Switch probability context (in)sensitivity within the cognitive control network

NeuroImage

Volumn 77, Issue , 2013, Pages 207-214

  De Baene, Wouter ^a,b   Brass, Marcel ^a,b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Contextual effects; Switch probability; Task preparation; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876699781     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.057     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Badre D., Wagner A.D. Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:7186-7191.
2. Bonnin C.A., Gaonac'h D., Bouquet C.A. Adjustments of task-set control processes: effect of task switch frequency on task-mixing and task-switching costs. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2011, 23:985-997.
3. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12:908-914.
4. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. Decomposing components of task preparation with functional MRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:609-620.
5. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. Selection for cognitive control: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:8847-8852.
6. Braver T.S., Reynolds J.R., Donaldson D.I. Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron 2003, 39:713-726.
7. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task switching. Cogn. Psychol. 2007, 55:37-85.
8. Cole M.W., Schneider W. The cognitive control network: integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. Neuroimage 2007, 37:343-360.
9. De Baene W., Brass M. Cue-switch effects do not rely on the same neural systems as task-switch effects. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2011, 11:600-607.
10. De Baene W., Kühn S., Brass M. Challenging a decade of brain research on task switching: brain activation in the task-switching paradigm reflects adaptation rather than reconfiguration of task sets. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33:639-651.
11. de Jong R. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. Attention and Performance XVIII 2000, 357-376. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
12. Dreisbach G., Haider H. Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13:334-338.
13. Duthoo W., De Baene W., Wühr P., Notebaert W. When predictions take control: the effect of task predictions on task switching performance. Front. Cogn. 2012, 3:282. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00282.
14. Gruber O., Karch S., Schlueter E.K., Falkai P., Goschke T. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching. Neuroimage 2006, 31:887-895.
15. Hyafil A., Summerfield C., Koechlin E. Two mechanisms for task switching in the prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:5135-5142.
16. Jost K., Mayr U., Rösler F. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2008, 8:74-87.
17. Jost K., De Baene W., Koch I., Brass M. A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Z. Psychol. 2013, 221:5-14.
18. Karayanidis F., Mansfield E.L., Galloway K.L., Smith J., Provost A., Heathcote A. Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 9:202-215.
19. Karayanidis F., Provost A., Brown S., Paton B., Heathcote A. Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:559-568.
20. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Control and interference in task switching-a review. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136:849-874.
21. Kimberg D.Y., Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000, 10:189-196.
22. Lavric A., Mizon G., Monsell S. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1016-1029.
23. Luks T.L., Simpson G.V., Feiwell R.J., Miller W.L. Evidence for anterior cingulate cortex involvement in monitoring preparatory attentional set. Neuroimage 2002, 17:792-802.
24. MacDonald A.W., Cohen J.D., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 2000, 288:1835-1838.
25. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-selection costs. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2003, 29:362-372.
26. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1996, 22:1423-1442.
27. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cogn. Psychol. 2000, 41:211-253.
28. Monsell S., Mizon G.A. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:493-516.
29. Nieuwenhuis S., Monsell S. Residual costs in task switching: testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2002, 9:86-92.
30. Periáñez J.A., Maestú F., Barceló F., Fernández A., Amo C., Alonso T.O. Spatiotemporal brain dynamics during preparatory set shifting: MEG evidence. Neuroimage 2004, 21:687-695.
31. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
32. Ruge H., Brass M., Koch I., Rubin O., Meiran N., von Cramon D.Y. Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: further insights from BOLD fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:340-355.
33. Ruge H., Müller S.C., Braver T.S. Anticipating the consequences of action: an fMRI study of intention-based task preparation. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:1019-1027.
34. Ruge H., Jamadar S., Zimmermann U., Karayanidis F. The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 10.1002/hbm.21420.
35. Rushworth M.F., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:5262-5271.
36. Rushworth M.F., Hadland K., Paus T., Sipila P. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:2577-2592.
37. Shi Y., Zhou X., Müller H.J., Schubert T. The neural implementation of task rule activation in the task-cuing paradigm: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 51:1253-1264.
38. Slagter H.A., Weissman D.H., Giesbrecht B., Kenemans J.L., Mangun G.R., Kok A., Woldorff M.G. Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2006, 6:175-189.
39. Sohn M.H., Ursu S., Anderson J.R., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:13448-13453.
40. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136:601-626.
41. Vossel S., Weidner R., Fink G.R. Dynamic coding of events within the inferior frontal gyrus in a probabilistic selective attention task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:414-424.
42. Wylie G.R., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Jumping the gun: is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation of task-relevant neural circuitry?. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:394-404.
43. Yantis S. Neural basis of selective attention: cortical sources and targets of attentional modulation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 17:86-90.