Tid1/Rdh54 translocase is phosphorylated through a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent manner in the presence of DSB lesions in budding yeast

DNA Repair

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 347-355

  Ferrari, Matteo ^a   Nachimuthu, Benjamin Tamilselvan ^b   Donnianni, Roberto Antonio ^c   Klein, Hannah ^d   Pellicioli, Achille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint adaptation; DNA damage; DNA recombination; Double strand break (DSB)

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CARRIER PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; MEC1 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; RDH54 TRANSLOCASE; TID1 TRANSLOCASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FUNGAL CELL CULTURE; FUNGAL STRAIN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA HELICASES; DNA TOPOISOMERASES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MUTATION, MISSENSE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84876729993     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Harrison J.C., Haber J.E. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2006, 40:209-235.
2. Pellicioli A., Lee S.E., Lucca C., Foiani M., Haber J.E. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:293-300.
3. Bartek J., Lukas J. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19:238-245.
4. Strebhardt K. Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9:643-660.
5. San Filippo J., Sung P., Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:229-257.
6. Shah P.P., Zheng X., Epshtein A., Carey J.N., Bishop D.K., et al. Swi2/Snf2-related translocases prevent accumulation of toxic Rad51 complexes during mitotic growth. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:862-872.
7. Shinohara M., Shita-Yamaguchi E., Buerstedde J.M., Shinagawa H., Ogawa H., et al. Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 1997, 147:1545-1556.
8. Klein H.L. RDH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Genetics 1997, 147:1533-1543.
9. Flott S., Kwon Y., Pigli Y.Z., Rice P.A., Sung P., et al. Regulation of Rad51 function by phosphorylation. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12:833-839.
10. Baroni E., Viscardi V., Cartagena-Lirola H., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:4151-4165.
11. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., et al. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 2000, 19:5027-5038.
12. Cheng L., Hunke L., Hardy C.F. Cell cycle regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae polo-like kinase cdc5p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18:7360-7370.
13. Longtine M.S., McKenzie A., Demarini D.J., Shah N.G., Wach A., et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14:953-961.
14. Kwon Y., Seong C., Chi P., Greene E.C., Klein H., et al. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologous recombination factor Rdh54. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:10445-10452.
15. Petukhova G., Sung P., Klein H. Promotion of Rad51-dependent D-loop formation by yeast recombination factor Rdh54/Tid1. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:2206-2215.
16. Vaze M.B., Pellicioli A., Lee S.E., Ira G., Liberi G., et al. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:373-385.
17. Fiorani S., Mimun G., Caleca L., Piccini D., Pellicioli A Characterization of the activation domain of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:493-499.
18. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., et al. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 1999, 18:6561-6572.
19. Donnianni R.A., Ferrari M., Lazzaro F., Clerici M., Tamilselvan Nachimuthu B., et al. Elevated levels of the polo kinase Cdc5 override the Mec1/ATR checkpoint in budding yeast by acting at different steps of the signaling pathway. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000763.
20. Albuquerque C.P., Smolka M.B., Payne S.H., Bafna V., Eng J., et al. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7:1389-1396.
21. Smolka M.B., Albuquerque C.P., Chen S.H., Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:10364-10369.
22. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431:1011-1017.
23. Janke R., Herzberg K., Rolfsmeier M., Mar J., Bashkirov V.I., et al. A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:2302-2313.
24. Lee S.E., Pellicioli A., Malkova A., Foiani M., Haber J.E. The Saccharomyces recombination protein Tid1p is required for adaptation from G2/M arrest induced by a double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:1053-1057.
25. Chi P., Kwon Y., Seong C., Epshtein A., Lam I., et al. Yeast recombination factor Rdh54 functionally interacts with the Rad51 recombinase and catalyzes Rad51 removal from DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:26268-26279.
26. Lee S.E., Pellicioli A., Vaze M.B., Sugawara N., Malkova A., et al. Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:8913-8923.
27. Prasad T.K., Robertson R.B., Visnapuu M.L., Chi P., Sung P., et al. A DNA-translocating Snf2 molecular motor: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rdh54 displays processive translocation and extrudes DNA loops. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369:940-953.
28. Niu H., Wan L., Busygina V., Kwon Y., Allen J.A., et al. Regulation of meiotic recombination via Mek1-mediated Rad54 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:393-404.
29. Chen S.H., Albuquerque C.P., Liang J., Suhandynata R.T., Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12803-12812.
30. Kalocsay M., Hiller N.J., Jentsch S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:335-343.