Phylogenetics, morphological evolution, and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Euphorbia

Taxon

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 291-315

  Dorsey, Brian L ^a,f   Haevermans, Thomas ^b   Aubriot, Xavier ^b   Morawetz, Jeffery J ^c   Riina, Ricarda ^d   Steinmann, Victor W ^e   Berry, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Sorbonne Universités   (France)

^c RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^d CSIC   (Spain)

^e Avenida Lázaro Cárdenas 253   (Mexico)

^f Huntington Botanical Gardens   (United States)

Author keywords

Euphorbia subg. Euphorbia; Euphorbiaceae; Growth forms; ITS; Madagascar; matK; ndhF; New world; Sectional classification

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GROWTH FORM; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

MADAGASCAR;

EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE;

EID: 84876559074     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12705/622.1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aubriot, X. 2012. Radiations évolutives, "innovations clés" et notions d'espèces dans le genre Euphorbia L. à Madagascar. Ph.D. Dissertation, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
2. Bally, P.R.O. 1967. Miscellaneous notes on the flora of Tropical East Africa including description of new taxa, 35-37. Candollea 22: 255-263.
3. Barres, L., Vilatersana, R., Molero, J., Susanna, A. & Galbany-Casals, M. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of Euphorbia subg. Esula sect. Aphyllis (Euphorbiaceae) inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA markers with biogeographic insights. Taxon 60: 705-720.
4. Bernal, R., Mora, F. & Murillo, J. 2006. Euphorbia sinclairiana, an older name for the widespread Euphorbia elata. Caldasia 28: 217-220.
5. Boissier, E. 1862. Euphorbieae. Pp. 3-188 in: Candolle, A.P. de (ed.), Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 15(2). Paris: Victor Mason and Fils.
6. Bridges, E.L. & Orzell, S.L. 2002. Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) section Tithymalus subsection Inundatae in the southeastern United States. Lundellia 5: 59-78.
7. Bruyns, P.V., Mapaya, R.J. & Hedderson, T. 2006. A new subgeneric classification for Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in southern Africa based on ITS and psbA-trnH sequence data. Taxon 55: 397-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065587
8. Bruyns, P.V., Klak, C. & Hanacek, P. 2011. Age and diversity in Old World succulent species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 60: 1717-1733.
9. Cacho, N.I., Berry, P.E., Olson, M.E., Steinmann, V.W. & Baum, D.A. 2010. Are spurred cyathia a key innovation? Molecular systematics and trait evolution in the slipper spurges (Pedilanthus clade: Euphorbia, Euphorbiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 97: 493-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900090
10. Carter, S. 1994. A preliminary classification of Euphorbia subgenus Euphorbia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 368-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2992103
11. Dressler, R.L. 1957. The genus Pedilanthus. Contr. Gray Herb. 182: 1-188.
12. Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 32: 1792-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
13. Edwards, E.J. & Donoghue, M.J. 2006. Pereskia and the origin of the cactus life-form. Amer. Naturalist 167: 777-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/504605
14. Eggli, U. 1994. Xerophytic euphorbias from Brazil. Euphorbia J. 9: 11-23.
15. Forster, P.I. 1994. Revision of Euphorbia plumerioides Tejsm. ex Hassk. (Euphorbiaceae) and allies. Austrobaileya 4: 245-264.
16. Gilbert, M.G. 1987. Two new geophytic species of Euphorbia with comments on the subgeneric groupings of its African members. Kew Bull. 42: 231-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4109908
17. Gilbert, M.G. 1995. Euphorbiaceae. Pp. 265-380 in: Edwards, S., Mesfin Tadesse & Hedberg, I. (eds.), Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Uppsala: Uppsala University; Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
18. Haevermans, T. 2003. Le genre Euphorbia à Madagascar: Phylogénie moléculaire et systématique. Ph.D. Dissertation, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
19. Haevermans, T. & Labat, J.-N.l. 2004. A synoptic revision of the Malagasy endemic Euphorbia pervilleana group. Syst. Bot. 29: 118-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364404772974266
20. Haevermans, T., Hoffmann, P., Lowry, P.P., Labat, J.N. & Randrianjohany, E. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of the Madagascan Euphorbia subgenus Lacanthis based on ITS sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 91: 247-259.
21. Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 41: 95-98.
22. Hassall, D.C. 1977. The genus Euphorbia in Australia. Austral. J. Bot. 25: 429-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT9770429
23. Horn, J.W., Van Ee, B.W. & Wurdack, K.J. 2011. The giant genus Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae): Deep phylogenetics and major evoltionary patterns. Symposium talk, International Botanical Confeence, Melbourne, Australia.
24. Horn, J.W., Van Ee, B.W., Morawetz, J.J., Riina, R., Steinmann, V.W., Berry, P.E. & Wurdack, K.J. 2012. Phylogenetics and the evolution of major structural characters in the giant genus Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 63: 305-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.022
25. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
26. Lemmon, A.R.J.M.B., Stanger-Hall, K. & Lemmon, E.M. 2009. The effect of missing data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst. Biol. 58: 130-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp017
27. Marshall, D.C. 2010. Cryptic failure of partitioned Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: Lost in the land of long trees. Syst. Biol. 59: 108-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp080
28. Marshall, D.C., Simon, C. & Buckley, T.R. 2006. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst. Biol. 55: 993-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150601087641
29. Müller, K. 2005. The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support. B. M. C Evol. Biol. 5: 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-5-58
30. Müller, K. 2006. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 38: 667-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.011
31. Nobel, P.S. 1988. Environmental biology of agaves and cacti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Olmstead, R.G. & Sweere, J.A. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/43.4.467
33. Park, K.R. & Jansen, R.K. 2007. A phylogeny of Euphorbieae subtribe Euphorbiinae (Euphorbiaceae) based on molecular data. J. Pl. Biol. 50: 644-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03030608
34. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
35. Prenner, G. & Rudall, P.J. 2007. Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: Exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1612-1629. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.10.1612
36. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. 2007. Tracer, version 1.5. Insitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
37. Riina, R. & Berry, P.E. (coord.) 2012. Euphorbia planetary biodiversity inventory database. http://app.tolkin.org/projects/72/taxa
38. Rizzini, C.T. 1987. Cactiform species of Euphorbia from Brazil (Euphorbiaceae). Revista Brasil. Biol. 49: 979-997.
39. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
40. Samuel, R., Kathriarachchi, H., Hoffmann, P., Barfuss, M.H.J., Wurdack, K.J., Davis, C.C. & Chase, M.W. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthaceae: Evidence from plastid matK and nuclear phyC sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 132-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.132
41. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chlroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.142
42. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369
43. Staden, R. 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package. Molec. Biotechnol. 5: 233-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02900361
44. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
45. Steinmann, V.W. & Porter, J.M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on its and ndhF sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 89: 453-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3298591
46. Steinmann, V.W., Van Ee, B., Berry, P.E. & Gutierrez, J. 2007. The systematic position of Cubanthus and other shrubby endemic species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in Cuba. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 64: 123-133.
47. Urbatsch, L.E., Baldwin, B.G. & Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Syst. Bot. 25: 539-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666695
48. White, A.C., Dyer, R.A. & Sloan, B. 1941. The succulent Euphorbieae, 2 vols. Padasena: Abbey Gardens Press.
49. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J.W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-324 in: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J. (eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
50. Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L. & Swofford, D.L. 2004. AWTY: A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. School of Computation Sciences, Florida State University. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty
51. Yang, Y., Riina, R., Morawetz, J.J., Haevermans, T., Aubriot, X. & Berry, P.E. 2012. Molecular phylogenetics and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 61: 764-789.
52. Zimmermann, N.F.A., Ritz, C.M. & Hellwig, F.H. 2010. Further support for the phylogenetic relationships within Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) from nrITS and trnL-trnF IGS sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 286: 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0272-7