetologica 54, 388 (1998).
21. R. L. Trivers, Evolution 30, 253 (1976).
22. W. F. Rice, Evolution 38, 735 (1984).
23. J. R. Gibson, A. K. Chippindale, W. R. Rice, Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 499 (2002).
24. G. C. Gorman, L. Atkins, Am. Nat. 100, 579 (1966).
25. F. J. Janzen, P. C. Phillips,;. Evol. Biol. 19, 1775 (2006).
26. M. Kirkpatrick, D. W. Hall, Evolution 58, 683 (2004).
27. R. Bonduriansky, L. Rowe, Evolution 59, 1965 (2005).
28. E. I. Svensson, A. G. McAdam, B. Sinervo, Evolution 63, 3124 (2009).
29. J. Poissant, A. J. Wilson, D. W. Coltman, Evolution 64, 97 (2010).
30. We thank M. C. Duryea and M. Najarro for genotyping samples and conducting paternity analyses and M. Callahan, D. Cheney, and L. Symes for assistance with mating trails and animal care. M. C. Duryea, S. Kuchta, M. Logan, M. Najarro, and D. Urbach provided comments on the manuscript. Research was conducted under permits from the Bahamas Ministry of Agriculture and approval from the Dartmouth College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 07-02-03). An award from NSF (DEB 0816862 to R. Calsbeek) and funding from Dartmouth College provided financial support.