The benefits of multimodal information: A meta-analysis comparing visual and visual-tactile feedback

ICMI'06: 8th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Conference Proceeding

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 333-338

  Prewett, Matthew S ^a   Yang, Liuquin ^a   Stilson, Frederick R B ^a   Gray, Ashley A ^a   Coovert, Michael D ^a   Burke, Jennifer ^a   Redden, Elizabeth ^b   Elliot, Linda R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b ARL/HRED at SAIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Multimodal; Visual feedback; Visual tactile feedback

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK CONTROL; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; METADATA; USER INTERFACES; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

MULTIPLE RESOURCE THEORY (MRT); VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL-TACTILE FEEDBACK;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 34547229154     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1180995.1181057     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Wickens, C., (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 2, 159-177.
2. Chiasson, J., McGrath, B., & Rupert, A. (2002). Enhanced situation awareness in sea, air, and land environment. In Proceedings of NATO RTO Human Factors & Medicine Panel Symposium on "Spatial disorientation in military vehicles: Causes, consequences and cures," La Coruña, Spain, No. TRO-MP-086, 1-10.
3. Van Erp, J. & Van Veen, H. (2004). Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F, 247-256.
4. Wilson, D.B. (2001). Effect size determination program. Software.
5. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. O. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
6. Borenstein, M., & Rothstein, H. (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: A computer program for research synthesis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
7. Akamatsu, M., & Sato, S. (1994). A multimodal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(3), 443-453.
8. Cockbum, A., Firth, A. (2003). Improving the acquisition of small targets. In proceedings of the HCI, 181-196.
9. Diamond, D. D., Kass, S. J., Andrasik, F., Raj, A. K., & Rupert, A. H. (2002). Vibrotactile cueing as a master caution system for visual monitoring. Human Factors & Aerospace Safety, 2(4), 339-354.
10. Forster, B., Cavina-Pratesi, C., Aglioti, S. M., & Berlucchi, G. (2002). Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time. Experimental Brain Research, 143(4), 480-487.
11. He, F., & Agah, A. (2001). Multi-modal human interactions with an intelligent interface utilizing images, sounds, and force feedback. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 32(2), 171-190.
12. Hopp, P. J., Smith, C. A. R., Clegg, B. A., & Heggestad, E. D. (2005). Interruption management: The use of attention-directing tactile cues. Human Factors, 47(1), 1-11.
13. Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). Multiple haptic target for motion-impaired computer users. CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 41-48.
14. Lindeman, R. W., Sibert, J. L., Mendez-Mendez, E., Patil, S., & Phifer, D. (2005). Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building-clearing task. CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, 271-280.
15. Lindeman, R. W., Yanagida, Y., Sibert, J. L., & Lavine, R. (2003). Effective vibrotactile cueing in a visual search task. Proceedings of the Ninth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2003), Sept. 1-5, 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 89-96.
16. McGee, M.R. (1999). A haptically enhanced scrollbar: Force-Feedback as a means of reducing the problems associated with scrolling, First PHANTOM Users Research Symposium, May, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.
17. Moorhead, I.R., Holmes, S., & Furnell, A. (2004). Understanding multisensory integration for pilot spatial orientation. QINETIQ/KI/CHS/TR042277.
18. Oakley, I., McGee, M. R., Brewster, S., & Gray, P. (2000). Putting the feel in 'look and feel'. CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands, 415-422.
19. Oakley, I., & O'Modhrain, S. (2005). Tilt to scroll: Evaluating a motion based vibrotactile mobile interface. WHC '05: Proceedings of the 1st joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Pisa, Italy, 40-49.
20. Swindells, C., Unden, A., & Sang, T. (2003). Torque BAR: An ungrounded haptic feedback device. ICMI '03: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 52-59.
21. Tang, H., Beebe, D. J., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Comparison of tactile and visual feedback for a multi-state input mechanism. IEMBS '97: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 4 1697-1700.
22. Unger, B. J., Nicolaidis, A., Berkelman, P. J., Thompson, A., Lederman, S., & Klatzky, R. L. et al. (2002). Virtual peg-inhole performance using a 6-DOF magnetic levitation haptic device: Comparison with real forces and with visual guidance alone. HAPTIC '02: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Orlando, Florida, USA, 263-270.
23. Van Erp, J. B. F., & Verschoor, M. H. (2004). Cross-modal visual and vibrotactile tracking. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 105-112.