Evaluation of dairy cattle manure as a supplement to improve net energy gain in fermentative hydrogen production from sucrose

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 8688-8695

  Perera, Karnayakage Rasika J ^a   Nirmalakhandan, Nagamany ^a  

^a New Mexico State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biohydrogen production; Dark fermentation; Dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion; Dark fermentation and microbial fuel cell; Net energy gain

Indexed keywords

BIO-HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; CO-SUBSTRATE; DAIRY CATTLE MANURE; DARK FERMENTATION; DARK FERMENTATION AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; FERMENTATIVE BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION; FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN YIELDS; MESOPHILIC TEMPERATURE; NET ENERGY; NONTHERMAL; NUTRIENT SOURCES; PH LEVELS; PRE-TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; FERMENTATION; FUEL CELLS; HYDROGEN; MANURES; MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS; NUTRIENTS; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

HYDROGEN; SUCROSE;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS POWER; BUFFERING; CATTLE; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN; MANURE; PH; SUCROSE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; DAIRY CATTLE; ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; FERMENTATION; MANURE; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMAL ANALYSIS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BUFFERS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DARKNESS; ELECTRICITY; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MANURE; SUCROSE; THERMODYNAMICS;

BOS;

EID: 80051682757     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.044     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Chen C.Y., Yang M.H., Yeh K.L., Liu C.H., Chang J.S. Biohydrogen production using sequential two-stage dark and photo fermentation processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:4755-4762.
2. Chen C., Lin C. Using sucrose as a substrate in an anaerobic hydrogen-producing reactor. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7:695-699.
3. Das D., Veziroglu T.N. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 2:13-28.
4. Das D. Advances in biohydrogen production processes: an approach towards commercialization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7349-7357.
5. Ezeji T.C., Qureshi N., Blaschek H.P. Acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) production from concentrated substrate: reduction in substrate inhibition by fed-batch technique reduction in substrate inhibition by fed-batch technique. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 63:653-658.
6. Gadhamshetty V., Johnson D.C., Nirmalakhandan N., Smith G.B., Deng S. Feasibility of biohydrogen production at low temperatures in unbuffered reactors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:1233-1243.
7. Gilroyed B.H., Chang C., Chu A., Hao X. Effect of temperature on anaerobic fermentative hydrogen gas production from feedlot cattle manure using mixed microflora. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:4301-4308.
8. Hallenbeck P.C. Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7379-7389.
9. Hills D. Methane gas production from dairy manure at high solids concentration. Trans. ASAE 1980, 23(1):122-126.
10. Hwang M.H., Jang N.J., Hyun S.H., Kim I.S. Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 11:297-309.
11. Kawagoshi Y., Hino N., Fujimoto A., Nakao M., Fujita Y., Sugimura S., Kurukawa K. Effect of inoculum conditioning on hydrogen fermentation and pH effect on bacterial community relevant to hydrogen production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100(5):524-530.
12. Kim S.H., Han S.K., Shin H.S. Effect of substrate concentration on hydrogen production and 16S rDNA-based analysis of the microbial community in a continuous fermenter. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:199-207.
13. Kim D.H., Han S.K., Kim S.H., Shin S.H. Effect of gas sparging on continuous fermentative hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:2158-2169.
14. Kyazze G., Perez N.M., Dinsdale R., Premier G.C., Premier F.R., Guwy A.J., Hawkes D.L. Influence of substrate concentration on the stability and yield of continuous biohydrogen production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93(5):971-979.
15. Lin C.Y., Jo C.H. Hydrogen production from sucrose using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor process. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2003, 78:678-684.
16. Mu Y., Zheng X.J., Yu H.Q., Zhu R.F. Biological hydrogen production by anaerobic sludge at various temperatures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:780-785.
17. Nath K., Das D. Improvement of fermentative hydrogen production: various approaches. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65:520-529.
18. Nath K., Kumar A., Das D. Effect of some environmental parameters on fermentative hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae DM11. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52(6):525-532.
19. Nayyeri M., Kianmehr M., Arabhosseini A., Hassan-Beygi S. Thermal properties of dairy cattle manure. Int. Agrophysics 2009, 23:359-366.
20. Oh S.E., Logan B.E. Hydrogen and electricity production from a food processing wastewater using fermentation and microbial fuel cell technologies. Water Res. 2005, 39:4673-4682.
21. Oh S.E., Van Ginkel S., Logan B.E. The relavative effectiveness of pH control and heat treatment for enhancing biohydrogen gas production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5186-5190.
22. Ong H.K., Pullammanappallil P.C., Greenfield P.F. Physical chemical and biomethanation characteristics of stratified cattle manure slury. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13(11):1593-1597.
23. Perera K.R.J., Nirmalakhandan N. Enhancing fermentative hydrogen production from sucrose. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9137-9143.
24. Perera K.R.J., Ketheesan B., Gadhamshetty V., Nirmalakhandan N. Fermentative biohydrogen production: evaluation of net energy gain. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35(22):12224-12233.
25. Rittman B. Microbial ecology to manage processes in environmental biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24(6):261-266.
26. Robbins J.E., Arnold M.T., Lacher S.L. Methane production from cattle manure waste and delignified straw. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 38(1):175-177.
27. Skonieczny M.T., Yargeau V. Biohydrogen production from wastewater by Clostridium beijerinckii: effect of pH and substrate concentration. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:3288-3294.
28. Speece R. Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters 1996, Archae Press, Tennessee.
29. Su H., Cheng J., Zhou J., Song W., Cen K. Improving hydrogen production from cassava starch by combination of dark and photo fermentation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34(4):1780-1786.
30. Van Ginkel S., Sung S., Lay J.J. Biohydrogen Production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35(24):4726-4730.
31. Van Ginkel S., Logan B. Increased biological hydrogen production with reduced organic loading. Water Res. 2005, 39:3819-3826.
32. Venkata Mohan S., Bhaskar Y., Krishna P., Rao N., Babu V., Sarma P. Biohydrogen production from chemical wastewater as substrate by selectively enriched anaerobic mixed consortia: influence of fermentation pH and substrate composition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:2286-2295.
33. Wang B., Wan W., Wang J. Inhibitory effect of ethanol, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid on fermentative hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:7013-7019.
34. Wang J., Wan W. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:799-811.
35. Xie B., Cheng J., Zhou J., Song W., Cen K. Cogeneration of hydrogen and methane from glucose to improve energy conversion efficiency. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:5006-5011.
36. Xie B., Cheng J., Zhou J., Song W., Liu J., Cen K. Production of hydrogen and methane from potatoes by two-phase anaerobic fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(13):5942-5946.