The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity states on conformity and groupthink in online communities: A Wikipedia study

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1001-1015

  Tsikerdekis, Michail ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; PERCEIVED ANONYMITIES; PROBLEM RESOLUTION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERS; WIKIPEDIA;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; WEBSITES;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876286748     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22795     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Ahlfinger, N.R., &, Esser, J.K., (2001). Testing the groupthink model: Effects of promotional leadership and conformity predisposition. Social Behavior and Personality, 29 (1), 31-41. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2001.29.1.31
2. Allen, V.L., (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In, L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60105-7
3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Lamdan, N., Madiel, R., &, Hayat, T., (2008). Personality characteristics of Wikipedia members. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11 (6), 679-681. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0225
4. Asch, S.E., (1958). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In, E.E. Macoby, T.M. Newcomb, &, E.L. Hartley, (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 174-183). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
5. Asch, S.E., (1992). Opinions and social pressure. In, E. Aronson, (Ed.), Readings about the social animal (6th ed., pp. 13-22). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
6. Baron, R.S., Vandello, J.A., &, Brunsman, B., (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (5), 915-927. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915
7. Bond, R., &, Smith, P.B., (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 111-137. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.119.1.111
8. Bryman, A., (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9. Chao, J., (2007). Student project collaboration using Wikis. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education Training (CSEET07) (pp. 255-261). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi: 10.1109/CSEET.2007.49
10. Chen, C-K., Tsai, C-H., &, Shu, K-C., (2009). An exploratory study for groupthink research to enhance group decision quality. Journal of Quality, 16 (2), 137-152. Retrieved from http://joq.im.ncue.edu.tw/Table-of-Contents/ fullpaper/200904/05.pdf
11. Cialdini, R.B., &, Goldstein, N.J., (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (1), 591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
12. Cinnirella, M., &, Green, B., (2007). Does "cyber- conformity" vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (4), 2011-2025. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.009
13. Cline, R., (1990). Detecting groupthink: Methods for observing the illusion of unanimity. Communication Quarterly, 38 (2), 112-126. doi: 10.1080/01463379009369748
14. Diener, E., (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In, P.B. Paulus, (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 1160-1171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Diener, E., Fraser, S.C., Beaman, A.L., &, Kelem, R.T., (1976). Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 (2), 178-183. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.2.178
16. Duffy, P., &, Bruns, A., (2006). The use of blogs, Wikis and RSS in education: A conversation of possibilities. In Proceedings Online Learning and Teaching Conference 2006 (pp. 31-38). Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
17. Esser, J., (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73 (2/3), 116-141. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758
18. Farkas, C., Ziegler, G., Meretei, A., &, Lörincz, A., (2002). Anonymity and accountability in self-organizing electronic communities. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (pp. 81-90). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/644527.644536
19. Friend, R., Rafferty, Y., &, Bramel, D., (1990). A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch "conformity" study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 29-44. Retrieved from http://webpage.pace.edu/yrafferty/ Yvonne/AschConformityStudy.pdf
20. Gavish, B., &, Gerdes, J.H., (1998). Anonymous mechanisms in group decision support systems communication. Decision Support Systems, 23 (4), 297-328. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00057-8
21. Glott, R., Schmidt, P., &, Ghosh, R., (2010). Wikipedia survey-overview of results (Technical Report, pp. 1-11). United Nations University MERIT. Retrieved from http://www.wikipediasurvey.org/docs/Wikipedia- Overview-15March2010-FINAL.pdf
22. Hart, P., (1991). Irving L. Janis' victims of groupthink. Political Psychology, 12 (2), 247-278. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791464
23. Hart, P., (1998). Preventing groupthink revisited: Evaluating and reforming groups in government. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73 (2/3), 306-326. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2764
24. Henningsen, D.D., Henningsen, M.L.M., Eden, J., &, Cruz, M.G., (2006). Examining the Symptoms of groupthink and retrospective sensemaking. Small Group Research, 37 (1), 36-64. doi: 10.1177/1046496405281772
25. Hiltz, S.R., &, Turoff, M., (2002). What makes learning networks effective? Communications of the ACM, 45 (4), 56-59. doi: 10.1145/505248.505273
26. Hiltz, S.R., Turoff, M., &, Johnson, K., (1989). Experiments in group decision making. 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5 (2), 217-232. doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90008-0
27. Hornsey, M.J., Majkut, L., Terry, D.J., &, McKimmie, B.M., (2003). On being loud and proud: Non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42 (3), 319-335. doi: 10.1348/ 014466603322438189
28. Humphrey, W.S., (1989). The software engineering process: Definition and scope. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 14 (4), 82-83. doi: 10.1145/75111.75122
29. Janis, I.L., (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Janis, I.L., (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Janis, I.L., &, Mann, L., (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
32. Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T., &, Galegher, J., (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14 (3), 313-321. doi: 10.2307/248893
33. Kane, G.C., (2011). A multimethod study of information quality in wiki collaboration. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2 (1), 1-16. doi: 10.1145/1929916.1929920
34. Kaplan, A.M., &, Haenlein, M., (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53 (1), 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
35. Khosrowpour, M., (2008). Innovative technologies for information resources management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.
36. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., &, McGuire, T.W., (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123-1134. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
37. Kiesler, S., &, Sproull, L., (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52 (1), 96-123. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-B
38. Kim, B., &, Han, I., (2009). The role of trust belief and its antecedents in a community-driven knowledge environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (5), 1012-1026. doi: 10.1002/asi
39. Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B.A., Suh, B., &, Mytkowicz, T., (2008). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In Alt.CHI at 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007) (pp. 1-9). New York: ACM Press.
40. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., &, Chi, E.H., (2007). He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 453-462). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240698
41. Kroon, M.B.R., Hart, P., &, Van Kreveld, D., (1991). Managing group decision making processes: Individual versus collective accountability and groupthink. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2 (2), 91-115. doi: 10.1108/eb022695
42. Laporte, L., Van Nimwegen, C., &, Uyttendaele, A.J., (2010). Do people say what they think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social presence. In NordiCHI '10 Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 305-314). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1868914.1868951
43. Lea, M., &, Spears, R., (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34 (2), 283-301. doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90045-9
44. Lea, M., &, Spears, R., (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2 (3-4), 321-341. doi: 10.1080/10919399209540190
45. Lea, M., Spears, R., Watt, S.E., Rogers, P., &, Reicher, S., (2000). The InSIDE story: Social psychological processes affecting on-line groups. In, M. Lea, R. Spears, S.E. Watt, P. Rogers, &, S. Reicher, (Eds.), SIDE-issues centre-stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups (pp. 47-62). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KNAW.
46. Lea, M., Spears, R., &, de Groot, D., (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (5), 526-537. doi: 10.1177/0146167201275002
47. Lee, E.-J., &, Nass, C., (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28 (3), 349-381. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002. tb00812.x
48. Leuf, B., &, Cunningham, W., (2001). The Wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
49. Levine, J.M., (1999). Solomon Asch's legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3 (4), 358-364. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0304-5
50. Lewin, C., (2005). Understanding and describing quantitative data. In, B. Somekh, &, C. Lewin, (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 220-230). London, England: Sage.
51. Lim, S., (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (11), 2189-2202. doi: 10.1002/asi.21142
52. Marsden, P.V., &, Wright, J.D., (2010). Handbook of survey research. Bingley, England: Emerald.
53. McCauley, C., (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (2), 250-260. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.250
54. McCauley, C., (1998). Group dynamics in Janis's theory of groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73 (2-3), 142-162. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2759
55. McLeod, P.L., Baron, R.S., Marti, M.W., &, Yoon, K., (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (5), 706-718. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.706
56. Miranda, S.M., (1994). Avoidance of groupthink: Meeting management using group support systems. Small Group Research, 25 (1), 105-136. doi: 10.1177/1046496494251007
57. Miranda, S.M., &, Saunders, C., (1995). Group support systems: An organization development intervention to combat groupthink. Public Administration Quarterly, 19 (2), 193-216.
58. Nov, O., (2007). What motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50 (11), 60-64. doi: 10.1145/1297797.1297798
59. Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., &, Terveen, L., (2009). Wikipedians are born, not made: A study of power editors on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Vol. 27, pp. 51-60). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1531674.1531682
60. Papadakis, M.C., (2003). People can create a sense of community in cyberspace issue brief. Retrieved from http://www.sri.com/policy/csted/reports/ sandt/it/Papadakis-IT-virtual-communities-issue-brief.pdf
61. Park, W.-W., (2000). A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21 (8), 873-887. doi: 10.1002/1099-1379(200012)21:8<873::AID- JOB56>3.0.CO;2-8
62. Pfitzmann, A., &, Hansen, M., (2010). A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: Anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, unobservability, pseudonymity, and identity management. Retrieved from http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/literatur/Anon-Terminology-v0.34.pdf
63. Pinsonneault, A., &, Heppel, N., (1997). Anonymity in group support systems research: New conceptualization and measure. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 134-145). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
64. Pinsonneault, A., &, Heppel, N., (1998). Anonymity in group support systems research: New conceptualization and measure. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 134-145). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.1997. 665469
65. Postmes, T., &, Lea, M., (2000). Social processes and group decision making: Anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics, 43 (8), 1252-1274. doi: 10.1080/00140130050084978
66. Postmes, T., Spears, R., &, Lea, M., (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-Effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25 (6), 689-715. doi: 10.1177/009365098025006006
67. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., &, De Groot, D., (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (1), 1243-1254. doi: 10.1177/01461672012710001
68. Prentice-Dunn, S., &, Rogers, R.W., (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (3), 503-513. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.503
69. Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S.T.K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., &, Riedl, J., (2007). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 07) (p. 259). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1316624. 1316663
70. Rains, S.A., (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34 (1), 100-125. doi: 10.1177/0093650206296084
71. Reicher, S.D., Spears, R., &, Postmes, T., (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6 (1), 161-198. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000049
72. Reysen, M.B., (2003). The effects of social pressure on group recall. Memory & Cognition, 31 (8), 1163-1168. doi: 10.3758/BF03195799
73. Rosander, M., &, Eriksson, O., (2012). Conformity on the Internet-The role of task difficulty and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023
74. Rose, J.D., (2011). Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory-a literary review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4 (1), 37-57. Retrieved from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/elj/vol4iss1/Rose-V4I1-pp37-57. pdf
75. Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S.A., Duda, J.L., &, Lintunen, T., (2009). Can high group cohesion be harmful? A case study of a junior ice-hockey team. Small Group Research, 40 (4), 421-435. doi: 10.1177/1046496409334359
76. Sheehan, K.B., (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (2). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
77. Smilowitz, M., Compton, D.C., &, Flint, L., (1988). The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of ASCH's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 4 (4), 311-321. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0747563288900039
78. Somekh, B., &, Lewin, C., (2005). Research methods in the social sciences. London, England: Sage. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00515-7.x
79. Spears, R., &, Lea, M., (1994). Panacea or panopticon?: The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21 (4), 427-459. doi: 10.1177/009365094021004001
80. Spears, R., Lea, M., Postmes, T., &, Wolbert, A., (2011). A SIDE look at computer-mediated interaction. In, Z. Birchmeier, B. Dietz-Uhler, &, G. Stasser, (Eds.), Strategic uses of social technology: An interactive perspective of social psychology (pp. 16-39). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
81. Tsikerdekis, M., (2011). Engineering anonymity to reduce aggression online. In, K. Blashki, (Ed.), IADIS International Conference-Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction (pp. 463-467). IADIS.
82. Tsikerdekis, M., (2012). The choice of complete anonymity versus pseudonymity for aggression online. eMinds International Journal on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (8), 35-57. Retrieved from http://www.eminds. uniovi.es/index.php?journal=eminds&page=article&op=viewFile& path%5B%5D=106&path%5B%5D=67
83. Turner, J.C., (1988). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
84. Wallace, P.M., (2001). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
85. West, J.A., &, West, M.L., (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration: The power of the read-write web. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
86. Wikipedia. (2012a). About. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia:About
87. Wikipedia. (2012b). Special: Statistics. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
88. Wikipedia. (2012c). Research: Committee. Retrieved from http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee
89. Zimbardo, P.G., (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In, W.J. Arnold, &, D. Levine, (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
90. Zimbardo, P.G., (2008). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.