The effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization on stomatal conductance estimated from 11 years of scaled sap flux measurements at Duke FACE

Tree Physiology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 135-151

  Ward, Eric J ^a,b   Oren, Ram ^a,c   Bell, David M ^a   Clark, James S ^a,d   McCarthy, Heather R ^e   Kim, Hyun Seok ^f   Domec, Jean Christophe ^a,b,g  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d Duke University   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^f Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^g BORDEAUX SCIENCES AGRO   (France)

Author keywords

Allometry; Hierarchical Bayes; Hydraulic architecture; Jarvis model; Leaf area; Liquidambar styraciflua; Photosynthetic active radiation; Pinus taeda; Sapwood area; Soil moisture; Tree height; Vapor pressure deficit

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONIFEROUS TREE; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; HEIGHT; LEAF AREA; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NITROGEN; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRANSPIRATION; VAPOR PRESSURE;

LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA; PINUS TAEDA;

CARBON DIOXIDE; FERTILIZER; NITROGEN; WATER;

ARTICLE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIQUIDAMBAR; LOBLOLLY PINE; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; SOIL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; TREE; VAPOR PRESSURE; WOOD;

CARBON DIOXIDE; FERTILIZERS; LIQUIDAMBAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PINUS TAEDA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SOIL; TIME FACTORS; TREES; VAPOR PRESSURE; WATER; WOOD;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876365351     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps118     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. 2. New Phytol 165:351-372. (Pubitemid 40177950)
2. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ 30:258-270. (Pubitemid 46184429)
3. Bell DM (2011) Longterm approaches to assessing tree community responses to resource limitation and climate variation. Doctoral Dissertation, University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, p 167. doi:10.1097/00000637-199510000-00004.
4. Buckley TN, Roberts DW (2005) How should leaf area, sapwood area and stomatal conductance vary with tree height to maximize growth? Tree Physiol 26:145.
5. Bush SE, Hultine KR, Sperry JS, Ehleringer JR (2010) Calibration of thermal dissipation sap flow probes for ring- and diffuse-porous trees. Tree Physiol 30:1545-1554.
6. 2 on woody plants. New Phytol 127:425-446.
7. 2 levels. Ann Bot 75:609-617. (Pubitemid 26450176)
8. Clark JS, Agarwal P, Bell DM, Flikkema PG, Gelfand A, Nguyen X, Ward E, Yang J (2011) Inferential ecosystem models, from network data to prediction. Ecol Appl 21:1523-1536.
9. Curtis PS, Teeri JA (1992) Seasonal responses of leaf gas exchange to elevated carbon dioxide in Populus grandidentata. Can J For Res 22:1320-1325.
10. Domec JC, Pruyn ML, Gartner BL (2005) Axial and radial profiles in conductivities, water storage and native embolism in trunks of young and old-growth ponderosa pine trees. Plant Cell Environ 28:1103-1113.
11. Domec JC, Noormets A, King JS, Sun GE, McNulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Boggs JL, Treasure EA (2009a) Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. Plant Cell Environ 32:980-991.
12. 2 enrichment) and N-fertilization. Plant Cell Environ 32:1500-1512.
13. 2 concentration. Tree Physiol 30:1001-1015.
14. Drake JE, Raetz LM, Davis SC, DeLucia EH (2010) Hydraulic limitation not declining nitrogen availability causes the age-related photosynthetic decline in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Plant Cell Environ 33:1756-1766.
15. 2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. In: Begon A, MacFadyen A (eds). Advances in ecological research. Academic Press, London, pp 1-55.
16. 2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE. Glob Change Biol 18:223-242.
17. Ewers BE, Oren R (2000) Analyses of assumptions and errors in the calculation of stomatal conductance from sap flux measurements. Tree Physiol 20:579.
18. Ewers BE, Oren R, Sperry JS (2000) Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant Cell Environ 23:1055-1066.
19. Ewers BE, Oren R, Johnsen KH, Landsberg JJ (2001) Estimating maximum mean canopy stomatal conductance for use in models. Can J For Res 31:198-207. (Pubitemid 32265458)
20. Ford CR, McGuire MA, Mitchell RJ, Teskey RO (2004) Assessing variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in Pinus species and its effect on daily water use. Tree Physiol 24:241-249. (Pubitemid 38427252)
21. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85:398-409.
22. Gough CM, Seiler JR, Johnsen KH, Sampson DA (2004) Seasonal photosynthesis in fertilized and nonfertilized loblolly pine. For Sci 50:1-9. (Pubitemid 38215617)
23. Granier A (1985) Une nouvelle methode pour la mesure du flux de seve brute dans le tronc des arbres. Ann For Sci 42:193-200.
24. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3:309-320.
25. 2: a broader perspective. Photosynth Res 39:369-388.
26. 2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ 25:379-393. (Pubitemid 34209331)
27. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Ewers BE, Ellsworth DS, Schafer KVR, Oren R (2000) Influence of soil porosity on water use in Pinus taeda. Oecologia 124:495-505.
28. Hendrey GR, Kimball BA (1994) The FACE program. Agric For Meteorol 70:3-14.
29. 2. Glob Change Biol 5:293-309. (Pubitemid 29332441)
30. 2 enrichment. New Phytol 162:387-396. (Pubitemid 38503707)
31. 2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm-temperate forest. Ecology 90:3352-3366.
32. Jarvis PG (1975) Water transfer in plants. In: de Vries DA, Afgan NG (eds) Heat and mass transfer in the environment of vegetation. Scripta Book Company, Washington, DC, pp 369-394.
33. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 593-610.
34. Kim HS, Oren R, Hinckley TM (2008) Actual and potential transpiration and carbon assimilation in an irrigated poplar plantation. Tree Physiol 28:559.
35. Kim H-S, Palmroth S, Therezien M, Stenberg P, Oren R (2011) Analysis of the sensitivity of absorbed light and incident light profile to various canopy architecture and stand conditions. Tree Physiol 31:30-47.
36. Kull O (2002) Acclimation of photosynthesis in canopies: models and limitations. Oecologia 133:267-279. (Pubitemid 36072735)
37. Lewin KF, Hendrey GR, Kolber Z (1992) Brookhaven National Laboratory free-air carbon dioxide enrichment facility. Crit Rev Plant Sci 11:135-141.
38. Loustau D, Domec JC, Bosc A (1998) Interpreting the variations in xylem sap flux density within the trunk of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): application of a model for calculating water flows at tree and stand levels. Ann Sci For 55:29-46. (Pubitemid 28167069)
39. Lu P, Urban L, Zhao P (2004) Granier's thermal dissipation probe (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: theory and practice. Acta Bot Sin 46:631-646. (Pubitemid 39337909)
40. 2 experiment and eddy-flux data. Ecol Appl 11:239-252. (Pubitemid 32113864)
41. Mackay DS, Ewers BE, Loranty MM, Kruger EL, Samanta S (2012) Bayesian analysis of canopy transpiration models: a test of posterior parameter means against measurements. J Hydrol 432-433:75-83.
42. 2 concentration. Tree Physiol 28:597-606. (Pubitemid 351684089)
43. 2]-induced enhancement of productivity and partitioning among aboveground carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19356-19361. (Pubitemid 46026035)
44. 2. Glob Change Biol 13:2479-2497. (Pubitemid 350154323)
45. 2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol 185:514-528.
46. McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond B et al. (2002) The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia 132:12-20. (Pubitemid 36080209)
47. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol 149:247-264. (Pubitemid 32164119)
48. Mencuccini M (2002) Hydraulic constraints in the functional scaling of trees. Tree Physiol 22:553.
49. Mencuccini M (2003) The ecological significance of long-distance water transport: short-term regulation, long-term acclimation and the hydraulic costs of stature across plant life forms. Plant Cell Environ 26:163-182. (Pubitemid 36117286)
50. Moore G, Bond B, Jones J, Meinzer F (2010) Thermal-dissipation sap flow sensors may not yield consistent sap-flux estimates over multiple years. Trees Struct Funct 24:165-174.
51. 2 on gas exchange and growth of forest tree species. J Exp Bot 43:1121-1130.
52. Murthy R, Dougherty PM, Zarnoch SJ, Allen HL (1996) Effects of carbon dioxide, fertilization, and irrigation on photosynthetic capacity of loblolly pine trees. Tree Physiol 16:537-546. (Pubitemid 126562762)
53. 2. Nature 357:322-324.
54. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 22:683-714. (Pubitemid 29298263)
55. Novick K, Oren R, Stoy P, Juang J-Y, Siqueira M, Katul G (2009) The relationship between reference canopy conductance and simplified hydraulic architecture. Adv Water Resour 32:809-819.
56. Oishi AC, Oren R, Stoy PC (2008) Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: a footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 148:1719-1732.
57. Oishi AC, Oren R, Novick KA, Palmroth S, Katul GG (2010) Interannual invariability of forest evapotranspiration and its consequence to water flow downstream. Ecosystems 13:421-436.
58. Oren R, Phillips N, Katul G, Ewers BE, Pataki DE (1998) Scaling xylem sap flux and soil water balance and calculating variance: a method for partitioning water flux in forests. Ann Sci For 55:191-216. (Pubitemid 28167078)
59. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schafer KVR (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 22:1515-1526. (Pubitemid 30057160)
60. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469-472. (Pubitemid 32494390)
61. Pataki DE, Oren R, Tissue DT (1998) Elevated carbon dioxide does not affect average canopy stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda L. Oecologia 117:47-52. (Pubitemid 29000448)
62. Pearcy RW, Schulze ED, Zimmermann R (1989) Measurement of transpiration and leaf conductance. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology, field methods and instrumentation. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 137-160.
63. Phillips N, Oren R (1998) A comparison of daily representations of canopy conductance based on two conditional time-averaging methods and the dependence of daily conductance on environmental factors. Ann Sci For 55:217-235. (Pubitemid 28167079)
64. Phillips N, Oren R, Zimmermann R (1996) Radial patterns of xylem sap flow in non-, diffuse- and ring-porous tree species. Plant Cell Environ 19:983-990. (Pubitemid 27101110)
65. Rayment MB, Loustau D, Jarvis PG (2000) Measuring and modeling conductances of black spruce at three organizational scales: shoot, branch and canopy. Tree Physiol 20:713-723.
66. Ritz C, Spiess AN (2008) qpcR: an R package for sigmoidal model selection in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Bioinformatics 24:1549-1551. (Pubitemid 351911713)
67. 2 atmosphere. New Phytol 139:395-436. (Pubitemid 28364875)
68. Schäfer KVR, Oren R, Tenhunen JD (2000) The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance. Plant Cell Environ 23:365-375. (Pubitemid 30221291)
69. 2 concentration. Glob Change Biol 8:895-911. (Pubitemid 34949672)
70. 2 atmosphere alters carbon assimilation and allocation in a pine forest ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 9:1378-1400. (Pubitemid 37353910)
71. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461-464.
72. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form: the pipe model theory, 1. Jpn J Ecol 14:97-105.
73. Smith DM, Allen SJ (1996) Measurement of sap flow in plant stems. J Exp Bot 47:1833-1844. (Pubitemid 27052612)
74. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ 25:251-263. (Pubitemid 34179270)
75. Steppe K, De Pauw DJW, Doody TM, Teskey RO (2010) A comparison of sap flux density using thermal dissipation, heat pulse velocity and heat field deformation methods. Agric For Meteorol 150:1046-1056.
76. Swanson RH (1972) Water transpired by trees is indicated by heat pulse velocity. Agric Meteorol 10:277-281.
77. Swanson RH, Whitfield DWA (1981) A numerical analysis of heat pulse velocity theory and practice. J Exp Bot 32:221.
78. Taneda H, Sperry JS (2008) A case-study of water transport in cooccurring ring-versus diffuse-porous trees: contrasts in water-status, conducting capacity, cavitation and vessel refilling. Tree Physiol 28:1641-1651.
79. Tateishi M, Kumagai TÄ, Utsumi Y, Umebayashi T, Shiiba Y, Inoue K, Kaji K, Cho K, Otsuki K (2008) Spatial variations in xylem sap flux density in evergreen oak trees with radial-porous wood: comparisons with anatomical observations. Trees Struct Funct 22:23-30. (Pubitemid 351195083)
80. Team RDC (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
81. 2. Trees Struct Funct 10:55-62. (Pubitemid 126523020)
82. Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) Tansley Review No. 34. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119:345-360.
83. Ward EJ, Bell DM, Clark JS, Oren R (2013). Hydraulic time constants for transpiration of loblolly pine at a free-air carbon dioxide enrichment site. Tree Physiology 33:123-134.
84. Waring RH, Schroeder PE, Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can J For Res 12:556-560. (Pubitemid 13285269)
85. 2 enhances leaf senescence during extreme drought in a temperate forest. Tree Physiol 31:117-130.
86. Warton D, Ormerod J (2007) smatr: (Standardised) major axis estimation and testing routines. R package version 2.1.
87. Whitehead D (1998) Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiol 18:633-644. (Pubitemid 28398054)
88. Whitehead D, Jarvis PG (1981) Coniferous forests and plantations. In: Kozlowski TT (ed.) Water deficits and plant growth. Academic Press, London, pp 49-152.
89. Whitehead D, Teskey RO (1995) Dynamic response of stomata to changing irradiance in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 15:245-251.
90. Whitehead D, Edwards WRN, Jarvis PG (1984) Conducting sapwood area, foliage area, and permeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Can J For Res 14:940-947. (Pubitemid 16275310)
91. 2 enrichment of four tree species. J Exp Bot 48:2095-2095.
92. Woodward FI (1990) Global change: translating plant ecophysiological responses to ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 5:308-311. (Pubitemid 120036314)
93. Wullschleger SD, Meinzer FC, Vertessy RA et al. (1998) A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiol 18:499-512. (Pubitemid 28402857)
94. 2 concentration - interacting variables and perspectives of scale. New Phytol 153:485-496. (Pubitemid 34196722)
95. Wullschleger SD, Childs KW, King AW, Hanson PJ (2011) A model of heat transfer in sapwood and implications for sap flux density measurements using thermal dissipation probes. Tree Physiol 31:669-679.
96. 2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant Soil 151:105-117. (Pubitemid 24394385)