Application of DNA barcodes in Hedyotis L. (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae)

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 203-212

  Guo, Xing ^a,b   Simmons, Mark P ^c   But, Paul Pui Hay ^d   Shaw, Pang Chui ^d   Wang, Rui Jiang ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^d CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

DNA barcode; Hedyotis; Molecular identification; Rubiaceae; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

HEDYOTIS; RUBIACEAE; SPERMACOCEAE;

EID: 84860418521     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00130.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersson L, Rova JHE, Guarin FA. 2002. Relationships, circumscription, and biogeography of Arcytophyllum (Rubiaceae) based on evidence from cpDNA. Brittonia 54: 40-49. (Pubitemid 34577514)
2. Bremekamp CEB. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schumann. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie vanWetenschappen, Afd. Natuurkunde, Ser. 2, 48: 1-298.
3. Bremekamp CEB. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 15: 1-33.
4. CBOL Plant Working Group. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 12794-12797.
5. Chen S-L, Yao H, Han J-P, Liu C, Song J-Y, Shi L-C, Zhu Y-J, Ma X-Y, Gao T, Pang X-H, Luo K, Li Y, Li X-W, Jia X-C, Lin Y-L, Leon C. 2010. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5: e8613.
6. Chen T. 2008. Notes on the identity of Hedyotis yangchunensis (Rubiaceae) in Hong Kong. Harvard Papers in Botany 13: 283-288.
7. Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ, Savolainen V. 2006. 300, 000 species to identify: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon 55: 611-616. (Pubitemid 44534837)
8. Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of the Caryophyllales based on 18SrDNA, rbcL, atpB and matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 132-144. (Pubitemid 34196580)
9. Dutta R, Deb DB. 2004. Taxonomic Revision of Hedyotis L. (Rubiaceae) in Indian Subcontinent. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.
10. Edwards D, Horn A, Taylor D, Savolainen V, Hawkins JA. 2008. DNA barcoding of a large genus, Aspalathus L. (Fabaceae). Taxon 57: 1317-1327.
11. Fay MF, Swensen SM, Chase MW. 1997. Taxonomic affinities of Medusagyne oppositifolia (Medusagynaceae). Kew Bulletin 52: 111-120. (Pubitemid 27205072)
12. Fosberg FR. 1943. The Polynesian species of Hedyotis (Rubiaceae). Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 147: 1-102.
13. Fosberg FR, Sachet MH. 1991. Studies in Indo-Pacific Rubiaceae. Allertonia 6: 191-278.
14. Groeninckx I, Dessein S, Ochoterena H, Persson C, Motley T, Kärehed J, Bremer B, Huysmans S, Smets E. 2009. Phylogeny of the herbaceous tribe Spermacoceae (Rubiaceae) based on plastid DNA data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96: 109-132.
15. Hao M-G, Liu Z-Q, Wang G-L. 2004. Application of the sequences of rDNA ITS to identify Chinese crude drug Hedyotis diffusa. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Natural Science) 27: 188-191.
16. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 313-321. (Pubitemid 36228536)
17. Kang H-W, Cho A-G, Yoon U-H, Eun M-Y. 1998. A rapid DNA extraction method for RFLP and PCR analysis from a single dry seed. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 16: 1-9.
18. Kärehed J, Groeninckx I, Dessein S, Motley T, Bremer B. 2008. The phylogenetic utility of plastid and nuclearDNAmarkers and the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae tribe Spermacoceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 843-866.
19. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008a. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 286-298. (Pubitemid 351890825)
20. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008b. Improved accuracy of multiple ncRNA alignment by incorporating structural information into a MAFFT-based framework. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 212.
21. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120. (Pubitemid 11166431)
22. Ko W-C. 1999. Hedyotis Linn. In: Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. 71: 26-77.
23. Kondo K, Shiba M, Yamaji H, Morota T, Zhengmin C, Huixia P, Shoyama Y. 2007. Species identification of licorice using nrDNA and cpDNA genetic markers. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 30: 1497-1502. (Pubitemid 47282204)
24. Kress WJ, Erickson DL. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the noncoding trnH-psbA spacer region. PloS One 2: e508.
25. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of theNationalAcademy of Sciences USA 102: 8369-8374. (Pubitemid 40803501)
26. Li M, Jiang R-W, Hon P-M, Cheng L, Li L-L, Zhou J-R, Shaw P-C, But PPH. 2010. Authentication of the anti-tumor herb Baihuasheshecao with bioactive marker compounds and molecular sequences. Food Chemistry 119: 1239-1245.
27. Lin C-C, Ng L-T, Yang J-J. 2004. Antioxidant activity of extracts of peh-huejuwa-chi-cao in a cell free system. American Journal of Chinese Medicine 32: 339-349. (Pubitemid 39089160)
28. Löhne C, Borsch T. 2005. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: a case study in basal angiosperms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 317-332. (Pubitemid 40130199)
29. Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2001. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution version 4. 03. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
30. Merrill ED, Metcalf FP. 1942. Hedyotis Linnaeus versus Oldenlandia Linnaeus and the status of Hedyotis lancea Thunberg in relation to H. consanguinea Hance. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 23: 226-230.
31. Müller K. 2005. SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Applied Bioinformatics 4: 65-69. (Pubitemid 41043903)
32. Nixon KC, Davis JI. 1991. Polymorphic taxa, missing values and cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7: 233-241.
33. Olmstead RG, Michaels HJ, Scotts KM, Palmer JD. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
34. Popp M, Oxelman B. 2001. Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 474-481. (Pubitemid 32835892)
35. Ren B-Q, Xiang X-G, Chen Z-D. 2010. Species identification of Alnus (Betulaceae) using nrDNA and cpDNA genetic markers. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 594-605.
36. Robbrecht E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 1: 1-271.
37. Robbrecht E, Manen JF. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nrDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps16, trnL-F and atpB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Systematics and Geography of Plants 76: 85-146. (Pubitemid 44065541)
38. Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136. (Pubitemid 28106981)
39. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DW, Specht CD. 2007. DNA barcoding in the Cycadales: testing the potential of proposed barcoding markers for species identification of Cycads. PLoS One 2: e1154.
40. Simmons MP. 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 874-879. (Pubitemid 38610960)
41. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
42. Sivarajan VV, Biju SD. 1990. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the Hedyotis corymbosa-diffusa complex (Rubiaceae) in India. Taxon 39: 665-674.
43. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP. : Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). V. 4. 0 beta 10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
44. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4. 0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599. (Pubitemid 47236692)
45. Tate JA, Simpson BB. 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploidy species. Systematic Botany 28: 723-737. (Pubitemid 37446934)
46. Terrell EE. 1975. Relationships of Hedyotis fruticosa L. to Houstonia L. and Oldenlandia L. Phytologia 31: 418-424.
47. Terrell EE. 1991. Overview and annotated list of North American species of Hedyotis, Houstonia, Oldenlandia (Rubiaceae), and related genera. Phytologia 71: 212-243.
48. Terrell EE. 2001. Taxonomic review of Houstonia acerosa and H. palmeri, with notes on Hedyotis and Oldenlandia (Rubiaceae). Sida 19: 913-922. (Pubitemid 34082107)
49. Verdcourt B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de I'État a Bruxelles 28: 209-281.
50. Verdcourt B. 1976. Rubiaceae (Part I). In: Polhill RM ed. Flora of Tropical East Africa. London: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations. 268-315.
51. Wang R-J, Zhao N-X. 2001. The origin and distribution on genus Hedyotis L. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 9: 219-228.