An ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera for evaluation of corneal deformation response and its impact on IOP measurement

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2885-2892

  Leung, Christopher Kai Shun ^a   Ye, Cong ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corneal deformation response; Intraocular pressure; Ultra high speed scheimpflug camera

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPHTHALMIC CAMERA; OPTOMETRY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION ERROR; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AIR MOVEMENTS; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; TIME FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876532716     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11563     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Weinreb RN, Brandt JD, Garway-Heath D, eds. Intraocular Pressure. Consensus Series 4. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2007:17-58.
2. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155.
3. Dupps WJ Jr, Netto MV, Herekar S, et al. Surface wave elastometry of the cornea in porcine and human donor eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:66-75.
4. Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, et al. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:553-562.
5. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3790-3794.
6. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, et al. Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthal mol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5337-5347.
7. British Standards Institution. Precision of Test Methods 1: Guide for the Determination and Reproducibility for a Standard Test Method (BS 597, Part 1). London: BSI; 1975.
8. Bland JM. How can I decide the sample size for a repeatability study? Available at: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/mb55/meas/sizerep.htm. Accessed October 28, 2012.
9. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1993:505-528.
10. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1287-1293.
11. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:359-366.
12. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:344-350.
13. Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2472-2477.
14. Bao F, Jiang L, Wang X, et al. Assessment of the ex vivo biomechanical properties of porcine cornea with inflation test for corneal xenotransplantation. J Med Eng Technol. 2012;36: 17-21.
15. Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Rama P. Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:783-790.
16. Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Marshall J. Age-related differences in the elasticity of the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4324-4329.
17. Elsheikh A, Geraghty B, Rama P, et al. Characterization of age related variation in corneal biomechanical properties. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7:1475-1485.
18. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Pye D. Determination of the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:808-818.
19. Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, et al. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:443-449.