Effectiveness of a computer-tailored print-based physical activity intervention among French Canadians with type 2 diabetes in a real-life setting

Health Education Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 573-585

  Boudreau, Franois ^a   Godin, Gaston ^b   Poirier, Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; CANADA; COMPUTERS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 79960762006     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Harris SB, Ekoé J-M, Zdanowicz Y et al. Glycemic control and morbidity in the Canadian primary care setting (results of the diabetes in Canada evaluation study). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 70: 90-7. (Pubitemid 41207652)
2. Public Health Agency of Canada. Building a National Diabetes Strategy: Synthesis of Research and Collaborations-Consultation Findings vol. 1. Ottawa, Canada: Government of Canada, 2005, 1-82.
3. Gornall A, Lévesque L, Sigal RJ. A pilot study of physical activity education delivery in diabetes education centres in Ontario. Can J Diabetes 2008; 32: 123-30. (Pubitemid 351883877)
4. de Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 99-105. (Pubitemid 29078650)
5. van Assema P, Ronda G, Steenbakkers Met al. The reach of a computer-tailored nutrition education program in the Dutch heart health community intervention "Hartslag Limburg". J Nutr Educ Behav 2006; 38: 293-7. (Pubitemid 44333051)
6. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-93.
7. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol 2008; 57: 1-29.
8. Boudreau F, Godin G. Understanding physical activity intentions among French Canadians with type 2 diabetes: an extension of Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009; 6: 35-46.
9. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
10. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1996; 28: 1-11. (Pubitemid 126416697)
11. Godin G, Jobin J, Bouillon J. Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. Can J Public Health 1986; 77: 359-62.
12. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985; 10: 141-46.
13. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P et al. Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 249-56. (Pubitemid 29184927)
14. Oenema A, Brug J. Feedback strategies to raise awareness of personal dietary intake: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2003; 36: 429-39. (Pubitemid 36315795)
15. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
16. Heritier SR, Gebski VJ, Keech AC. Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle. Med J Aust 2003; 179: 438-40. (Pubitemid 37328013)
17. Smeets T, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 402-13. (Pubitemid 351786606)
18. Boulé NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP et al. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001; 286: 1218-27. (Pubitemid 33015552)
19. Luszczynska A. An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planning strategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 900-8. (Pubitemid 43087365)
20. Scholz U, Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R. Predicting physical exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: the role of phase-specific self-efficacy beliefs. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2005; 27: 135-51. (Pubitemid 40937732)
21. Dijkstra A. Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 527-39. (Pubitemid 41219879)
22. Jacobs DR, Jr, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 81-91. (Pubitemid 23027686)
23. Le Grande MR, Elliott PC, Worcester MU et al. An evaluation of self-report physical activity instruments used in studies involving cardiac patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2008; 28: 358-69.
24. Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW et al. A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: S1-205.
25. Smeets T, Kremers SPJ, de Vries H et al. Effects of tailored feedback on multiple health behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2007; 33: 117-23. (Pubitemid 47289489)
26. van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN et al. Efficacy of two tailored interventions promoting physical activity in older adults. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37: 405-17.
27. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys, 2nd edn. NJ: John Wiley, 2007.
28. Institut de la statistique du Québec. Québec Handy Numbers, 2007 Edition. Québec city, Canada: Gouvernement du Québec, 2007.
29. Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat A. Computer-tailored physical activity behavior change interventions targeting adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009; 6: 30-42.