Comparison of artificial neural network models for sediment yield prediction at single gauging station of watershed in eastern India

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 115-120

  Singh, Ajai ^a   Imtiyaz, Mohd ^b   Isaac, R K ^b   Denis, D M ^b  

^a UTTAR BANGA KRISHI VISWAVIDYALAYA   (India)

^b Technology and Science   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Radial base neural network; Runoff sediment modeling; Standard back propagation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FORESTED WATERSHEDS; LINEAR COEFFICIENTS; NEURAL NETWORK MODEL; RADIAL BASIS NEURAL NETWORKS; ROOT-MEAN SQUARE ERRORS;

BACKPROPAGATION; FLOODS; LANDFORMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RUNOFF; SEDIMENTS; WATERSHEDS;

SEDIMENTOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION; FORECASTING METHOD; MODELING; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT YIELD; WATERSHED;

INDIA;

EID: 84876838740     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000601     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agarwal, A., Rai, R. K., and Upadhyay, A. (2009). "Forecasting of runoff and sediment yield using artificial neural networks." J. Water Res. Protect., 1(05), 368-375.
2. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000a). "Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts." J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 115-123.
3. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000b). "Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications." J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 124-137.
4. Cigizoglu, H. K., and Kisi, O. (2006). "Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation." J. Hydrol., 317(3-4), 221-238.
5. Dawson, C. W., and Wilby, R. L. (1998). "An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling." Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(1), 47-65.
6. Dawson, C. W., and Wilby, R. L. (2001). "Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks." Prog. Phys. Geog., 25(1), 80-108.
7. De Farias, C. A. S., Alves, F. M., Santos, C. A. G., and Koichi, S. (2010). "An ANN-based approach to modelling sediment yield: a case study in a semi-arid area of Brazil." Proc., ICCE Symp.: Sediment Dynamics for a Changing Future, International Commission on Continental Erosion, Rennes, France, 337, 316-321.
8. DTREG Predictive Modeling Software [Computer software]. (2009). Phillip H. Sherrod, www.dtreg.com (May 31, 2009).
9. El-swaify, S. A., Dangler, E. W., and Armstrong, C. L. (1982). Soil erosion by water in tropics, Univ. of Hawaii, College of Agriculture, Research Extension Series 24, Honolulu, 15-48.
10. Giustolisi, O., and Laucelli, D. (2005). "Improving generalization of artificial neural networks in rainfall-runoff modeling." Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(3), 439-457.
11. Hsu, K. L., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). "Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process." Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2517-2530.
12. Jain, A., and Srinivasulu, S. (2006). "Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques." J. Hydrol., 317(3-4), 291-306.
13. Kaur, R., Srinivasan, R., Mishra, K., Dutta, D., Prasad, D., and Bansal, G. (2003). "Assessment of a SWAT model for soil and water management in India." Land Use Water Resour. Res., 3, 1-7.
14. Lorrai, M., and Sechi, G. M. (1995). "Neural nets for modelling rainfallrunoff transformations." Water Res. Manage., 9(4), 299-313.
15. Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C. (2000). "Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modelling issues and applications." Environ. Modell. Softw., 15(1), 101-124.
16. Minns, A.W., and Hall, M. J. (1996). "Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models." Hydrol. Sci. J., 41(3), 399-417.
17. Mutlu, E., Chaubey, I., Hexmoor, H., and Bajwa, S. G. (2008). "Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural watershed." Hydrol. Processes, 22(26), 50-97.
18. Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). "River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles." J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282-290.
19. NeuralWorks Professional II/Plus [Computer software]. NeuralWare, Pittsburgh.
20. Raghuwanshi, N. S., Singh, R., and Reddy, L. S. (2006). Runoff and sediment yield modeling using artificial neural networks: Upper Siwane River, India. J. Hydrol. Eng., 11(1), 71-79.
21. Rajurkar, M. P., Kothyari, U. C., and Chaube, U. C. (2002). "Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modelling." Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(6), 865-877.
22. Sarangi, A., and Bhattacharya, A. K. (2005). "Comparison of artificial neural network and regression models for sediment loss prediction from Banha watershed in India." Agric. Water Manage., 78(3), 195-208.
23. Tokar, A. S., and Johnson, P. A. (1999). "Rainfall runoff modeling using artificial neural networks." J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(3), 232-239.
24. Wang, Y. M., Kerh, T., and Traore, S. (2009). "Neural networks approaches for modelling river suspended sediment concentration due to tropical storms." Global NEST J., 11(4), 457-466.
25. Wilby, R. L., Abrahart, R. J., and Dawson, C. W. (2003). "Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network." Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(2), 163-181.
26. Yenigün, K., Mahmut, B., Reşit, G., and Mehmet, M. (2010). "A comparative study on prediction of sediment yield in the Euphrates Basin." Int. J. Phys. Sci., 5(5), 518-534.