Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 202-215

  Karayanidis, Frini ^a   Mansfield, Elise L ^a   Galloway, Kasey L ^a   Smith, Janette L ^a   Provost, Alexander ^a   Heathcote, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATIVE CUE; MALE; PREDICTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK SWITICHING; UNCERTAINTY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67649532645     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.202     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDREASSI, J. L. (2000). Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ARRINGTON, C. M., LOGAN, G. D., & SCHNEIDER, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 484-502. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484
3. COHEN, J. D., ROMERO, R. D., SERVAN-SCHREIBER, D., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Mechanisms of spatial attention: The relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 377-387. doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.4.377 (Pubitemid 24348528)
4. DRIESBACH, G., HAIDER, H., & KLUWE, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 468-483. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.468
5. FORSTMANN, B. U., DUTILH, G., BROWN, S., NEUMANN, J., VON CRAMON, D. Y., RIDDERINKHOF, K. R., & WAGENMAKERS, E.-J. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 17538-17542.
6. GRASMAN, R. P. P. P., WAGENMAKERS, E.-J., & VAN DER MAAS, H. L. J. (2009). On the mean and variance of response times under the diffusion model with an application to parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 55-68. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2009.01.006
7. HEATHCOTE, A., BROWN, S., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2002). Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 394-401.
8. HÜBNER, M., DREISBACH, G., HAIDER, H., & KLUWE, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 289-297. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.289 (Pubitemid 38413923)
9. ILLE, N., BERG, P., & SCHERG, M. (2002). Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 19, 113-124. (Pubitemid 34538845)
10. KARAYANIDIS, F., COLTHEART, M., MICHIE, P. T., & MURPHY, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and posttarget components of task-switching. Psychophysiology, 40, 329-348. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00037 (Pubitemid 36596903)
11. KIEFFABER, P. D., & HETRICK, W. P. (2005). Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology, 42, 56-71. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00262.x (Pubitemid 40395415)
12. KOCH, I., & PHILIPP, A. M. (2005). Effects of response selection on the task repetition benefit in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 33, 624-634. (Pubitemid 46211618)
13. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
15. MEIRAN, N., CHOREV, Z., & SAPIR, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0736
16. MINIUSSI, C., MARZI, C. A., & NOBRE, A. C. (2005). Modulation of brain activity by selective task sets observed using event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1514-1528. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.014 (Pubitemid 40884686)
17. NICHOLSON, R., KARAYANIDIS, F., BUMAK, E., POBOKA, D., & MICHIE, P. (2006). ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues. Brain Research, 1095, 107-123. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.016 (Pubitemid 43866016)
18. NICHOLSON, R., KARAYANIDIS, F., DAVIES, A., & MICHIE, P. T. (2006). Components of task set reconfiguration: Differential effects of "switch-to" and "switch-away" cues. Brain Research, 1121, 160-176. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.101
19. NICHOLSON, R., KARAYANIDIS, F., POBOKA, D., HEATHCOTE, A., & MICHIE, P. T. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology, 42, 540-554. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00350.x (Pubitemid 43942834)
20. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
21. RATCLIFF, R. (2008). The EZ diffusion method: Too EZ? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1218-1228.
22. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
23. RUSHWORTH, M. F., PASSINGHAM, R. E., & NOBRE, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52, 83-98. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83 (Pubitemid 40506619)
24. SCHUCH, S., & KOCH, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92-105. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92 (Pubitemid 38360916)
25. SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 35-50. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
26. VASEY, M., & THAYER, J. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479-486. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00324.x (Pubitemid 17114214)
27. WAGENMAKERS, E.-J., VAN DER MAAS, H. L. J., DOLAN, C. V., & GRASMAN, R. P. P. P. (2008). EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1229-1235.
28. WAGENMAKERS, E.-J., VAN DER MAAS, H. L. J., & GRASMAN, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3-22.
29. WYLIE, G. R., & ALLPORT, D. A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research, 63, 212-233. doi:10.1007/s004269900003