Training Dependency Parsers from Partially Annotated Corpora

IJCNLP 2011 - Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 776-784

  Flannery, Daniel ^a   Miyao, Yusuke ^b   Neubig, Graham ^a   Mori, Shinsuke ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

% REDUCTIONS; DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DEPENDENCY TREES; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; LINGUISTIC RESOURCES; MAXIMUM SPANNING-TREE; POINTWISE APPROACH; REAL WORLD SITUATIONS; TRAINING DATA;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84876801167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Adam L. Berger, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Stephen A. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
2. John Blitzer, Ryan McDonald, and Fernando Pereira. 2006. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 120-128.
3. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 149-164.
4. Daniel Gildea. 2001. Corpus variation and parser performance. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 167-202.
5. Ryu Iida, Mamoru Komachi, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2007. Annotating a Japanese text corpus with predicate-argument and coreference relations. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 132-139.
6. Donald Keene, Hiroyoshi Hatori, Haruko Yamada, and Shouko Irabu. 1992. Japanese-English Sentence Equivalents (in Japanese). Asahi Press, Electronic book edition.
7. Taku Kudo and Yuji Matsumoto. 2002. Japanese dependency analysis using cascaded chunking. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, volume 25, pages 1-7.
8. Percy Liang, Hal Daumé III, and Dan Klein. 2008. Structure compilation: trading structure for features. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 592-599.
9. Kikuo Maekawa. 2008. Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Asian Language Resources, pages 101-102.
10. David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 337-344.
11. Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, and Jan Hajič. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 523-530.
12. Yusuke Miyao, Kenji Sagae, Rune Saetre, Takuya Matsuzaki, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2009. Evaluating contributions of natural language parsers to protein-protein interaction extraction. Bioinformatics, 25(3):394-400.
13. Toshiaki Nakazawa and Sadao Kurohashi. 2008. Linguistically-motivated tree-based probabilistic phrase alignment. In In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA2008).
14. Graham Neubig and Shinsuke Mori. 2010. Word-based partial annotation for efficient corpus construction. In Proceedings of the Seventh InternationalConferenceonLanguageResourcesandEvaluation.
15. Graham Neubig, Yosuke Nakata, and Shinsuke Mori. 2011. Pointwise prediction for robust, adaptable Japanese morphological analysis. In The 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Short Paper Track.
16. Joakim Nivre and Mario Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
17. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
18. Joachim Nivre, Johan Hall, Sandra Kübler, Ryan McDonald, Jens Nilsson, Sebastian Riedel, and Deniz Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007.
19. Miles Osborne and Jason Baldridge. 2004. Ensemble-based active learning for parse selection. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 89-96.
20. Slav Petrov, Pi-Chuan Chang, Michael Ringgaard, and Hiyan Alshawi. 2010. Uptraining for accurate deterministic question parsing. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 705-713.
21. Brian Roark and Michiel Bacchiani. 2003. Supervised and unsupervised PCFG adaptation to novel domains. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 126-133.
22. Manabu Sassano and Sadao Kurohashi. 2010. Using smaller constituents rather than sentences in active learning for Japanese dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 356-365.
23. Kathrin Spreyer and Jonas Kuhn. 2009. Data-driven dependency parsing of new languages using incomplete and noisy training data. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2009), pages 12-20.
24. Kathrin Spreyer, Lilja Øvrelid, and Jonas Kuhn. 2010. Training parsers on partial trees: a cross-language comparison. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
25. Jun Suzuki, Hideki Isozaki, Xavier Carreras, and Michael Collins. 2009. An empirical study of semi-supervised structured conditional models for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 551-560.
26. Min Tang, Xiaoqiang Luo, and Salim Roukos. 2002. Active learning for statistical natural language parsing. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 120-127.
27. Yuta Tsuboi, Hisashi Kashima, Shinsuke Mori, Hiroki Oda, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2008. Training conditional random fields using incomplete annotations. In Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
28. Qin Iris Wang, Dekang Lin, and Dale Schuurmans. 2007. Simple training of dependency parsers via structured boosting. In Proceedings of the TwentiethInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1756-1762.
29. Kenji Yamada and Kevin Knight. 2001. A syntax-based statistical machine translation model. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 523-530.