Judging grammaticality with tree substitution grammar derivations

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 217-222

  Post, Matt ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DISCOVERY; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DATA SETS; FEATURE SETS; LOCAL FEATURE; N-GRAM LANGUAGE MODELS; PARSE TREES; RE-RANKING; TREE PATTERN; TREE SUBSTITUTION GRAMMARS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BINARY TREES;

ALGORITHMS; FORESTRY; LANGUAGES; TRANSLATION;

EID: 84859021540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Mohit Bansal and Dan Klein. 2010. Simple, accurate parsing with an all-fragments grammar. In Proc. ACL, Uppsala, Sweden, July.
2. Rens Bod. 1993. Using an annotated corpus as a stochastic grammar. In Proc. ACL, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
3. Rens Bod. 2001. What is the minimal set of fragments that achieves maximal parse accuracy? In Proc. ACL, Toulouse, France, July.
4. Eugene Charniak and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarse-tofine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proc. ACL, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, June.
5. Eugene Charniak. 1996. Tree-bank grammars. In Proc. of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
6. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proc. NAACL, Seattle, Washington, USA, April-May.
7. Colin Cherry and Chris Quirk. 2008. Discriminative, syntactic language modeling through latent svms. In Proc. AMTA, Waikiki, Hawaii, USA, October.
8. Trevor Cohn, Sharon. Goldwater, and Phil Blunsom. 2009. Inducing compact but accurate tree-substitution grammars. In Proc. NAACL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, June.
9. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871-1874.
10. Jennifer Foster and Øistein E. Andersen. 2009. Generrate: generating errors for use in grammatical error detection. In Proceedings of the fourth workshop on innovative use of nlp for building educational applications, pages 82-90. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Jennifer Foster and Carl Vogel. 2004. Good reasons for noting bad grammar: Constructing a corpus of ungrammatical language. In Pre-Proceedings of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives.
12. Joshua Goodman. 1996. Efficient algorithms for parsing the DOP model. In Proc. EMNLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, May.
13. Liang Huang. 2008. Forest reranking: Discriminative parsing with non-local features. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Columbus, Ohio, June.
14. Mark Johnson. 1998. PCFG models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics, 24(4):613-632. (Pubitemid 128455527)
15. Aravind K. Joshi and Yves Schabes. 1997. Treeadjoining grammars. In G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages: Beyond Words, volume 3, pages 71-122.
16. Mitchell P. Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational linguistics, 19(2):330.
17. Andrew Mutton, Mark Dras, Stephen Wan, and Robert Dale. 2007. Gleu: Automatic evaluation of sentencelevel fluency. In Proc. ACL, volume 45, page 344.
18. Franz Josef Och, Daniel Gildea, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Anoop Sarkar, Kenji Yamada, Alex Fraser, Shankar Kumar, Libin Shen, David Smith, Katherine Eng, et al. 2004. A smorgasbord of features for statistical machine translation. In Proc. NAACL.
19. Daisuke Okanohara and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2007. A discriminative language model with pseudo-negative samples. In Proc. ACL, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
20. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proc. COLING/ACL, Sydney, Australia, July.
21. Matt Post and Daniel Gildea. 2009a. Bayesian learning of a tree substitution grammar. In Proc. ACL (short paper track), Suntec, Singapore, August.
22. Matt Post and Daniel Gildea. 2009b. Language modeling with tree substitution grammars. In NIPS workshop on Grammar Induction, Representation of Language, and Language Learning, Whistler, British Columbia.
23. Matt Post. 2010. Syntax-based Language Models for Statistical Machine Translation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester.
24. Remko Scha. 1990. Taaltheorie en taaltechnologie; competence en performance. In R. de Kort and G.L.J. Leerdam, editors, Computertoepassingen in de neerlandistiek, pages 7-22, Almere, the Netherlands.
25. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proc. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
26. Ghihua Sun, Xiaohua Liu, Gao Cong, Ming Zhou, Zhongyang Xiong, John Lee, and Chin-Yew Lin. 2007. Detecting erroneous sentences using automatically mined sequential patterns. In Proc. ACL, volume 45.
27. JoachimWagner, Jennifer Foster, and Josef van Genabith. 2009. Judging grammaticality: Experiments in sentence classification. CALICO Journal, 26(3):474-490.
28. Sze-Meng Jojo Wong and Mark Dras. 2010. Parser features for sentence grammaticality classification. In Proc. Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, December.
29. Andreas Zollmann and Khalil Sima'an. 2005. A consistent and efficient estimator for Data-Oriented Parsing. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 10(2/3):367-388.
30. Willem Zuidema. 2007. Parsimonious Data-Oriented Parsing. In Proc. EMNLP, Prague, Czech Republic, June.