A comparison of the glidescope video laryngoscope to the c-mac video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Mosier, Jarrod ^a,b   Chiu, Stephen ^c   Patanwala, Asad E ^d   Sakles, John C ^a  

^a Department of Emergency Medicine ^*  (United States)

^b Department of Internal Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY WARD; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VIDEOENDOSCOPY;

EID: 84876683538     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: 10976760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aziz M, Brambrink A. The Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope: description of a new device, case report, and brief case series. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:149-152.
2. Benjamin FJ, Boon D, French RA. An evaluation of the GlideScope, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:517-521.
3. Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:611-613. (Pubitemid 37038481)
4. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, et al. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191-198. (Pubitemid 40467979)
5. Hirabayashi Y. Airway scope: initial clinical experience with novice personnel. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:160-161. (Pubitemid 46505522)
6. Sakles JC, Rodgers R, Keim SM. Optical and video laryngoscopes for emergency airway management. Intern Emerg Med. 2008;3: 139-143.
7. Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1090-1097.
8. Ayoub CM, Kanazi GE, Al Alami A, et al. Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope compared to direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:674-678.
9. Fonte M, Oulego-Erroz I, Nadkarni L, et al. A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:398-402.
10. Kaki AM, Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, et al. Use of Airtraq, C-Mac, and Glidescope laryngoscope is better than Macintosh in novice medical students' hands: a manikin study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:376-381.
11. McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, et al. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:483-489.
12. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:32-37.
13. Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, et al. Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios. Emerg Med J. 2008;25:279-282. (Pubitemid 351638486)
14. Lim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2005;60: 180-183. (Pubitemid 40220687)
15. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, et al. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723-730.
16. Malik MA, O'Donoghue C, Carney J, et al. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:128-134.
17. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761-768.
18. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, et al. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:34-41.
19. Byhahn C, Iber T, Zacharowski K, et al. Tracheal intubation using the mobile C-MAC video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010.
20. Cavus E, Thee C, Moeller T, et al. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2011;11:6
21. Choi GS, Lee EH, Lim CS, et al. A comparative study on the usefulness of the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;60:339-343.
22. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, et al. Glidescope(R) videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:41-52.
23. Maassen R, van Zundert A. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:955; author reply 955-956.
24. McElwain J, Laffey JG. Comparison of the C-MAC(R), Airtraq(R), and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:258-264.
25. Piepho T, Fortmueller K, Heid FM, et al. Performance of the CMAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1101-1105.
26. Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, et al. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16:866-871.
27. Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, et al. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope(R) video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:400-405.
28. Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, et al. Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1126-1132.
29. Xanthos T, Stroumpoulis K, Bassiakou E, et al. Glidescope((R)) videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: a randomized cross-over manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82: 464-467.
30. Xue FS, Yuan YJ, Liao X, et al. Is Glidescope(R) videolaryngoscope more effective than Macintosh laryngoscope for emergent intubation during chest compression? Resuscitation. 2011;82:956; author reply 957-958.
31. Yuan YJ, Xue FS, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of the tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope and GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope by advanced cardiac life support providers in a manikin study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77:558-559; author reply 560-561.
32. Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, et al. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med. 2012;42:629-634.
33. Bair AE, Caravelli R, Tyler K, et al. Feasibility of the preoperative Mallampati airway assessment in emergency department patients. J Emerg Med. 2010;38:677-680.
34. Levitan RM, Everett WW, Ochroch EA. Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:307-313. (Pubitemid 39237626)
35. Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, et al. A Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012.
36. Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, et al. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope((R)) video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2011.
37. Sakles J, Chiu S, Mosier J, et al. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. doi:10:1111/acem.12055.
38. Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012.
39. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004;99):607-613; table of contents. (Pubitemid 38970445)
40. Sakles JC, Kalin L. The effect of stylet choice on the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:235-238.
41. Lim Y, Yeo SW. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:243-247. (Pubitemid 40521027)
42. Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, et al. Comparison of the Glidescope, the McGrath, the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63:1358-1364.