Effect of irradiance and vapour pressure deficit on stomatal response to CO2 enrichment of four tree species

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 48, Issue 317, 1997, Pages 2095-2102

  Will, Rodney E ^a   Teskey, Robert O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CO2 enrichment; Irradiance; Stomatal conductance; Vapour pressure deficit

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031464689     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/48.12.2095     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 2 assimilation to changes in irradiance: laboratory and field data and a model for beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 639-45.
2. 2 enrichment. Journal of Experimental Botany 45, 539-46.
3. Bunce JA. 1993. Effects of doubled atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on the responses of assimilation and conductance to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 189-97.
4. 2 enrichment, phosphorous deficiency and water stress on the growth, conductance and water use of Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 91-8.
5. Curtis PS. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 127-37.
6. Curtis PS, Teeri JA. 1992. Seasonal responses of leaf gas exchange to elevated carbon dioxide in Populus grandidentata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22, 1320-5.
7. 2 and temperatures with water use efficiency. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 843-52.
8. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 104, 139-46.
9. 2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 1214-25.
10. 2 concentration and the carbon exchange rates of saplings of Pinus taeda L. and Liquidambar styraciflua L. Tree Physiology 4, 255-62.
11. 2 concentration in seedlings of three tree species. Tree Physiology 3, 193-202.
12. 2 concentrations in mature loblolly pine trees. Tree Physiology 15, 351-9.
13. 2. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR, eds. Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, 229-52.
14. 4 grass species. Plant Physiology 71, 789-96.
15. Morison JIL, Jarvis PJ. 1983. Direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. II. In Commelina communis L. Plant, Cell and Environment 6, 103-9.
16. Ögren E, Sundin U. 1996. Photosynthetic responses of variable light: a comparison of species from contrasting habitats. Oecologia 106, 18-27.
17. 2 concentration in leaves. In: Enoch HZ, Kimball BA, eds. Carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouse crops, Vol II. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc., 87-102.
18. SAS Institute Inc. 1987. SAS user's guide: version 6. SAS Institute Inc., Box 8000, Cary, NC.
19. Sharkey TD, Raschke K. 1981. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiology 68, 33-40.
20. 2 concentrations. Tree Physiology 2, 243-59.
21. 2. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 1188-94.
22. Teskey RO, Shrestha RB. 1985. A relationship between carbon dioxide, photosynthetic efficiency and shade tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 63, 126-32.
23. 2. Tree Physiology 14, 947-60.
24. 2 enrichment and water stress on gas exchange of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus taeda seedlings grown under different irradiance levels. Oecologia 65, 166-72.
25. Whitehead D, Teskey RO. 1995. Dynamic response of stomata to changing irradiance in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiology 15, 245-51.
26. Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. 1978. Leaf conductance in relation to assimilation in Eucalyptus panciflora Seib. ex Spreng. Plant Physiology 62, 670-4.
27. 2 concentration on stomatal density. New Phytologist 131, 311-27.