Stylometric analysis of scientific articles

NAACL HLT 2012 - 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 327-337

  Bergsma, Shane ^a   Post, Matt ^a   Yarowsky, David ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SYNTACTICS;

BAG-OF-WORDS MODELS; ERROR REDUCTION; NON-NATIVE; RELATIVE ERRORS; SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES; STRONG CORRELATION; STYLOMETRICS; STYLOMETRY; SYNTACTIC FEATURES;

FORECASTING;

EID: 84876807328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Shlomo Argamon, Moshe Koppel, Jonathan Fine, and Anat Rachel Shimoni. 2003. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23(3), August.
2. Harald Baayen, Fiona Tweedie, and Hans van Halteren. 1996. Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(3):121-132.
3. Alessandro Bergamo and Lorenzo Torresani. 2010. Exploiting weakly-labeled web images to improve object classification: a domain adaptation approach. In Proc. NIPS, pages 181-189.
4. Shane Bergsma and Dekang Lin. 2006. Bootstrapping path-based pronoun resolution. In Proc. Coling-ACL, pages 33-40.
5. Christine L. Borgman and Jonathan Furner. 2001. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36:3-72.
6. Eugene Charniak and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarse-tofine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proc. ACL, pages 173-180.
7. Colin Cherry and Chris Quirk. 2008. Discriminative, syntactic language modeling through latent SVMs. In Proc. AMTA.
8. Martin Chodorow, Joel R. Tetreault, and Na-Rae Han. 2007. Detection of grammatical errors involving prepositions. In Proc. ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions, pages 25-30.
9. Trevor Cohn, Phil Blunsom, and Sharon Goldwater. 2010. Inducing tree-substitution grammars. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 11:3053-3096.
10. Robert Dale and Adam Kilgarriff. 2010. Helping our own: Text massaging for computational linguistics as a new shared task. In Proc. 6th International Natural Language Generation Conference, pages 261-265.
11. Jacob Eisenstein, Noah A. Smith, and Eric P. Xing. 2011. Discovering sociolinguistic associations with structured sparsity. In Proc. ACL, pages 1365-1374.
12. Dominique Estival, Tanja Gaustad, Son-Bao Pham, Will Radford, and Ben Hutchinson. 2007. Author profiling for English emails. In Proc. PACLING, pages 263-272.
13. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9:1871-1874.
14. Rachele De Felice and Stephen G. Pulman. 2007. Automatically acquiring models of preposition use. In Proc. ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions, pages 45-50.
15. Michael Gamon. 2004. Linguistic correlates of style: authorship classification with deep linguistic analysis features. In Proc. Coling, pages 611-617.
16. Michael Gamon. 2010. Using mostly native data to correct errors in learners' writing: a meta-classifier approach. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, pages 163-171.
17. Sean Gerrish and David M. Blei. 2010. A languagebased approach to measuring scholarly impact. In Proc. ICML, pages 375-382.
18. Angela Glover and Graeme Hirst. 1995. Detecting stylistic inconsistencies in collaborative writing. In Writers at work: Professional writing in the computerized environment, pages 147-168.
19. David Hall, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 363-371.
20. Na-Rae Han, Martin Chodorow, and Claudia Leacock. 2006. Detecting errors in English article usage by nonnative speakers. Nat. Lang. Eng., 12(2):115-129.
21. Shawndra Hill and Foster Provost. 2003. The myth of the double-blind review?: Author identification using only citations. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 5:179-184.
22. Graeme Hirst and Ol'ga Feiguina. 2007. Bigrams of syntactic labels for authorship discrimination of short texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(4):405-417.
23. Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In Proc. ICML, pages 200-209.
24. Nikhil Johri, Daniel Ramage, Daniel McFarland, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2011. A study of academic collaborations in computational linguistics using a latent mixture of authors model. In Proc. 5th ACL-HLT Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pages 124-132.
25. Aravind K. Joshi and Yves Schabes. 1997. Treeadjoining grammars. In G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages: Beyond Words, volume 3, pages 71-122.
26. Moshe Koppel, Shlomo Argamon, and Anat Rachel Shimoni. 2003. Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(4):401-412.
27. Moshe Koppel, Jonathan Schler, and Kfir Zigdon. 2005. Determining an author's native language by mining a text for errors. In Proc. KDD, pages 624-628.
28. Xuan Le, Ian Lancashire, Graeme Hirst, and Regina Jokel. 2011. Longitudinal detection of dementia through lexical and syntactic changes in writing: A case study of three British novelists. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(4):435-461.
29. Frederick Mosteller and David L. Wallace. 1984. Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of the Federalist Papers. Springer-Verlag.
30. Greg Myers. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1):1-35.
31. Daisuke Okanohara and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2007. A discriminative language model with pseudo-negative samples. In Proc. ACL, pages 73-80.
32. Myle Ott, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2011. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proc. ACL, pages 309-319.
33. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 79-86.
34. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proc. Coling-ACL, pages 433-440.
35. Xuan-Hieu Phan. 2006. CRFTagger: CRF English POS Tagger. crftagger.sourceforge.net.
36. Matt Post and Daniel Gildea. 2009. Bayesian learning of a tree substitution grammar. In Proc. ACL-IJCNLP, pages 45-48.
37. Matt Post. 2011. Judging grammaticality with tree substitution grammar derivations. In Proc. ACL, pages 217-222.
38. Vahed Qazvinian and Dragomir R. Radev. 2008. Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In Proc. Coling, pages 689-696.
39. Dragomir R. Radev, Mark Thomas Joseph, Bryan Gibson, and Pradeep Muthukrishnan. 2009a. A bibliometric and network analysis of the field of computational linguistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
40. Dragomir R. Radev, Pradeep Muthukrishnan, and Vahed Qazvinian. 2009b. The ACL anthology network corpus. In Proc. ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval for Digital Libraries, pages 54-61.
41. Sindhu Raghavan, Adriana Kovashka, and Raymond Mooney. 2010. Authorship attribution using probabilistic context-free grammars. In Proc. ACL, pages 38-42.
42. Delip Rao, Michael Paul, Clay Fink, David Yarowsky, Timothy Oates, and Glen Coppersmith. 2011. Hierarchical bayesian models for latent attribute detection in social media. In Proc. ICWSM, pages 598-601.
43. Ruchita Sarawgi, Kailash Gajulapalli, and Yejin Choi. 2011. Gender attribution: tracing stylometric evidence beyond topic and genre. In Proc. CoNLL, pages 78-86.
44. Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv., 34:1-47.
45. Efstathios Stamatatos, Nikos Fakotakis, and George Kokkinakis. 2001. Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):471-495.
46. Joel R. Tetreault and Martin Chodorow. 2008. The ups and downs of preposition error detection in ESL writing. In Proc. Coling, pages 865-872.
47. Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles - experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):409-445.
48. Laura Mayfield Tomokiyo and Rosie Jones. 2001. You're not from 'round here, are you? Naive Bayes detection of non-native utterances. In Proc. NAACL.
49. Oren Tsur and Ari Rappoport. 2007. Using classifier features for studying the effect of native language on the choice of written second language words. In Proc. Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition, pages 9-16.
50. Irena Vassileva. 1998. Who am I/who are we in academic writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2):163-185.
51. Sze-Meng Jojo Wong and Mark Dras. 2011. Exploiting parse structures for native language identification. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 1600-1610.
52. Dani Yogatama, Michael Heilman, Brendan O'Connor, Chris Dyer, Bryan R. Routledge, and Noah A. Smith. 2011. Predicting a scientific community's response to an article. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 594-604.
53. G. Udny Yule. 1939. On sentence-length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose: With application to two cases of disputed authorship. Biometrika, 30(3/4):363-390.