Phylogeny of Hedyotis L. (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae): Redefining a complex Asian-Pacific assemblage

Taxon

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 357-374

  Wikström, Niklas ^a   Neupane, Suman ^b   Kårehed, Jesper ^c   Motley, Timothy J ^b   Bremer, Birgitta ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Asia; Hedyotis; Phylogenetic analysis; Rubiaceae; Spermacoceae

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

ASIA; PACIFIC OCEAN;

EXALLAGE; HEDYOTIS; HEDYOTIS FRUTICOSA; RUBIACEAE; SPERMACOCE HISPIDA; SPERMACOCEAE;

EID: 84876555475     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12705/622.2     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alfaro, M.E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 255-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028
2. Andersson, L. & Rova, J.H.E. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 161-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985737
3. Babu, C.R. 1969. Thecagonum Babu-a new generic name in Rubiaceae. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 11: 213-214.
4. Baldwin, B.G. & Markos, S. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 10: 449-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0545
5. Barrie, F.R. 2006. Report of the General Committee: 9. Taxon 55: 795-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065657
6. Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. 1873. Genera plantarum, vol. 2. London: Reeve.
7. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1939. Pleiocraterium genus novum Rubiacearum Hedyotidearum. Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 36: 438-445.
8. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schumann. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Sect. 2 48(2): 1-298.
9. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and subdivision of the Rubioideae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 1-33.
10. Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogenetic studies within Rubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 33-50.
11. Bremer, B. & Eriksson, T. 2009. Timetree of Rubiaceae: Phylogeny and dating the family, subfamilies and tribes. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 766-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/599077
12. Bremer, B. & Manen, J.F. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 225: 43-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985458
13. Candolle, A.P. de 1830. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 4. Paris: Masson.
14. Chamisso, A. & Schlechtendal, D. 1829. De plantis in expeditione speculatoria Romanzoffiana observatis. Rubiaceae. Linnaea 4: 129-202.
15. Chen, T. & Taylor, C.M. 2011. Hedyotis. Pp. 147-174 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. & Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 19. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
16. Dessein, S. 2003. Systematic studies in the Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae). Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
17. Dessein, S., Andersson, L., Geuten, K., Smets, E. & Robbrecht, E. 2005. Gomphocalyx and Phylohydrax (Rubiaceae): Sister taxa excluded from the Spermacoceae s.s., featuring a remarkable case of convergent evolution. Taxon 54: 91-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065305
18. Devi, H.M. & Raju, P.V.S.N.G.K. 1990. An embryological approach to the taxonomical status of Hedyotis Linn. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 100: 51-60.
19. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
20. Dutta, R. & Deb, D.B. 2004. Taxonomic revision of Hedyotis L. (Rubiaceae) in Indian subcontinent. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.
21. Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 32: 1792-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
22. Edgar, R.C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460-2461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
23. Fosberg, F.R. 1943. The Polynesian species of Hedyotis (Rubiaceae). Bull. Bernice P. Bishop Mus. 147: 1-102.
24. Fosberg, F.R. & Sachet, M.H. 1991. Studies in Indo-Pacific Rubiaceae. Allertonia 6: 191-278.
25. Fosberg, F.R., Sachet, M.H. & Oliver, R.L. 1993. Flora of Micronesia, vol. 5, Bignoniaceae-Rubiaceae. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 81. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
26. Fukuoka, N. 1969. Two new species of Hedyotis from Thailand. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 24: 28-31.
27. Fukuoka, N. 1970. Contributions to the Flora of Southeast Asia. S. E. Asian Stud. 8: 305-336.
28. Gouy, M., Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2010. Seaview version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molec. Biol. Evol. 27: 221-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp259
29. Govaerts, R., Andersson, L., Robbrecht, E., Bridson, D., Davis, A., Schanzer, I. & Sonke, B. 2011. World checklist of Rubiaceae. Kew: The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ (accessed 17 June 2011).
30. Groeninckx, I., Dessein, S., Ochoterena, H., Persson, C., Motley, T.J., Kårehed, J., Bremer, B., Huysmans, S. & Smets, E. 2009. Phylogeny of the herbaceous tribe Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae) based on plastid DNA data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 109-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.3417/2006201
31. Groeninckx, I., Briggs, M., Davus, A., De Block, P., Robbrecht, E., Smets, E. & Dessein, S. 2010a. A new herbaceous genus endemic to madagascar: Phialiphora (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae). Taxon 59: 1815-1829.
32. Groeninckx, I., De Block, P., Robbrecht, E., Smets, E.E. & Dessein, S. 2010b. Amphistemon and Thamnoldenlandia, two new genera of Rubiaceae (Spermacoceae) endemic to Madagascar. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 163: 447-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01060.x
33. Groeninckx, I., Ochoterena, H., Smets, E. & Dessein, S. 2010c. Molecular phylogenetic and morphological study of Kohautia (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae), with the recognition of the new genus Cordylostigma. Taxon 59: 1457-1471.
34. Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520
35. Guo, X., Simmons, M.P., But, P.P.H., Shaw, P.C. & Wang, R.J. 2011. Application of DNA barcodes in Hedyotis L. (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae). J. Syst. Evol. 49: 203-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00130.x
36. Hiern, W.P. 1877. Order LXX. Rubiaceae. Pp. 33-247 in: Oliver, D. (ed.), Flora of Tropical Africa, vol. 3. London: Reeve.
37. Hitchcock, A.S. 1929. Genera 1-500. Pp. 114-155 in: Hitchcock, A.S. & Green, M.L. (eds.), Standard species of Linnean genera of Phanerogamae (1753-54). Pp. 111-199 in: International Botanical Congress Cambridge (England), 1930: Nomenclature; Proposals by British Botanists. London: His Majesty's Stationary Office.
38. Hochreutiner, B.P.G. 1934. Plantae Hochreuterianae: Etude systématique et biologique des collections faites par l'auteur au cours de son voyage aux Indes néerlandaises et autour du monde pendant les années 1903 à 1905 (fasc. 3). Candollea 5: 175-341.
39. Hooker, J.D. 1873. Ordo LXXXIV. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151 in: Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (eds.), Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata definata. London: Reeve.
40. Hooker, J.D. 1880. Order LXXV. Rubiaceae. Pp. 17-210 in: Hooker, J.D. (ed.), Flora of British India, vol. 3. London: Reeve.
41. Hooker, W.J. & Walker-Arnott, G.A. 1841. The Botany of Captain Beechey's voyage. London: Bohn.
42. Jarvis, C.E. 1992. Seventy-Two proposals for the conservation of types of selected Linnaean generic names, the report of subcommittee 3C on the lectotypification of Linnaean generic names. Taxon 41: 552-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1222833
43. Kårehed, J. & Bremer, B. 2007. The systematics of Knoxieae (Rubi aceae)-Molecular data and their taxonomic consequences. Taxon 56: 1051-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065904
44. Kårehed, J., Groeninckx, I., Dessein, S., Motley, T.J. & Bremer, B. 2008. The phylogenetic utility of chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers and the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae tribe Spermacoceae. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 49: 843-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.09.025
45. Larget, B. & Simon, D.L. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 750-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026160
46. Lewis, W.H. 1966. The Asian genus Neanotis nomen novum (Anotis) and allied taxa in the Americas (Rubiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 53: 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2394973
47. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius.
48. Lo, H., Ko, W., Chen, W., Hsue, H. & Wu, H. 1999. Angiospermae Dicotyledoneae Rubiaceae (1). Pp. 1-427 in: Lo, H. (ed.) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 71(1). Beijing: Science Press.
49. Löhne, C. & Borsch, T. 2005. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: A case study in basal angiosperms. Molec. Biol. Evol. 22: 317-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi019
50. Mena, P. 1990. A revision of the genus Arcytophyllum (Rubiaceae: Hedyotideae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 60: 1-26.
51. Merrill, E.D. & Metcalf, F.P. 1942. Hedyotis Linnaeus versus Oldenlandia Linnaeus and the status of Hedyotis lancea Thunberg in relation to H. consanguinea Hance. J. Arnold. Arbor. 23: 226-230.
52. Merrill, E.D. & Perry, L.M. 1945. Plantae Papuanae Archboldianae, XV. J. Arnold. Arbor. 26: 1-36.
53. Neupane, S., Dessein, S. & Motley, T.J. 2009. The Hedyotis-Oldenlandia-Kohautia complex (Rubiaceae) in Nepal: A study of fruit, seed and pollen characters and their taxonomic significance. Edinburgh J. Bot. 66: 371-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0960428609990035
54. Nylander, J.A.A., Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Nieves-Aldrey, J.L. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53: 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150490264699
55. Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala University Evolutionary Biology Centre.
56. Oxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00987959
57. Piesschaert, F., Jansen, S., Jaimes, I., Robbrecht, E. & Smets, E. 2001. Morphology, anatomy, and taxonomic position of Pagameopsis (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae). Brittonia 53: 490-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02809649
58. Popp, M. & Oxelman, B. 2001. Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 20: 474-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0977
59. Puff, C. & Igersheim, A. 1994. The character states and taxonomic position of Metabolos Bl. (syn. Allaeophania Thw.) (Rubiaceae). Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 63: 241-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3668251
60. Ridsdale, C.E. 1998. Rubiaceae, Tribe Hedyotideae. Pp. 236-284 in: Dassanayake, M.D. (ed.), A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon, vol. 12. Rotterdam: Balkema.
61. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-271.
62. Robbrecht, E. 1993. Supplement to the 1988 outline of the classification of the Rubiaceae. index to genera. Pp. 173-196 in: Robbrecht, E. (ed.), Advances in Rubiaceae macrosystematics. Opera Bot. Belg. 6: 173-195.
63. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
64. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflantzenfamilien, vol. 4. Leipzig.
65. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369
66. Sivarajan, V.V. & Biju, S.D. 1990. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Hedyotis corymbosa-diffusa complex (Rubiaceae) in India. Taxon 39: 665-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1223392
67. Staden, R. 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package. Molec. Biotechnol. 5: 233-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02900361
68. Staden, R., Beal, K.F. & Bonfield, J.K. 2000. The Staden package, 1998. Pp. 115-130 in: Misener, S. & Krawets, S.A. (eds.), Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology 132. New Jersey, U.S.A.: Humana Press.
69. Terrell, E.E. 1975. Relationships of Hedyotis fruticosa L. to Houstonia L. and Oldenlandia L. Phytologia 31: 418-421.
70. Terrell, E.E. 1991. Overview and annotated list of North American species of Hedyotis, Houstonia, Oldenlandia (Rubiaceae), and related genera. Phytologia 71: 212-243.
71. Terrell, E.E. 1996. Revision of Houstonia (Rubiaceae-Hedyotideae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 48: 1-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25027862
72. Terrell, E.E. 2001a. Stenotis (Rubiaceae), a new segregate genus from Baja California, Mexico. Sida 19: 899-911.
73. Terrell, E.E. 2001b. Taxonomic review of Houstonia acerosa and H. palmeri, with notes on Hedyotis and Oldenlandia (Rubiaceae). Sida 19: 913-922.
74. Terrell, E.E. 2001c. Taxonomy of Stenaria (Rubiaceae; Hedyotideae), a new genus including Hedyotis nigricans. Sida 19: 591-614.
75. Terrell, E.E. & Robinson, H. 2003. Survey of Asian and Pacific species of Hedyotis and Exallage (Rubiaceae) with nomenclatural notes on Hedyotis types. Taxon 52: 775-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3647351
76. Terrell, E.E. & Robinson, H. 2007. Seed and capsule morphology in six genera of Hedyotideae (Rubiaceae): Thecagonum, Neanotis, Dentella, Kohautia, Pentodon, and Oldenlandiopsis. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 373-384.
77. Terrell, E.E., Robinson, H.E., Wagner, W.L. & Lorence, D.H. 2005. Resurrection of genus Kadua for Hawaiian Hedyotidinae (Rubi aceae), with emphasis on seed and fruit characters and notes on South Pacific species. Syst. Bot. 30: 818-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364405775097716
78. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État Bruxelles 28: 209-281.
79. Wight, R. & Arnott, G.A.W. 1834. Prodromus Florae Peninsulae Indiae Orientalis, vol. 1. London: Parbury, Allen & Co.