Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students presenting their science investigations

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 1825-1851

  Seok Oh, Phil ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144451621     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690500239714     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Burbules, N. C., & Bruce, B. C. (2001). Theory and research on teaching as dialogue. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1102–1121). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M., & Underwood-Greg, D. (1998). Individual construction, mathematical acculturation, and the classroom community. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 63–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 83–106). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
6. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
7. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: MacMillan.
8. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Methuen.
9. Floden, R. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10. Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 277–291). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Green, J. L., & Smith, D. (1983). Teaching and learning: A linguistic perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 353–391.
12. Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 401–430.
13. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 451–493.
14. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Shachar, H. (1990). Teachers’ verbal behavior in cooperative and wholeclass instruction. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 77–94). New York: Praeger.
15. Hodson, D., & Bencze, L. (1998). Becoming critical about practical work: Changing views and changing practice through action research. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 683–694.
16. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.
17. Kovalainen, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Vasama, S. (2001). Orchestrating classroom interaction in a community of inquiry: Modes of teacher participation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 17–28.
18. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). “Scaffolding” learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 186–195). London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
19. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York: Routledge.
21. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Mortimer, E. F., & Machado, A. H. (2000). Anomalies and conflicts in classroom discourse. Science Education, 84, 429–444.
23. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Oh, P. S., Shin, M.-K., & Yager, R. E. (2004). Student perceptions of peer assessment in an action research context. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(3), 129–141.
25. Oh, P. S., & Yager, R. E. (2004). Development of constructivist science classrooms and changes in student attitudes toward science learning. Science Education International, 15(2), 105–113.
26. Rogoff, B., & Toma, C. (1997). Shared thinking: Community and institutional variations. Discourse Processes, 23, 471–497.
27. Roth, K. J. (2002). Talking to understand science. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (pp. 197–262). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
28. Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W.-M. (1996). Interactions in an open-inquiry physics laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 423–445.
29. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
30. Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.
31. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1989). Group Investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 17–21.
32. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1994). Group Investigation in the cooperative classroom. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 97–114). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
33. Shin, M.-K., Yager, R. E., Oh, P. S., & Lee, M.-K. (2003). Changes in science classrooms after experiencing an international professional staff development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 505–522.
34. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.
35. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tobin, K. (1987). Forces which shape the implemented curriculum in high school science and mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 287–298.
37. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6), 549–560.
38. van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understanding in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. and Trans.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 144–188).
40. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe., Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(3), 233–269.
41. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wertsch, J. V. (1980). The significance of dialogue in Vygotsky’s account of social, egocentric, and inner speech. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 5, 150–162.
43. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, G. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–179). New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
45. Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.