Optimization of continuous hydrogen production from co-fermenting molasses with liquid swine manure in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 136, Issue , 2013, Pages 351-359

  Wu, Xiao ^a   Lin, Hongjian ^a   Zhu, Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrogen production rate; Hydrogen yield; Liquid swine manure; Response surface methodology; System optimization

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; MANURES; MOLASSES; OPTIMIZATION;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION RATE; HYDROGEN YIELDS; LIQUID SWINE MANURE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SYSTEM OPTIMIZATIONS;

LIQUIDS;

HYDROGEN; MOLASSES; SUGAR;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN; MANURE; MOLASSE; OPTIMIZATION; PH; PIG;

ANAEROBIC SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; ARTICLE; BATCH REACTOR; FERMENTATION; MANURE; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; SUIDAE;

EID: 84876327411     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.109     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. APHA, Lenore S.C., Greenberg A.E., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
2. Box G., Wilson K. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1951, 13:1-45.
3. Box G.E.P., Hunter W.G., Hunter J.S. Statistics for Experimenters 1968, Wiley, New York, (Chaper 15).
4. Fang H.H.P., Li C.L., Zhang T. Acidophilic biohydrogen production from rice slurry. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:683-692.
5. Ferchichi M., Crabbe E., Hintz W., Gil G.-H., Almadidy A. Influence of culture parameters on biological hydrogen production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum ATCC 27021. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21:855-862.
6. Forsberg C.W. Future hydrogen markets for large-scale hydrogen production systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:431-439.
7. Gilroyed B.H., Li C.L., Hao X.Y., Chu A., McAllister T.A. Biohydrogen production from specified risk materials co-digested with cattle manure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:1099-1105.
8. Hallenbeck P.C., Ghosh D. Advances in fermentative biohydrogen production: the way forward?. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27:287-297.
9. Ismail I., Hassan M.A., Abdul Rahman N.A., Soon C.S. Thermophilic biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed culture. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:42-47.
10. Jung K.-W., Kim D.-H., Kim S.-H., Shin H.-S. Bioreactor design for continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8612-8620.
11. Karlsson A., Vallin L., Ejlertsson J. Effects of temperature, hydraulic retention time and hydrogen extraction rate on hydrogen production from the fermentation of food industry residues and manure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:953-962.
12. Keskin T., Hallenbeck P.C. Hydrogen production from sugar industry wastes using single-stage photofermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112:131-136.
13. Khanal S.K., Chen W.H., Li L., Sung S.W. Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2004, 29:1123-1131.
14. Lateef S.A., Beneragama N., Yamashiro T., Iwasaki M., Ying C., Umetsu K. Biohydrogen production from co-digestion of cow manure and waste milk under thermophilic temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110:251-257.
15. Li Y.C., Zhu J., Wu X.A., Miller C., Wang L.A. The effect of pH on continuous biohydrogen production from swine wastewater supplemented with glucose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162:1286-1296.
16. Lin C.Y., Chang R.C. Hydrogen production during the anaerobic acidogenic conversion of glucose. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1999, 74:498-500.
17. Lin C.Y., Cheng C.H. Fermentative hydrogen production from xylose using anaerobic mixed microflora. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:832-840.
18. Liu D.W., Zeng R.J., Angelidaki I. Effects of pH and hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production versus methanogenesis during anaerobic fermentation of organic household solid waste under extreme-thermophilic temperature (70°C). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100:1108-1114.
19. Liu Q., Zhang X.L., Zhou Y.M., Zhao A.H., Chen S.P., Qian G.R., Xu Z.P. Optimization of fermentative biohydrogen production by response surface methodology using fresh leachate as nutrient supplement. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8661-8668.
20. Mu Y., Zheng X.J., Yu H.Q. Determining optimum conditions for hydrogen production from glucose by an anaerobic culture using response surface methodology (RSM). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7959-7963.
21. Oh Y.K., Raj S.M., Jung G.Y., Park S. Current status of the metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biohydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8357-8367.
22. Perera K.R.J., Nirmalakhandan N. Evaluation of dairy cattle manure as a supplement to improve net energy gain in fermentative hydrogen production from sucrose. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8688-8695.
23. Tawfik A., El-Qelish M. Continuous hydrogen production from co-digestion of municipal food waste and kitchen wastewater in mesophilic anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:270-274.
24. Tenca A., Schievano A., Perazzolo F., Adani F., Oberti R. Biohydrogen from thermophilic co-fermentation of swine manure with fruit and vegetable waste: maximizing stable production without pH control. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8582-8588.
25. Vaccari G., Tamburini E., Sgualdino G., Urbaniec K., Klemes J. Overview of the environmental problems in beet sugar processing: possible solutions. J. Cleaner Prod. 2005, 13:499-507.
26. 2 production from organic waste: mesophilic versus thermophilic regime. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30:1383-1391.
27. Van Ginkel S., Sung S.W., Lay J.J. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:4726-4730.
28. Venetsaneas N., Antonopoulou G., Stamatelatou K., Kornaros M., Lyberatos G. Using cheese whey for hydrogen and methane generation in a two-stage continuous process with alternative pH controlling approaches. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3713-3717.
29. Wu X., Yao W., Zhu J. Effect of pH on continuous biohydrogen production from liquid swine manure with glucose supplement using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:6592-6599.
30. Wu X., Zhu J., Dong C.Y., Miller C., Li Y.C., Wang L., Yao W.Y. Continuous biohydrogen production from liquid swine manure supplemented with glucose using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:6636-6645.
31. Xing Y., Fan S.Q., Zhang J.N., Fan Y.T., Hou H.W. Enhanced bio-hydrogen production from corn stalk by anaerobic fermentation using response surface methodology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:12770-12779.
32. Yokoi H., Maki R., Hirose J., Hayashi S. Microbial production of hydrogen from starch-manufacturing wastes. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 22:389-395.
33. Yokoyama H., Yamashita T., Ogino A., Ishida M., Tanaka Y. Hydrogen fermentation of cow manure mixed with food waste. Jarq-Japan Agric. Res. Q. 2010, 44:399-404.
34. Zhang T., Liu H., Fang H.H.P. Biohydrogen production from starch in wastewater under thermophilic condition. J. Environ. Manage. 2003, 69:149-156.
35. Zhu J., Li Y., Wu X., Miller C., Chen P., Ruan R. Swine manure fermentation for hydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5472-5477.