Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting

Information and Management

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 521-532

  Kolekofski Jr , Keith E ^a   Heminger, Alan R ^a  

^a AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Information ownership; Information sharing; Information stewardship; Organizational information; Theory of reasoned action (TRA)

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SHARING;

COMPETITION; DATA PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037411191     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00068-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baroudi J.J., Orlikowski W.J. A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: a psychometric evaluation and notes on use. Journal of Management Information Systems. 4:1998;44-59.
2. Brief A.P., Motowidlo S.J. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review. 11:1986;710-725.
3. Constant D.et al. What's mine is ours, or is it? a study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research. 5:1994;400-421.
4. R.F. DeVellis, Scale Development: Theory and Application, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
5. English L.P. Accountability to the rescue. Database Programming and Design. 6:1993;54-59.
6. English L.P. Redefining information management: IM as an effective business enabler. Information Systems Management. 13:1996;65-67.
7. Epstein B.J., King W.R. An experimental study of the value of information. Omega. 10:1982;249-258.
8. M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
9. H.H. Kelley, J.W. Thibaut, Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, Wiley, New York, 1978.
10. Laughlin P.R.et al. Generality of a theory of collective induction: face-to-face and computer-mediated interaction, amount of potential information, and group versus member choice of evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63:1995;98-111.
11. E.W. Martin et al., Managing Information Technology: What Managers Need to Know, Macmillan, New York, 1991.
12. Nolan R.L. Computer data bases: the future is now. Harvard Business Review. 51:1973;98-114.
13. O'Reilly C.A. III. Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: the impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal. 25:1982;756-771.
14. O'Reilly C. III., Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effect of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 71:1986;492-499.
15. T.W.M. Plant, Whose Information is it Anyway? An Argument for Information Stewardship, MS Thesis, AFIT/GIR/LAR/96D-6 (AD-A319650), School of Logistics and Acquisition Management, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, December 1996.
16. Sullivan-Trainor M. Sharing the wealth: data becomes community property. Computerworld. 23:1989;71-76.
17. Weenig M.W.H., Midden C.J.H. Communication network influences on information diffusion and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61:1991;734-742.
18. Weldon J.-L. Who owns the data? Data Management. 3:1986;54-57.
19. Zmud R.W. An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sciences. 9:1978;187-195.