Whole-of-government approach to information technology strategy management: Building a sustainable collaborative technology environment in government

Information Polity

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 243-260

  Ojo, Adegboyega ^a   Janowski, Tomasz ^a   Estevez, Elsa ^a  

^a UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY   (Macao)

Author keywords

IT strategy management; strategy management tool; strategy markup language; StratML; Whole of government framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876422916     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IP-2011-0237     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. A.C. Hax and N.S. Majluf, Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process, 1986.
2. A. Lawson-Body, L. Mukankusi and G. Miller, An Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard for E-Government Service Delivery: A Content Analysis, Journal of Service Science 1 (2008), 75-82.
3. A.M. Cresswell, G.B. Burke and T.A. Pardo, Advancing Return on Investment Analysis for Government IT: A Public Value Framework, 2006.
4. A.M. Thomson and J.L. Perry, Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box, Public Administration Review, 2006.
5. A.Moseley, Joined-Up Government: RationalAdministration orBureaucratic Politics? Public AdministrationCommittee Annual Conference, University of Glamorgan, 2009, pp. 1-26.
6. A. Ojo, B.P. Shah and T. Janowski, Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations-Toolkit, eMacao Systems Report, No. 077, April 2008, at: http://www.emacao.egov.iist.unu.edu/index.php/emacao/projects/ Strategic-IT-Planning-for-Public-Agencies.
7. A. Ojo, B.P. Shah and T. Janowski, Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations-Templates, eMacao Systems Report, No. 078, April 2008, at: http://www.emacao.egov.iist.unu.edu/index.php/emacao/projects/ Strategic-IT-Planningfor-Public-Agencies.
8. Australian Public Service Commission, Connecting Government: Whole-of-Government Responses to Australia's Priority Challenges, 2004.
9. B. Klievink and M. Janssen, Realizing Joined-Up Government-Dynamic Capabilities and Stage Models for Transformation, Government Information Quarterly 26 (Apr 2009), 275-284.
10. C.D. Coning, H. Lurås, N.N. Schia and S. Ulriksen, Norway's Whole-of-Government Approach and its Engagement with Afghanistan, 2009.
11. C. Huxham, Leadership in the Shaping and Implementation of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen in a (Not Quite) Joined-up World, Management 43 (2000), 1159-1175.
12. D. Sedera, G. Gable and M. Rosemann, A Balanced Scorecard Approach to Enterprise Systems Performance Measurement, 12th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2000.
13. E. Bardach, Can Network Theory Illuminate Interagency Collaboration? Workshop on Network Analysis and Innovations in Public Programs, Sept 29-Oct 1, 1994, LaFollette Institute of Public Affairs, University ofWisconsin-Madison, 1994, pp. 1-24.
14. E. Estevez, A.Ojo and T. Janowski, Idioms for Collaborative GovernmentNetworks-Conceptualization and Applications to Seamless Services, 11th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, Saint-Etienne, France, 11-13 October 2010, Springer, 2010, pp. 219-226.
15. E. Korteland and V. Bekkers, Diffusion of E-government Innovations in the Dutch Public Sector: The Case of Digital Community Policing, Electronic Government, Springer, 2007, pp. 252-264.
16. H. Mintzberg, The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Pearson Education, 2000.
17. I.Cobbold and G. Lawrie, The Development of theBalanced Scorecard as a StrategicManagement Tool, PMAConference, 2002.
18. IT Governance Institute, Enterprise Value: Governance of IT Investments-The Val IT Framework 2.0, 2008.
19. J. Baker, Quick Impact Projects: Towards a 'Whole of Government' Approach, A Graduate Journal of International Affairs 8 (2007), 1-21.
20. J. Fedorowicz, U. Gelinasjr, J. Gogan and C. Williams, Strategic Alignment of Participant Motivations in e-Government Collaborations: The Internet Payment Platform Pilot, Government Information Quarterly 26 (Jan 2009), 51-59.
21. J.M. Bryson, A Strategic Planning Process for Public and Non-profit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, Jossey-Bass, 2004.
22. J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, I. Chengalur-Smith and P. Duchessi, Collaborative e-Government: Impediments and Benefits of Information-Sharing Projects in the Public Sector, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (Apr 2007), 121-133.
23. K. Nguyen, A. Ojo and T. Janowski, Strategic IT Planning for Public Organizations-System, eMacao Systems Report, No. 079, April 2008, available at: http://www.emacao.egov.iist.unu.edu/index.php/emacao/projects/ Strategic-IT-Planning-for-Public-Agencies
24. K. Parisopoulos, E. Tambouris and K. Tarabanis, Transformational Government in Europe: ASurvey ofNational Policies, M.D. Lytras et al (Eds), WSKS 2009, LNAI 5736, Springer-Verlag, 2009, pp. 462-471.
25. L. Camarinha-Matos and H. Afsarmanesh, Towards a Reference Models for Collaborative Networked Organizations, Information Technology for Balanced Manufacturing Systems, BASYS2006, Niagra Falls, Canada, 4-5 September 2006, Springer, 2006, pp. 1-10.
26. L.F. Luna-Reyes and D.L. Andersen, Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data for System Dynamics: Methods and Models, System Dynamics Review 19 (2003), 271-296. (Pubitemid 38179253)
27. L.J. Black, A.M. Cresswell, T.A. Pardo, F. Thompson, D.S. Canestraro, M. Cook, L.F. Luna, I.J.Martinez, D.F. Andersen and G.P. Richardson, A Dynamic Theory of Collaboration: A Structural Approach to Facilitating Intergovernmental Use of Information Technology, 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
28. M. Isoraite, The Balanced Scorecard Method: From Theory to Practice, Intellectual Economics 1 (2008), 18-28.
29. M. Sorrentino and E. Ferro, Does the Answer to eGovernment Lie in Intermunicipal Collaboration? An Exploratory Italian Case Study, EGOV 2008, W.M. A., H.J. Scholl and E. Ferro, eds, LNCS 5184, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 1-12.
30. M.K. Sein, Conceptualizing the ICT Artifact: Toward Understanding the Role of ICT in National Development, Information Society 20 (2004), 15-24. (Pubitemid 38260120)
31. OECD, Whole of Government Approaches to Fragile States, Paris, France, 2006.
32. P. Gershon, Review of the Australian Government's Use of Information and Communication Technology, 2008.
33. P.R. Niven, Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies, Wiley, 2008.
34. R. Nag, D.C. Hambrick and M.J. Chen, What is Strategic Management, Really? Inductive Derivation of a Consensus Definition of the Field, Strategic Management Journal 28 (2007), 935-955. (Pubitemid 47245737)
35. R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, Harvard Business Review.
36. S. Hunt, Whole-of-Government: Does Working Together Work, 2005.
37. S. Jenner, Realising Benefits from Government ICT Investment-a Fool's Errand?, Academic Publishing International Ltd, 2009.
38. S.S. Dawes and L. Pŕefontaine, Understanding New Models of Collaboration for Delivering Government Services, Communications of the ACM 46 (2003), 40-42.
39. S.S. Dawes, Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(3) (1996), 377-394.
40. Strategy Markup Language Community of Practice, Strategy Markup Language (StratML), at: http://www.xml.gov/stratml/index.htm.
41. Strategy Markup Language Community of Practice, Strategy Markup Language Value Proposition, 2006, at: http://www.xml.gov/stratml/index.htm.
42. T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform, Public Administration Review 67 (2007), 1059-1066.
43. T. Hoel and P. Hollins, Learning Technology Standards Adoption-How to Improve Process and Product Legitimacy, 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT'08, IEEE, 2008, pp. 587-589.
44. T.H. Stanton, Improving Collaboration by Federal Agencies: An Essential Priority for the Next Administration, 2008.
45. T.P. Morgan, Global IT Spending Will Rise in 2009 (slightly), 2009.
46. United States General Accounting Office (GAO), Results-Oriented Government-Practices That Can Help Enhance and Sustain Collaboration among Federal Agencies, 2005.
47. United States General Accounting Office (GAO), Measuring Performance and Demonstrating Results of Information Technology Investments: Executive Guide, 1998.