Erratum: Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins (BMC Evolutionary Biology (2013) 13 (88) DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-88);Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-4

  Kober, Kord M ^a,b   Bernardi, Giacomo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bering Strait; Holarctic expansion; Phylogenomics; Sea urchin; Strongylocentrotus; Vicariant divergence

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; ECHINODERM; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENOMICS; HOLARCTIC REGION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN; VICARIANCE;

BERING STRAIT;

ECHINOIDEA; STRONGYLOCENTROTIDAE; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS DROEBACHIENSIS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS INTERMEDIUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS PALLIDUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS PURPURATUS;

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SEA URCHIN; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; PHYLOGENY; SEA URCHINS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876710612     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0875-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (100)

1. Ecological role of purple Sea urchins. Pearse JS, Science 2006 314 940 941 10.1126/science.1131888 17095690
2. Soyer A, The Pantropheon: or, a history of food and its preparation in ancient times New York: Paddington Press 1977
3. The Sea urchin fishery: harvesting, processing and the market. Wilen JE, Reynolds JA, Mar Resour Econ 2000 15 115 126 10.1023/A:1008300206313
4. Ecology. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Berkes F, Hughes TP, Steneck RS, Wilson JA, Bellwood DR, Crona B, Folke C, Gunderson LH, Leslie HM, Norberg J, et al. Science 2006 311 1557 1558 10.1126/science.1122804 16543444
5. The sea urchin's siren. Pederson T, Dev Biol 2006 300 9 14 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.006 17113576
6. In the beginning.animal fertilization and sea urchin development. Briggs E, Wessel GM, Dev Biol 2006 300 15 26 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.014 17070796
7. High regulatory gene use in sea urchin embryogenesis: Implications for bilaterian development and evolution. Howard-Ashby M, Materna SC, Brown CT, Tu Q, Oliveri P, Cameron RA, Davidson EH, Dev Biol 2006 300 27 34 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.016 17101125
8. The Sea urchin genome: where will It lead Us? Davidson EH, Science 2006 314 939 940 10.1126/science.1136252 17095689
9. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Britten RJ, Davidson EH, Science 1969 165 349 357 10.1126/science.165.3891.349 5789433
10. Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Britten RJ, Science 1986 231 1393 1398 10.1126/science.3082006 3082006
11. Repeated sequences in DNA. Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms. Britten RJ, Kohne DE, Science 1968 161 529 540 10.1126/science.161.3841.529 4874239
12. Whole-genome positive selection and habitat-driven evolution in a shallow and a deep-Sea urchin. Oliver TA, Garfield DA, Manier MK, Haygood R, Wray GA, Palumbi SR, Genome Biol Evol 2010 2 800 814 10.1093/gbe/evq063 20935062
13. Positive Darwinian selection in gamete recognition proteins of Strongylocentrotus sea urchins. Pujolar JM, Pogson GH, Mol Ecol 2011 20 4968 4982 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05336.x 22060977
14. Speciation genes in free-spawning marine invertebrates. Lessios HA, Integr Comp Biol 2011 51 456 465 10.1093/icb/icr039 21700571
15. Speciation in sea urchins. Lessios H, Echinoderms: DurhamProceedings of the 12th International Echinoderm Conference, 7-11 August 2006, Durham, New Hampshire, USA London: CRC Press, Harris L, Böttger S, Walker C, Lesser M, 2009 91 101
16. Speciation and population genetic structure in tropical pacific sea urchins. Palumbi S, Grabowsky G, Duda T, Geyer L, Tachino N, Evolution 1997 51 1506 1517 10.2307/2411203
17. Phylogeography and bindin evolution in Arbacia, a sea urchin genus with an unusual distribution. Lessios HA, Lockhart S, Collin R, Sotil G, Sanchez-Jerez P, Zigler KS, Perez AF, Garrido MJ, Geyer LB, Bernardi G, et al. Mol Ecol 2012 21 130 144 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05303.x 21981354
18. Widespread mass mortalities of the green sea urchin in Nova Scotia, Canada. Miller RJ, Colodey AG, Mar Biol 1983 73 263 267 10.1007/BF00392252
19. Large-scale spatial distribution patterns of echinoderms in nearshore rocky habitats. Iken K, Konar B, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Cruz-Motta JJ, Knowlton A, Pohle G, Mead A, Miloslavich P, Wong M, Trott T, et al. PLoS One 2010 5 13845 10.1371/journal.pone.0013845 21079760
20. Of sea urchins and worms: development and cancer. Knudson AG, Cell Death Differ 2004 11 11 12 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401295 14685167
21. Disease in Sea Urchins. Tajima K, Silva J, Lawrence J, Edible Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology Oxford, UK: Elsevier., Lawrence J, 2007 167 182 Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science
22. A basal deuterostome genome viewed as a natural experiment. Andrew Cameron R, Davidson EH, Gene 2007 406 1 7 10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.031 18022769
23. The S. purpuratus genome: a comparative perspective. Materna SC, Berney K, Cameron RA, Dev Biol 2006 300 485 495 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.033 17056028
24. Marine invertebrate genome sequences and our evolving understanding of animal immunity. Rast JP, Messier-Solek C, Biol Bull 2008 214 274 283 10.2307/25470669 18574104
25. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W, Nat Rev Genet 2005 6 893 904 10.1038/nrg1726 16341070
26. Lawrence JM, Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier 2 2007
27. The Genome of the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Davidson EH, Cameron RA, Gibbs RA, Angerer RC, Angerer LM, Arnone MI, Burgess DR, Burke RD, et al. Science 2006 314 941 952 17095691
28. World Echinoidea Database http://www.marinespecies.org/echinoidea/
29. Echinoderm phylogeny including Xyloplax, a progenetic asteroid. Janies DA, Voight JR, Daly M, Syst Biol 2011 60 420 438 10.1093/sysbio/syr044 21525529
30. A combined morphological and molecular phylogeny for sea urchins (Echinoidea: Echinodermata). Littlewood DT, Smith AB, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1995 347 213 234 10.1098/rstb.1995.0023 7746863
31. Mitochondrial genome evolution in Ophiuroidea, Echinoidea, and Holothuroidea: insights in phylogenetic relationships of Echinodermata. Perseke M, Bernhard D, Fritzsch G, Brümmer F, Stadler PF, Schlegel M, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2010 56 201 211 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.035 20152912
32. The sea urchin genus Strongylocentrotus in the seas of Russia: taxonomy and ranges. Bazhin A, Echinoderms(Proceedings of the 9th International Echinoderm Conference) San Francisco: Balkema, Mooi R, Telford M, 1996 536 566
33. Affiliation of sea urchin, Pseudocentrotus depressus, to the family Strongylocentrotidae and description of Mesocentrotus new genus belonging to this group based on DNA-DNA hybridization and comparative morphological data. Tatarenko D, Poltaraus A, Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 1993 67 61 72
34. Phylogeny and development of marine model species: strongylocentrotid sea urchins. Biermann CH, Kessing BD, Palumbi SR, Evol Dev 2003 5 360 371 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03043.x 12823452
35. Molecular phylogenies and divergence times of sea urchin species of Strongylocentrotidae, Echinoida. Lee YH, Mol Biol Evol 2003 20 1211 1221 10.1093/molbev/msg125 12777524
36. The molecular evolution of sperm bindin in six species of sea urchins (Echinoida: Strongylocentrotidae). Biermann CH, Mol Biol Evol 1998 15 1761 1771 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025902 9866210
37. Multiple gene genealogies reveal asymmetrical hybridization and introgression among strongylocentrotid sea urchins. Addison JA, Pogson GH, Mol Ecol 2009 18 1239 1251 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04094.x 19222750
38. Reproductive isolation between species of sea urchins. Lessios HA, Bull Mar Sci 2007 81 191 208
39. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Palumbi SR, Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999 96 12632 12637 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12632 10535974
40. Sea urchin bindin divergence predicts gamete compatibility. Zigler KS, McCartney MA, Levitan DR, Lessios HA, Evolution 2005 59 2399 2404 16396180
41. Genealogy of neutral genes in two partially isolated populations. Takahata N, Slatkin M, Theor Popul Biol 1990 38 331 350 10.1016/0040-5809(90) 90018-Q 2293402
42. Gene trees in species trees. Maddison WP, Syst Biol 1997 46 523 536 10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523
43. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Maddison WP, Knowles LL, Syst Biol 2006 55 21 30 10.1080/10635150500354928 16507521
44. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Avise J, Ball R, Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology Oxford, U.K: Oxford Univ. Press, Futuyma D, Antonovics J, 1990 45 67
45. Phylogenetics and the origin of species. Avise JC, Wollenberg K, Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997 94 7748 7755 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7748 9223259
46. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Rannala B, Yang Z, Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2008 9 217 231 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164407
47. The UCSC genome browser database: 2008 update. Karolchik D, Kuhn RM, Baertsch R, Barber GP, Clawson H, Diekhans M, Giardine B, Harte RA, Hinrichs AS, Hsu F, et al. Nulceic Acids Res 2008 36 773 D779
48. SpBase: the sea urchin genome database and web site. Cameron RA, Samanta M, Yuan A, He D, Davidson E, Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 750 D754 10.1093/nar/gkn887 19010966
49. Evolution of mitochondrial gene orders in echinoderms. Perseke M, Fritzsch G, Ramsch K, Bernt M, Merkle D, Middendorf M, Bernhard D, Stadler PF, Schlegel M, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2008 47 855 864 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.034 18280182
50. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Pamilo P, Nei M, Mol Biol Evol 1988 5 568 583 3193878
51. On the phylogenetic relationships of hadromerid and poecilosclerid sponges. Kober KM, Nichols SA, J Mar Biol Assoc U K 2007 87 1585 1598
52. Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria. Telford MJ, Wise MJ, Gowri-Shankar V, Mol Biol Evol 2005 22 1129 1136 10.1093/molbev/msi099 15689526
53. Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches-case studies with diploblast LSU. Erpenbeck D, Nichols SA, Voigt O, Dohrmann M, Degnan BM, Hooper JN, Worheide G, J Mol Evol 2007 64 5 543 57 Epub 2007 Apr 24 10.1007/s00239-006-0146-3 17460808
54. Statistics and truth in phylogenomics. Kumar S, Filipski AJ, Battistuzzi FU, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Tamura K, Mol Biol Evol 2011 39 457 472
55. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Yang Z, Rannala B, Nat Rev Genet 2012 13 303 314 10.1038/nrg3186 22456349
56. When phylogenetic assumptions are violated: base compositional heterogeneity and among-site rate variation in beetle mitochondrial phylogenomics. Song H, Sheffield NC, Cameron SL, Miller KB, Whiting MF, Syst Entomol 2010 35 429 448 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00517.x
57. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Boore JL, Nucleic Acids Res 1999 27 1767 1780 10.1093/nar/27.8.1767 10101183
58. Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: What mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Shaw KL, Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002 99 16122 16127 10.1073/pnas.242585899 12451181
59. The Ultrastructure of Spines in Sea Urchins of the Family Strongylocentrotidae. Vinnikova V, Drozdov A, Biol Bull 2011 38 861 867 10.1134/S1062359011090093
60. Marine speciation on a small planet. Palumbi SR, Trends Ecol Evol 1992 7 114 118 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90144-Z 21235975
61. Speciation on the coasts of the new world: phylogeography and the evolution of bindin in the sea urchin genus Lytechinus. Zigler KS, Lessios HA, Evolution 2004 58 1225 1241 15266972
62. Vicariance and dispersal across Baja California in disjunct marine fish populations. Bernardi G, Findley L, Rocha-Olivares A, Evolution 2003 57 1599 1609 12940364
63. The bering strait connection: dispersal and speciation in boreal macroalgae. Lindstrom SC, J Biogeogr 2001 28 243 251 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001. 00529.x
64. Chronology of fluctuating Sea levels since the triassic. Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR, Science 1987 235 1156 1167 10.1126/science.235.4793.1156 17818978
65. Geographical restriction as a guide to the causes of extinction: the case of the cold northern oceans during the neogene. Vermeij GJ, Paleobiology 1989 15 335 356
66. The Strongylocentrotidae (Echinoidea), a morphological and systematic study. Jensen M, Sarsia 1974 57 113 148
67. Cenozoic migrations of marine invertebrates through the Bearing Strait region. Durham J, MacNeil F, The Bering Land Bridge Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, Hopkins D, 1967 326 349
68. Phylogenetic relationship, divergence times, and rates of molecular evolution for camarodont Sea urchins. Smith A, Mol Biol Evol 1988 5 345 365
69. A refined age for the earliest opening of Bering Strait. Gladenkov AY, Oleinik AE, Marincovich L Jr, Barinov KB, Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2002 183 321 328 10.1016/S0031-0182(02)00249-3
70. Distribution patterns of strongylocentrotus Sea urchins along the coast of eastern kamchatka. Bazhin AG, Russ J Mar Biol 2002 28 298 307 10.1023/A:1020951316734
71. Evolutionary animation: How do molecular phylogenies compare to Mayr's reconstruction of speciation patterns in the sea? Palumbi SR, Lessios HA, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 6566 6572 10.1073/pnas.0501806102 15851681
72. The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. Kroh A, Smith AB, J Syst Palaeontol 2010 8 147 212 10.1080/14772011003603556
73. SSAHA: a fast search method for large DNA databases. Ning Z, Cox AJ, Mullikin JC, Genome Res 2001 11 1725 1729 10.1101/gr.194201 11591649
74. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Zerbino DR, Birney E, Genome Res 2008 18 821 829 10.1101/gr.074492.107 18349386
75. Using the Velvet de novo assembler for short-read sequencing technologies. Zerbino DR, Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2010 11 11 15
76. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Huang X, Madan A, Genome Res 1999 9 868 877 10.1101/gr.9.9.868 10508846
77. BLAT - The BLAST-Like Alignment Tool. Kent WJ, Genome Res 2002 12 656 664 11932250
78. transAlign: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences. Bininda-Emonds OR, BMC Bioinforma 2005 6 156 10.1186/1471-2105-6-156
79. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. Bioinformatics 2007 23 2947 2948 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 17846036
80. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their Use in phylogenetic analysis. Castresana J, Mol Biol Evol 2000 17 540 552 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 10742046
81. The human genome browser at UCSC. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, Haussler D, Genome Res 2002 12 996 1006 12045153
82. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Ihaka R, Gentleman R, J Comput Graph Stat 1996 5 299 314
83. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Quinlan AR, Hall IM, Bioinformatics 2010 26 841 842 10.1093/bioinformatics/ btq033 20110278
84. EMBOSS: the european molecular biology open software suite. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A, Trends Genet 2000 16 276 277 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 10827456
85. The Newick utilities: high-throughput phylogenetic tree processing in the Unix shell. Junier T, Zdobnov EM, Bioinformatics 2010 26 1669 1670 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq243 20472542
86. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Yang Z, Mol Biol Evol 2007 24 1586 1591 10.1093/molbev/msm088 17483113
87. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O, Syst Biol 2010 59 307 321 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 20525638
88. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Yang Z, Trends Ecol Evol 1996 11 367 372 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10041-0 21237881
89. On the correlation between composition and site-specific evolutionary rate: implications for phylogenetic inference. Gowri-Shankar V, Rattray M, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 352 364 16237207
90. Automatic detection of conserved base pairing patterns in RNA virus genomes. Hofacker IL, Stadler PF, Comput Chem 1999 23 401 414 10.1016/S0097-8485(99)00013-3 10404627
91. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Tavare S, Lectures Math Life Sci 1986 17 57 86
92. High apparent rate of simultaneous compensatory base-pair substitutions in ribosomal RNA. Tillier ERM, Collins RA, Genetics 1998 148 1993 2002 9560412
93. RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods. Savill NJ, Hoyle DC, Higgs PG, Genetics 2001 157 399 411 11139520
94. RNA-based phylogenetic methods: application to mammalian mitochondrial RNA sequences. Hudelot C, Gowri-Shankar V, Jow H, Rattray M, Higgs PG, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003 28 241 252 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00061-7 12878461
95. Swofford DL, PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods) 4.0 Beta Sunderland, MA: Sinauer 2002
96. MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP, Syst Biol 2012 61 539 542 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 22357727
97. Multiple comparisons of Log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M, Mol Biol Evol 1999 16 1114 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201
98. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M, J Mol Evol 1990 31 151 160 10.1007/BF02109483
99. Bayes factors. Kass RE, Raftery AE, J Am Stat Assoc 1995 90 773 795 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
100. Testing the molecular clock: molecular and paleontological estimates of divergence times in the echinoidea (Echinodermata). Smith AB, Pisani D, Mackenzie-Dodds JA, Stockley B, Webster BL, Littlewood DTJ, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 1832 1851 10.1093/molbev/msl039 16777927