Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L: A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in english, german, french, russian and bulgarian

International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 163-185

  Vassileva, Irena ^a,b  

^a SOUTH WEST UNIVERSITY NEOFIT RILSKI   (Bulgaria)

^b NONE   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937188663     PISSN: 08026106     EISSN: 14734192     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1986) The problem of speech genres and the problem of the text in linguistics, philology and the human sciences: an experiment in philosophical analysis. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (eds.) Bakhtin: speech genres and other late essays. [Trans. V. McGee.] Austin : University of Texas Press. 250–317.
2. Baumeister, R.F. (1986) Identity: cultural change and the struggle for the self. New York : Oxford University Press.
3. Beneš E. (1981) Die formale Struktur der wissenschaftlichen Fachsprachen in syntaktischer Hinsicht [‘The formal structure of the language of science from a syntactic point of view’]. In T. Bungarten (ed.) Wissenschaftssprache. München : Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 185–212.
4. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. [1978] (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
5. Clyne, M. (1993) Pragmatik, Textstruktur und kulturelle Werte. Eine interkulturelle Perspektive [‘Pragmatics, text structure and cultural values. An intercultural perspective’]. In H. Schröder (ed.) Fachtextpragmatik. Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag. 3–18.
6. Clyne, M. (1996) The German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge University Press.
7. Daskalov, R. (1994) Nazionalno-kulturnata ni identičnost: način na izgražhdane [‘Our national and cultural identity: the way of developing it’]. In I. Elenkov & R. Daskalov (eds.) Zaštosme takiva? Sofia : Prosveta.
8. Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and power. London : Longman.
9. Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and social change. Cambridge : Polity Press.
10. Fairclough, N. (ed.) (1992b) Critical language awareness. London : Longman.
11. Fiedler, S. (1994) Linguistische Fachtexte im Englischen, Deutschen und Esperanto (ein interkultureller Vergleich) [‘Special texts in linguistics in English, German and Esperanto (an intercultural comparison)’]. In B. Spillner (ed.) Fachkommunikation. Forum Angewandte Linguistik. Bd.27. Tübingen : Peter Narr Verlag. 68–71.
12. Galtung, J. (1985) Struktur, Kultur und intellektueller Stil. Ein verhleichender Essay über sachsonische, teutonische, gallische und nipponische Wissenschaft [‘Structure, culture and intellectual style. A comparative essay of Saxon, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic science’]. In A. Wierlacher (ed.) Das Fremde und das Eigene. München : Judicium-Verlag. 151–93.
13. Halliday, M. (1985) Aa introduction to functional grammar. London : Edward Arnold.
14. Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London : Longman.
15. Haverkate, H. (1983) Strategies in linguistic action. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 637–56.
16. Heslot, J. (1983) Récit et Commentaire dans un article scientifique [‘Story and commentary in the scientific article’]. DRLAV: 133–54.
17. Iliev, A. (1994) Narodnostnoto obosobjavane na balgarskata kultura (1936) [‘The national formation of Bulgarian culture’]. In I. Elenkov & R. Daskalov (eds.) Zaštosme takiva? Sofia : Prosveta. 309–16.
18. Ivanic, R. (1992) I is for Interpersonal: the discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. [Centre for Language in Social Life Working Papers Series N42.] Lancaster University.
19. Ivanic, R. & Simpson. J. (1992) Who's who in academic writing? In N. Fairclough (ed.) Critical language awareness. London : Longman. 141–73.
20. Kresta, R. (1992) Interpersonal Sprachmittel in Fachtexten der Linguistik [‘Interpersonal linguistic means in the language of linguistics’]. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 4.4: 239–44.
21. Loffler-Laurian, A.-M. (1980) L'expression du locuteur dans les discours scientifiques [‘The expression of the speaker in scientific discourse’]. Revue de Linguistique romane 44: 135–57.
22. Mauranen, A. (1993) Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economic texts. English for Specific Purposes. 12: 3–22.
23. Myers, G. (1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10.1: 1–35.
24. Panther, K.-U. (1981) Einige typische indirekte sprachliche Handlungen in wissenschaftlichem Diskurs [‘Some typical indirect speech acts in scientific discourse’]. In T. Bungarten (ed.) Wissenschaftssprache. Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 231–60.
25. Raymond, J. C. (1993) I-dropping and androgyny: the authorial I in scholarly writing. College Composition and Communication 44.4: 478–83.
26. Reynolds, M. (1994) “Knowing how to go on”: genre analysis and cross-cultural rhetoric. Unpublished paper given at the XXVIII International Conference on Cross-Language Studies and Contrastive linguistics. Rydzyna, Poland, December 1994.
27. Spillner, B. (1989) Stilelemente im fachsprachlichen Diskurs [‘Interlingual stylistic contrasts in the languages of science’]. In W. Dahmen et. al. (eds.) Technische Sprache und Technolekte in der Romania. Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag. 2–19.
28. Spillner, B. (1996) Interlinguale Stilkontraste in Fachsprachen [‘Elements of style in scientific discourse’]. In B. Spillner (ed.) Stil in Fachsprachen. Peter Lang. 105–37.
29. Swales, J. (1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.
30. Vassileva, I. (1995) Some aspects of the rhetorical structure of specialized written discourse in English, Bulgarian and Russian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5.2: 173–90.
31. Vassileva, I. (1996a) Academic discourse rhetoric and the Bulgarian-English interlanguage. Foreign Language Teaching Journal (Sofia) 6/1995: 4–17, 1/1996: 19–29, 2/1996: 4–21. 3-4/1996: 113–128.
32. th World Congress of AILA, Jyvaskyla, Finland, August 4–9, 1996.
33. Vassileva, I. (1997) Rhetorical structure of scientific texts in English. German, Russian and Bulgarian. Unpublished project work financed by DAAD.
34. Wüest, J. (1988) Textsorten kontrastiv betrachtet. Die Präsenz des Autors in linguistischen Publikationen [‘Text types from a contrastive point of view. The presence of the author in publications in lingistics’]. In G. Wotjak (ed.) Studium zur Sprachkonfrontation [Linguistische Studium, Reihe A, Arbeitsberichte 176]. Berlin. 125–38.