Impact of glove occlusion on cumulative skin irritation with or without hand cleanser-comparison in an experimental repeated irritation model

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 293-299

  Antonov, Dimitar ^a   Kleesz, Peter ^b   Elsner, Peter ^a   Schliemann, Sibylle ^a  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b Berufsgenossenschaft Nahrungsmittel und Gastgewerbe (BGN)   (Germany)

Author keywords

detergents; irritant contact dermatitis; non invasive measuring methods; occupational; skin barrier

Indexed keywords

DISINFECTANT AGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; SKIN CREAM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREAM; ERYTHEMA; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GLOVE; HAND WASHING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOTION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERMEABILITY BARRIER; PH; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SKIN WATER LOSS;

ADULT; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; FEMALE; GLOVES, PROTECTIVE; HAND DERMATOSES; HAND DISINFECTION; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SKIN; SKIN CREAM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876672810     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12028     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Flyvholm M A, Lindberg M., OEESC-2005 -summing up on the theme irritants and wet work. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 55: 317-321.
2. Kutting B, Drexler H., The three-step programme of skin protection. A useful instrument of primary prevention or more effective in secondary prevention? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2008: 133: 201-205.
3. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius C R, Schmidt A, Diepgen T L., Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 453-462.
4. Bauer A, Kelterer D, Stadeler M, Schneider W, Kleesz P, Wollina U, Elsner P., The prevention of occupational hand dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and employees in the catering trades. Preliminary results of a skin prevention program. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 85-88.
5. Tacke J, Schmidt A, Fartasch M, Diepgen T L., Occupational contact dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and cooks. A population-based study. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 112-117.
6. Schliemann-Willers S, Fuchs S, Kleesz P, Grieshaber R, Elsner P., Fruit acids do not enhance sodium lauryl sulphate-induced cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol 2005: 85: 206-210.
7. Ramsing D W, Agner T., Effect of glove occlusion on human skin (II). Long-term experimental exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 258-262.
8. Berndt U, Gabard B, Schliemann-Willers S, Wigger-Alberti W, Zitterbart D, Elsner P., Integrated skin protection from workplace irritants: a new model for efficacy assessment. Exogenous Dermatol 2002: 1: 45-48.
9. Fartasch M, Diepgen T L, Drexler H, Elsner P, Fluhr J W, John S M, Kresken J, Wigger-Alberti W., Berufliche Hautmittel. AWMF-Leitlinie Nr. 013/056, 2008.
10. Schnetz E, Diepgen T L, Elsner P et al., Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 336-343.
11. Malten K E., Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 238-247.
12. Frosch P J, Kurte A., Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 161-168.
13. Wigger-Alberti W, Spoo J, Schliemann-Willers S, Klotz A, Elsner P., The tandem repeated irritation test: a new method to assess prevention of irritant combination damage to the skin. Acta Derm Venereol 2002: 82: 94-97.
14. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P., Petrolatum prevents irritation in a human cumulative exposure model in vivo. Dermatology 1997: 194: 247-250.
15. COLIPA. International sun protection factor (SPF) test method, 2006.
16. Tupker R A, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee C H, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J., Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 53-69.
17. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J., Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
18. Rogiers V., EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001: 14: 117-128.
19. Berardesca E, European Group for Efficacy Measurements on Cosmetics and Other Topical Products. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997: 3: 126-132.
20. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm K P, Takiwaki H, Serup J., Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 1-10.
21. Parra J L, Paye M., EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin surface pH. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2003: 16: 188-202.
22. Frosch P J, Kligman A M., The soap chamber test: a new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 35-41.
23. Holm S., A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979: 6: 65-70.
24. Ramsing D W, Agner T., Effect of glove occlusion on human skin. (I). Short-term experimental exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 1-5.
25. Van Der Valk P G, Maibach H I., Post-application occlusion substantially increases the irritant response of the skin to repeated short-term sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 335-338.
26. Wigger-Alberti W, Krebs A, Elsner P., Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application. Br J Dermatol 2000: 143: 551-556.
27. Kartono F, Maibach H I., Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 54: 303-312.
28. Jungersted J M, Hogh J K, Hellgren L I, Jemec G B, Agner T., Skin barrier response to occlusion of healthy and irritated skin: differences in trans-epidermal water loss, erythema and stratum corneum lipids. Contact Dermatitis 2010: 63: 313-319.
29. Wulfhorst B, Schwanitz H J, Bock M., Optimizing skin protection with semipermeable gloves. Dermatitis 2004: 15: 184-191.
30. Wetzky U, Bock M, Wulfhorst B, John S M., Short- and long-term effects of single and repetitive glove occlusion on the epidermal barrier. Arch Dermatol Res 2009: 301: 595-602.
31. Howes D., Percutaneous absorption of some anionic surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1975: 26: 47-63.
32. De Jongh C M, Jakasa I, Verberk M M, Kezic S., Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate. Br J Dermatol 2006: 154: 651-657.
33. Loden M, Buraczewska I, Edlund F., The irritation potential and reservoir effect of mild soaps. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 91-96.
34. Wigger-Alberti W, Rougier A, Richard A, Elsner P., Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test. Methodological aspects. Acta Derm Venereol 1998: 78: 270-273.
35. Winker R, Salameh B, Stolkovich S, Nikl M, Barth A, Ponocny E, Drexler H, Tappeiner G., Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009: 82: 653-662.
36. Kutting B, Baumeister T, Weistenhofer W, Pfahlberg A, Uter W, Drexler H., Effectiveness of skin protection measures in prevention of occupational hand eczema: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial over a follow-up period of 1 year. Br J Dermatol 2010: 162: 362-370.
37. Friebe K, Effendy I, Loffler H., Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate. Br J Dermatol 2003: 148: 65-69.
38. Agner T, Serup J., Time course of occlusive effects on skin evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Including patch tests with sodium lauryl sulphate and water. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 6-9.