Recognition of categorised words: Repetition effects in rote study

Memory

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 467-481

  Singer, Murray ^a   Fazaluddin, Anjum ^a   Andrew, Kathy N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Criterion shift; Memory; Mirror effect; Recognition; Repetition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; REPETITION PRIMING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPETITION PRIMING; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876448095     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2012.739625     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. 1969. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut Category Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80 3, Part 2. doi: 10.1037/h0027577
2. Benjamin, A. S. 2001. On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 27: 941-947. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.941
3. Benjamin, A. S. and Bawa, S. 2004. Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition. Journal of Memory& Language, 51: 159-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.001
4. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F. and Estrada, S. 2006. Recollection rejection of false narrative statements. Memory, 14: 672-691. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648449
5. Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F. and Mojardin, A. H. 2001. Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 27: 307-329. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.307
6. Brown, J., Lewis, V. J. and Monk, A. F. 1977. Memorability, word frequency, and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29: 461-473. doi: 10.1080/14640747708400622
7. Bruno, D., Higham, P. A. and Perfect, T. J. 2009. Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory& Cognition, 37: 807-818. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.807
8. Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11: 671-684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
9. Criss, A. H. 2006. The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memoryand Language, 55: 461-478.
10. Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J. and Park, H. 2006. Models of recognition. A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13: 1-21. doi: 10.3758/BF03193807
11. Dobbins, I. G. and Kroll, N. E. A. 2005. Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: Evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 31: 1186-1198. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1186
12. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D. and Cote, N. C. 1990. Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memoryand Language, 29: 566-582. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90052-2
13. Gaissmaier, W. and Schooler, L. J. 2008. The smart potential behind probability matching. Cognition, 109: 416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.007
14. Gallo, D. A., Meadow, N. G., Johnson, E. L. and Foster, K. T. 2008. Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task. Journal of Memoryand Language, 58: 1095-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.001
15. Glanzer, M. and Adams, J. K. 1985. The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory& Cognition, 13: 8-20. doi: 10.3758/BF03198438
16. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K. and Iverson, G. J. 1991. Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Concentering of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 17: 81-93. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.81
17. Glanzer, M. and Bowles, N. 1976. Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2: 21-31.
18. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A. and Adams, J. K. 1999. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 25: 500-513. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.500
19. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics, New York, NY: Wiley.
20. Healy, A. F. and Kubovy, M. 1981. Probability matching and the formation of conservative decision rules in a numerical analog of signal detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7: 344-354. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.7.5.344
21. Hicks, J. L. and Marsh, R. L. 1998. A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 24: 1105-1120. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1105
22. Higham, P. A., Perfect, T. J. and Bruno, D. 2009. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 35: 57-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013865
23. Hirshman, E. 1995. Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 21: 302-313. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.302
24. Hirshman, E. and Arndt, J. 1997. Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 23: 1306-1323. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1306
25. Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J. and Passannante, A. 2002. Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory& Language, 47: 499-516. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00017-7
26. Hockley, W. E. 2008a. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Memory& Cognition, 36: 1351-1359. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1351
27. Hockley, W. E. 2008b. The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 34: 1412-1429. doi: 10.1037/a0013016
28. Hockley, W. E. 2011. " Criterion changes: How flexible are recognition decision processes? ". In Constructions of remembering and metacognition: Essays in honor of Bruce Whittlesea, Edited by: Higham, P. and Leboe, J. 155-166. Houndmills,UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Humphreys, M. S. 1978. Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17: 175-188. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90137-8
30. Huppert, F. A. and Piercy, M. 1978. The role of trace strength in recency and frequency judgements by amnesic and control subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30: 347-354. doi: 10.1080/14640747808400681
31. Joordens, S. and Hockley, W. E. 2000. Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 26: 1534-1555. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1534
32. Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. 2005. Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Maddox, W. T. and Estes, W. K. 1997. Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 23: 539-559. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.539
34. Mandler, G. 1980. Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87: 252-271. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
35. McClelland, J. L. and Chappell, M. 1998. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105: 724-760. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760
36. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K. and Cobb, R. E. 1986. Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memoryand Language, 25: 645-656. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90041-0
37. McDermott, K. B. and Chan, J. C. K. 2006. Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences. Memory& Cognition, 34: 1273-1284. doi: 10.3758/BF03193271
38. Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S. and Wixted, J. T. 2002. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 28: 1095-1110. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1095
39. Norman, M. F. and Yellott, J. I. 1966. Probability matching. Psychometrika, 31: 43-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02289456
40. Niewiadomski, M. W. and Hockley, W. E. 2001. Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of familiarity-based accounts of the revelation effect. Memory& Cognition, 29: 1130-1138. doi: 10.3758/BF03206382
41. Ohrt, D. D. and Gronlund, S. D. 1999. " List-length effect and continuous memory: Confounds and solutions ". In On human memory: Evolution, progress, and reflections on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin model, Edited by: Izawa, C. 105-125. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
42. Parks, T. 1966. Signal detectability theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 73: 44-58. doi: 10.1037/h0022662
43. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E. and Shiffrin, R. M. 1991. List strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 16: 163-178. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.163
44. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F. and Gronlund, S. D. 1992. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99: 518-536. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.518
45. Rhodes, M. G. and Jacoby, L. L. 2007. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 33: 305-320. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.305
46. Robinson, K. J. and Roediger, Henry L. III. 1997. Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8: 231-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00417.x
47. Roediger, H. L. III and McDermott, K.B. 1995. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 21: 803-814. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
48. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L. and Racine, C. 1999. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memoryand Language, 40: 1-24. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2611
49. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E. and Marinelli, K. 1995. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 21: 267-287. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.267
50. Singer, M. 2009. Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory& Cognition, 37: 976-984. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.976
51. Singer, M. 2011. Erratum to: Singer, M. (2009). Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory& Cognition, 39: 555 doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0078-z
52. Singer, M., Gagnon, N. and Richards, E. 2002. Question answering strategy: The effect of mixing test delays. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56: 41-57. doi: 10.1037/h0087384
53. Singer, M. and Halldorson, M. 1996. Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30: 1-38. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0001
54. Singer, M. and Wixted, J. T. 2006. Effect of delay on recognition decisions: Evidence for a criterion shift. Memory& Cognition, 34: 125-137. doi: 10.3758/BF03193392
55. Starns, J. J., Hicks, J. L. and Marsh, R. L. 2006. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Memory, 14: 742-761. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648514
56. Stretch, V. and Wixted, J. T. 1998a. Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 24: 1397-1410. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1397
57. Stretch, V. and Wixted, J. T. 1998b. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 24: 1379-1396. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1379
58. Treisman, M. and Williams, T. C. 1984. A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91: 68-111. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.68
59. Tussing, A. A. and Greene, R. L. 1999. Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition. Journal of Memoryand Language, 40: 520-533. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2636
60. van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension, New York, NY: Academic Press.
61. Verde, M. F. and Rotello, C. M. 2007. Memorystrength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory& Cognition, 35: 254-262. doi: 10.3758/BF03193446
62. Westerman, D. L. and Greene, R. L. 1998. The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 24: 377-386. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.377
63. Wickens, T. D. 2002. Elementary signal detection theory, Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press.
64. Wixted, J. T. and Stretch, V. 2004. In defense of the signal-detection interpretation of remember/know judgements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11: 616-641. doi: 10.3758/BF03196616
65. Yonelinas, A. P. 2002. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memoryand Language, 46: 441-517. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864