Glidescope® videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: A randomized cross-over manikin study

Resuscitation

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 464-467

  Xanthos, Theodoros ^a   Stroumpoulis, Konstantinos ^a   Bassiakou, Eleni ^a   Koudouna, Eleni ^a   Pantazopoulos, Ioannis ^a   Mazarakis, Antonios ^a   Demestiha, Theano ^a   Iacovidou, Nicoletta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Glidescope ; Intubation time; Macintosh; Manikin; Success rate

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPRESSION THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; LARYNGOSCOPES; MANIKINS; PRESSURE; THORAX; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 79952629483     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berg R.A., Hilwig R.W., Kern K.B., Sanders A.B., Xavier L.C., Ewy G.A. Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillation: lethal delays of chest compressions before and after countershocks. Ann Emerg Med 2003, 42:458-467.
2. Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Ewy G.A. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002, 105:645-649.
3. Deakin C.D., Nolan J.P., Soar J., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1305-1352.
4. Gatward J.J., Thomas M.J.C., Nolan J.P., Cook T.M. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth 2008, 100:351-356.
5. Gerbeaux P. Should emergency medical service rescuers be trained to practice endotracheal intubation?. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:1864-1865.
6. Mulcaster J.T., Mills J., Hung O.R., et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003, 98:23-27.
7. Cooper R.M., Pacey J.A., Bishop M.J., McCluskey S.A. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (Glidescope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005, 52:191-198.
8. Xue F.S., Zhang G.H., Liu J., et al. The clinical assessment of Glidescope in orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2007, 73:451-457.
9. Benjamin F.J., Boon D., French R.A. An evaluation of the Glidescope, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006, 23:517-521.
10. Turkstra T.P., Harle C.C., Armstrong K.P., et al. The Glidescope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for Glidescope use. Can J Anaesth 2007, 54:891-896.
11. Stroumpoulis K., Pagoulatou A., Violari M., et al. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009, 26:218-222.
12. Jones J.H., Murphy M.P., Dickson R.L., Somerville G.G., Brizendine E.J. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med 2004, 11:707-709.
13. Katz S.H., Falk J.L. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2001, 37:32-37.
14. ® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. BMC Emerg Med 2009, 9:2.
15. Rai M.R., Dering A., Verghese C. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 2005, 60:60-64.
16. Lim T.J., Lim Y., Liu E.H.C. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005, 60:180-183.
17. Malik M.A., Maharaj C.H., Harte B.H., Laffey J.G. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:723-730.
18. Sun D.A., Warriner C.B., Parsons D.G., Klein R., Umedaly H.S., Moult M. The Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005, 94:381-384.
19. Nouruzi-Sedeh P., Schumann M., Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus Glidescope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:32-37.
20. Konrad C., Schüpfer G., Wietlisbach M., Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures?. Anesth Analg 1998, 86:635-639.
21. Han S.K., Shin D.H., Choi P.C. Utility of the Pentax-AWS without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model. Resuscitation 2010, 81:69-73.
22. Castle N., Owen R., Hann M., Naidoo R., Reeves D. Assessment of the speed and ease of insertion of three supraglottic airway devices by paramedics: a manikin study. Emerg Med J 2010, 27:860-863.
23. Uppal V., Gangaiah S., Fletcher G., Kinsella J. Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:882-885.
24. Schmid M., Mang H., Ey K., Schüttler J. Prehospital airway management on rescue helicopters in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 2009, 64:625-631.
25. Agrò F.E., Cataldo R., Mattei A. New devices and techniques for airway management. Minerva Anestesiol 2009, 75:141-149.
26. Rumball C.J., MacDonald D., The P.T.L. Combitube, laryngeal mask, and oral airway: a randomized prehospital comparative study of ventilatory device effectiveness and costeffectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997, 1:1-10.
27. Verghese C., Prior-Willeard P.F., Baskett P.J. Immediate management of the airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a hospital without a resident anaesthesiologist. Eur J Emerg Med 1994, 1:123-125.
28. Tanigawa K., Shigematsu A. Choice of airway devices for 12,020 cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in Japan. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998, 2:96-100.
29. The use of the laryngeal mask airway by nurses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: results of a multicentre trial. Anaesthesia 1994, 49:3-7.
30. Grantham H., Phillips G., Gilligan J.E. The laryngeal mask in prehospital emergency care. Emerg Med 1994, 6:193-197.
31. Kokkinis K. The use of the laryngeal mask airway in CPR. Resuscitation 1994, 27:9-12.
32. Leach A., Alexander C.A., Stone B. The laryngeal mask in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a district general hospital: a preliminary communication. Resuscitation 1993, 25:245-248.
33. Staudinger T., Brugger S., Watschinger B., et al. Emergency intubation with the Combitube: comparison with the endotracheal airway. Ann Emerg Med 1993, 22:1573-1575.
34. Jordan G.M., Silsby J., Bayley G., Cook T.M., Difficult Airway S Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:708-712.