Catalyst Immobilization Strategy: Some General Considerations and a Comparison of the Main Features of Different Supports

Recoverable and Recyclable Catalysts

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 427-461

  Cozzi, Franco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

'catalyst immobilization' simplest approach to catalyst recovery and recycling; Catalyst immobilization general considerations; Catalyst immobilization strategy; Catalyst's stereoselectivity and frequent victim of immobilization; Degree of functionalization in determining choice of support for catalyst immobilization; Different supports employed for proline immobilization; High catalytic efficiency prerequisite condition in catalyst immobilization; Immobilization and prerequisite conditions; Proline supported on inorganic supports and layered double hydroxides (LDH); Supported proline containing peptidic catalysts

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875872309     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470682005.ch15     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. K. A. Ahrendt, C. J. Borths and D.W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 4243-4244 (2000).
2. A. Berkessel and H. Groger, Asymmetric Organic Catalysis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
3. M. Benaglia, G. Celentano, M. Cinquini, A. Puglisi and F. Cozzi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 344, 149-152 (2002).
4. S. A. Selkälä, J. Tois, P. M. Pihko and A. M. P.Koskinen, Adv. Synth. Catal., 344, 941-945 (2002).
5. M. Benaglia, G. Celentano, M. Cinquini, A. Puglisi and F. Cozzi, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 567-573 (2004).
6. W. S. Sen, J. J. M.Wiemer and D.W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 9874-9875 (2000).
7. For a review on the general problem of reactant accessibility within a polymeric support, see: P. Hodge, Chem. Soc. Rev., 26, 417-424 (1997).
8. To circumvent this problem the insertion of a spacer separating the catalyst from the support has been proposed. For pioneering results see: H. Molinari, F. Montanari, S. Quici and P. Tundo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 3920-3927 (1979).
9. For a discussion on the influence of the spacer on catalyst reactivity see: P. L. Anelli, B. Czech, F. Montanari and S. Quici, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 861-869 (1984), and references cited therein.
10. R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and G.Tocco, Org. Lett., 2, 1737-1739 (2000).
11. See also: K. Shibatomi, T. Nakahashi and Y. Uozumi, Synlett, 1643-1645 (2000).
12. J. D. Bass, A. Solovyov, A. J. Pascal and A. Katz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 3737-3747 (2006).
13. For a review describing the enhancement of heterogeneous catalysis through cooperative hybrid organic-inorganic interfaces see: J. M. Notenstein and A. Katz, Chem. Eur. J., 12, 3954-3965 (2006).
14. For a review describing the exploitation of nanospace confinement for asymmetric catalysis see: J. M. Thomas and R. Raja, Acc. Chem. Res., 41, 708-720 (2008).
15. B. F. G. Johnson, S. A. Raynor, D. S. Shepard, T. Mashmeyer, J. M. Thomas, G. Sankar, S. Bromley, R. Oldroyd, L. Gladden and M. D. Mantle, Chem. Commun., 1167-1168 (1999).
16. For a recent review see: E. L. Margelefsky, R. K. Zeidan and M. E. Davis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 37, 1118-1126 (2008). This review collects a few examples of cooperative supported bi-functional catalysts reported by the Davis's group.
17. S. Huh, H.-T. Chen, J. W. Wiench, M. Pruski and V. S.-Y. Lin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 1826-1830 (2005).
18. D. J. Gravert and K. D. Janda, Chem. Rev. 97, 489-509 (1997).
19. D. E. Bergbreiter, Chem. Rev. 102, 3345-3383 (2002).
20. D. E. Bergbreiter and C. Li, Org. Lett., 5, 2445-2447 (2003).
21. For a review on continuous flow methods see: G. Jas and A. Kirschning, Chem. Eur. J., 9, 5708-5723 (2003).
22. A. M. Hafez, A. E. Taggi,T. Dudding andT. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 10853-10859 (2001).
23. M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi, A. Puglisi and G. Celentano, Adv. Synth. Catal., 344, 533-542 (2002).
24. For an excellent review on supported proline and proline derivatives as catalyst see: M. Gruttadauria, F. Giacalone and R. Noto, Chem. Soc. Rev., 37, 1666-1688 (2008).
25. G. Szöllösi, G. London, L. Balaspiri, C. Somlai and M. Bartok, Chirality, 15, S90-S96 (2003).
26. M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and G. Tocco, Tetrahedron Lett., 43, 3391-3393 (2002).
27. For pioneering work demonstrating that an increased loading of active sites does not necessarily result into an increased catalytic activity see: P. L. Anelli, F. Montanari and S. Quici, J. Org. Chem., 51, 4910-4914 (1986).
28. For an excellent review see: C. Gennari and U. Piarulli, Chem. Rev., 103, 3071-3100 (2003).
29. M. S. Sigman and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 4901-4902 (1998).
30. M. S. Sigman, P. Vachal and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 39, 1279-1281 (2000).
31. P. Vachal and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 10012-10014 (2002).
32. T. Danelli, R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and G. Tocco, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 14, 461-467 (2003).
33. For the synthesis of the nonsupported catalyst, see: G. Priem, B. Pelotier, S. J. F. Macdonald, M. S. Anson and I. B. Campbell, J. Org. Chem., 68, 3844-3848 (2003).
34. For that of the supported systems, see: G. Priem, B. Pelotier, S. J. F. Macdonald, M. S. Anson and I. B. Campbell, Synlett, 679-683 (2003).
35. T. Balakrishnan and E. Murugan, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 41, 347-364 (2003).
36. Reviews: B. List, Tetrahedron, 58, 5573-5590 (2002).
37. E. R. Jarvo and S. J. Miller, Tetrahedron, 58, 2481-2495 (2002).
38. W. Notz, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas, Acc. Chem. Res., 37, 580-591 (2004).
39. K. Kondo, T. Yamano and K. Takemoto, Makromol. Chem., 186, 1781-1785 (1985).
40. M. Benaglia, G. Celentano and F. Cozzi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 343, 171-173 (2001).
41. M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi, A. Puglisi and G. Celentano, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 204-205, 157-163 (2003).
42. L. Gu, Y. Wu, Y. Zhang and G. Zhao, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 263, 187-194 (2007).
43. M. Benaglia, A. Puglisi and F. Cozzi, Chem. Rev., 103, 3401-3430 (2003).
44. F. Cozzi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1367-1390 (2006).
45. D. Font, C. Jimeno and M. A. Pericas, Org. Lett., 8, 4653-4655 (2006).
46. D. Font, S. Sayalero, A. Bastero, C. Jimeno and M. A. Pericas, Org. Lett., 10, 337-340 (2008).
47. F. Giacalone, M. Gruttadauria, A. Mossuto Marculescu and R. Noto, Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 255-258 (2007).
48. F. Giacalone, M. Gruttadauria, A. Mossuto Marculescu, S. Riela and R. Noto, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 4688-4695 (2007).
49. Y. X. Liu, Y. N. Sun, H. H. Tan, W. Liu and J. C. Tao, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 18, 2649-2656 (2007).
50. Y. X. Liu, Y. N. Sun, H. H. Tan and J. C. Tao, Catal. Lett., 120, 281-287 (2008).
51. K. Akagawa, S. Sakamoto and K. Kudo, Tetrahedron Lett., 46, 8185-8187 (2005).
52. J. D. Revell, D. Gantenbein, P. Krattiger and H. Wennemers, Biopolymers, 84, 105-113 (2006).
53. W. Miao and T. H. Chan, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1711-1718 (2006).
54. L. Zhou and L. Wang, Chem. Lett., 36, 628-629 (2007).
55. M. Lombardo, F. Pasi, S. Easwar and C. Trombini, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 2061-2065 (2007).
56. D. E. Siyutkin, A. S. Kucherenko, M. I. Struchkova and S. G. Zlotin, Tetrahedron Lett., 49, 1212-1216 (2008).
57. N. Mase, Y. Nakai, N. Ohara, H. Yoda, K. Takabe, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 734-735 (2006).
58. Y. Hayashi, T. Sumiya, J. Takahashi, H. Gotoh, T. Urushima and M. Shoji, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 45, 958-961 (2006).
59. E. Bellis and G. Kokotos, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 241, 166-174 (2005).
60. T. Kehat and M. Portnoy, Chem. Commun., 2823-2825 (2007).
61. Z. Shen, J. Ma, Y. Liu, C. Jiao, M. Li and Y. Zhang, Chirality, 17, 556-558 (2005).
62. K. Liu, D. Haussinger and W.-D. Woggon, Synlett, 2298-2300 (2007).
63. J. Huang, X. Zhang and D. W. Armstrong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 46, 9073-9077 (2007).
64. D. Dhar, I. Eadham and S. Chandrasekaran, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 365-372 (2003).
65. F. Calderon, R. Fernandez, F. Sanchez and A. Fernandez-Mayoralas, Adv. Synth. Catal., 347, 1395-1403 (2005).
66. E. G. Doyaguez, F. Calderon, F. Sanchez and A. Fernandez-Mayoralas, J. Org. Chem., 72, 9353-9356 (2007).
67. G. Chouhan, D. Wang and H. Alper, Chem. Commun., 4809-4811 (2007).
68. Z. An, W. Zhang, H. Shi and J. He, J. Catal., 241, 319-327 (2006).
69. J. S. Johnson and D. A. Evans, Acc. Chem. Res., 33, 325-335 (2000).
70. F. Fache, E. Schulz, M. L. Tommasino and M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev., 100, 2159-2232 (2000).
71. J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, J. A. Mayoral and T. Tarnai, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 8, 2089-2092 (1997).
72. see also: J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, J. A. Mayoral and T. Tarnai, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 9, 3997-4008 (1998).
73. P. J. Alonso, J. M. Fraile, J. Garcia, J. I. Garcia, J. I. Martinez, J. A. Mayoral and M. C. Sanchez, Langmuir, 16, 5607-5612 (2000).
74. D. Rechavi and M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev., 102, 3467-3494 (2002).
75. J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, J. A. Mayoral, T. Tarnai and M. A. Harmer, J. Catal., 186, 214-221 (1999).
76. J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, C. I. Herrerias, J. A. Mayoral, O. Reiser, A. Socuellamos and H.Werner, Chem. Eur. J., 10, 2997-3005 (2004).
77. M. I. Burguete, J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, E. Garcia-Verdugo, C. I. Herrerias, S. V. Luis and J. A. Mayoral, J. Org. Chem., 66, 8893-8901 (2001).
78. A. Cornejo, J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, M. J. Gil, S.V. Luis,V. Martinez-Merino and J. A. Mayoral, J. Org. Chem., 70, 5536-5544 (2005).
79. For recent applications of other metal complexes of Py-Box ligands related to that present in 41, see: M. Tilliet, S. Lundgren, C. Moberg and V. Levacher, Adv. Syn. Catal., 349, 2079-2084 (2007).
80. A. Mandoli, S. Orlandi, D. Pini and P. Salvadori, Chem. Commun., 2466-2467 (2003).
81. M. Glos and O. Reiser, Org. Lett., 2, 2045-2048 (2000).
82. R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and M. Pitillo, J. Org. Chem., 66, 3160-3166 (2001).
83. For examples not included in ref. 60, see: D. Rechavi and M. Lemaire, Org. Lett., 3, 2493-2496 (2001).
84. J. K. Park, S.W. Kim, T. Hyeon and B. M. Kim, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 12, 2931-2935 (2001).
85. A. Lee, W. Kim, J. Lee, T. Hyeon and B. M. Kim, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 15, 2595-2598 (2004).
86. P. O'Leary, N. P. Krosveld, K. P. De Jong, G. van Koten and R. J. M. K. Gebbink, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 3177-3180 (2004).
87. For a zeolite Y-supported Box, see: N. A. Caplan, F. E. Hancock, P. C. Bulman Page and G. J. Hutchings, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 43, 1685-1688 (2004).
88. T. M. Lancaster, S. S. Lee and J. Y. Ying, Chem. Commun., 3577-3579 (2005).
89. J. Lim, S. N. Riduan, S. S. Lee and J. Y. Ying, Adv. Synth. Catal., 350, 1295-1308 (2008).
90. J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcia, C. I. Herrerias and J. A. Mayoral, Chem. Commun., 4669-4671 (2005).
91. For a very recent review proposing a new approach to the development of supports capable of improving the efficiency of a supported catalyst see: N. Madhavan, C. W. Jones and M. Weck, Acc. Chem. Res., 41, 1153-1165 (2008).