Measuring scaffolding in teacher - small-group interactions

Pedagogy: New Developments in the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 151-188

  Pol, Janneke van de ^a   Volman, Monique ^a   Elbers, Ed ^b   Beishuizen, Jos ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contingency; Group work; Measurement instrument; Scaffolding; Teacher student interaction; Zone of proximal development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876708198     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional science, 33, 381-412. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
2. Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 365-399.
3. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
4. De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-68. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00052
5. Elbers, E., Hajer, M., Jonkers, M., Koole, T., & Prenger, J. (2008). Instructional dialogues: Participation in dyadic interactions in multicultural classrooms. In J. Deen, M. Hajer, & T. Koole (Eds.), Interaction in two multicultural mathematics classrooms: Mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 141-172). Amsterdam: Aksant.
6. Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271-287.
7. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-240.
8. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research. 30, 411-433.
9. Koole, T. (2010). Displays of epistemic access. Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 183-209. doi: 10.1080/08351811003737846
10. Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.
11. Lockhorst, D., Wubbels, T., & Van Oers, B. (2010). Educational dialogues and the fostering of pupils' independence: the practices of two teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 99-121. doi: 10.1080/00220270903079237
12. Mattanah, J. F., Pratt, M. W., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Authoritative parenting, parental scaffolding of long-division mathematics, and children's academic competence in fourth grade. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 85-106. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.10.007
13. Maybin, J., Mercer, N., Stierer, B., & Norman, K. (1992). 'Scaffolding' learning in the classroom Thinking voices: The work of the national oracy project (pp. 186-195). London: Hodder & Stroughton.
14. Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1992). How do teachers help children to learn? An analysis of teachers' interventions in computer-based activities. Learning and Instruction, 2, 339-355.
15. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. A sociocultural approach. New York: Routledge.
16. Nathan, M., & Kim, S. (2009). Regulation of teacher elicitations in the mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 91-120. doi: 10.1080/07370000902797304
17. O'Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 781-802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Oh, P. S. (2005). Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students presenting their science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1825-1851.
19. Pino-Pasternak, D., Whitebread, D., & Tolmie, A. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of parent-child interactions during academic tasks and their relationships with children's self-regulated learning. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 219-272. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2010.490494
20. Pratt, M. W., Green, D., MacVicar, J., & Bountrogianni, M. (1992). The mathematical parent: Parental scaffolding, parenting style, and learning outcomes in long-division mathematics homework. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 17-34.
21. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 57-84.
22. Stone, C. A. (1998a). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
23. Stone, C. A. (1998b). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 409-413.
24. Strijbos, J., Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction, 17, 394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.005
25. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 305-335.
26. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-279. doi 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
27. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 46-57. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004
28. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (submitted). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective.
29. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (in preparation). The effect of teacher scaffolding on students? engagement and achievement: A Multilevel Model.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society - The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard University Press.
31. Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1-28.
32. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.
33. Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 131-147.