Haptic collision handling for simulation of transnasal surgery

Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 127-141

  Neubauer, André ^a   Brooks, Rupert ^a   Brouwer, Iman ^a   Debergue, Patricia ^a   Laroche, Denis ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

collision handling; haptics; surgical simulation; transnasal endoscopy; virtual coupling

Indexed keywords

COLLISION HANDLING; CONTINUOUS COLLISION DETECTION; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; HAPTICS; POSITION AND ORIENTATIONS; SURGICAL SIMULATION; TISSUE DEFORMATIONS; VIRTUAL COUPLING;

ALGORITHMS; ENDOSCOPY; HAPTIC INTERFACES; TISSUE;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 84876484104     PISSN: 15464261     EISSN: 1546427X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cav.1489     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bockholt U, Müller W, Voss G, Ecke U, Klimek L,. Real-time simulation of tissue deformation for the nasal endoscopy simulator (NES). Comput Aided Surgery 1999; 4 (5): 281-285.
2. Wolfsberger S, Neubauer A, Bühler K., Wegenkittl R, Czech T, Gentzsch S, Böcher-Schwarz H-G, Knosp E,. Advanced virtual endoscopy for endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (5): 1009-1019.
3. Parikh SS, Chan S, Agrawal SK, Hwang PH, Salisbury CM, Rafii BY, Varma G, Salisbury KJ, Blevins NH,. Integration of patient-specific paranasal sinus computed tomographic data into a virtual surgical environment. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy 2009; 23 (4): 442-447.
4. Perez-Gutierrez B, Martinez DM, Rojas OE,. Endoscopic endonasal haptic surgery simulator prototype: A rigid endoscope model, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Waltham, MA, 2010; 297-298.
5. Caversaccio M, Eichenberger A, Hausler R,. Virtual simulator as a training tool for endonasal surgery. American Journal of Rhinology 2003; 17 (5): 283-290.
6. Neubauer A, Wolfsberger S, Forster M-T, Mroz L, Wegenkittl R, Bühler K,. Advanced virtual endoscopic pituitary surgery. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 2005; 11 (5): 497-507.
7. Çakmak H, Maaß H, Trantakis C, Strauß G, Nowatius E, Kühnapfel U,. Haptic ventriculostomy simulation in a grid environment. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 2009; 20 (1): 25-38.
8. Tolsdorff B, Pommert A, Höhne KH, Petersik A, Pflesser B, Tiede U, Leuwer R,. Virtual reality: A new paranasal sinus surgery simulator. The Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (2): 420-426.
9. Moore M, Wilhelms J,. Collision detection and response for computer animation, In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Atlanta, GA, 1988; 289-298.
10. Mahvash M, Hayward V,. Haptic simulation of a tool in contact with a nonlinear deformable body, In IS4TM'03: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling, Juan-Les-Pins, France, 2003; 311-320.
11. Johnson DE, Willemsen P,. Six degree-of-freedomhaptic rendering of complex polygonal models, In Proceedings of International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles, CA, 2003; 229-235.
12. Forest C, Delingette H, Ayache N,. Surface contact and reaction force models for laparoscopic simulation, In Proceedings of International Symposium on Medical Simulation, Cambridge, MA, 2004; 168-176.
13. García-Pérez V, Muñoz Moreno E, Aja-Fernández S, Alberola-Lõpez C,. A 3-D collision handling algorithm for surgery simulation based on feedback fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2009; 13 (4): 451-457.
14. Keiser R, Müller M, Heidelberger B, Teschner M, Gross MH,. Contact handling for deformable point-based objects, In Proceedings of Vision Modeling Visualization (VMV), Stanford, CA, 2004; 315-322.
15. Picinbono G, Lombardo J-C, Delingette H, Ayache N,. Improving realism of a surgery simulator: linear anisotropic elasticity, complex interactions and force extrapolation. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 2002; 13 (3): 147-167.
16. Zilles CB, Salisbury JK,. A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display, In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995; 146-151.
17. Colgate JE, Stanley MC, Brown JM,. Issues in haptic display of tool use, In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995; 140-145.
18. McNeely WA, Puterbaugh KD, Troy JJ,. Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering using voxel sampling, In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, CA, 1999; 401-408.
19. Barbič J, James DL,. Time-critical distributed contact for 6-DoF haptic rendering of adaptively sampled reduced deformable models, In Proceedings of 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, San Diego, CA, August 2007; 171-180.
20. Otaduy MA, Gross M,. Transparent rendering of tool contact with compliant environments, In Proceedings of the Second Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Tsukuba, Japan, 2007; 225-230.
21. Saupin G, Duriez C, Cotin S,. Contact model for haptic medical simulations, In Proceedings of International Symposium on Biomedical Simulation (ISBMS), London, UK, 2008; 157-165.
22. Barbagli F, Salisbury K, Prattichizzo D,. Dynamic local models for stable multi-contact haptic interaction with deformable objects, In HAPTICS '03: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS'03), Los Angeles, CA, 2003; 109-116.
23. Salisbury K, Conti F, Barbagli F,. Haptic rendering: Introductory concepts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2004; 24 (2): 24-32.
24. Hay A, Borggaard J, Akhtar I, Pelletier D,. Reduced-order models for parameter dependent geometries based on shape sensitivity analysis. Journal of Computational Physics 2010; 229 (4): 1327-1352.
25. Ortega M, Redon S, Coquillart S,. A six degree-of-freedom god-object method for haptic display of rigid bodies, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Alexandria, VA, 2006; 197-204.