Plastic modifications within inhibitory control networks induced by practicing a stop-signal task: An electrical neuroimaging study

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1141-1147

  Manuel, Aurelie L ^a   Bernasconi, Fosco ^a   Spierer, Lucas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

EEG source estimation; Inhibitory control; Learning; Plasticity; Stop signal task

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BASAL GANGLION; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITORY CONTROL; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NETWORK LEARNING; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; BASAL GANGLIA; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE NET; NEUROIMAGING; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875807273     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aron A.R. From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry 2011, 69(12):e55-e68.
2. Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(9):2424-2433.
3. Aron A.R., Fletcher P.C., Bullmore E.T., Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6(2):115-116.
4. Band G.P., van der Molen M.W., Logan G.D. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica Feb 2003, 112(2):105-142.
5. Beauchamp M.H., Dagher A., Aston J.A., Doyon J. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task. NeuroImage 2003, 20(3):1649-1660.
6. Britz J., Michel C.M. State-dependent visual processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:370.
7. Brunet D., Murray M.M., Michel C.M. Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Computational Intelligence Neuroscience 2011, 2011:813-870.
8. Chamberlain S.R., Fineberg N.A., Blackwell A.D., Robbins T.W., Sahakian B.J. Motor inhibition and cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania. American Journal of Psychiatry 2006, 163(7):1282-1284.
9. Chambers C.D., Bellgrove M.A., Stokes M.G., Henderson T.R., Garavan H., Robertson I.H., et al. Executive " brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(3):444-455.
10. Chambers C.D., Garavan H., Bellgrove M.A. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(5):631-646.
11. Chao H.H., Luo X., Chang J.L., Li C.S. Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time-an intra-subject analysis. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10:75.
12. Chikazoe J., Konishi S., Asari T., Jimura K., Miyashita Y. Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(1):69-80.
13. Cohen J.R., Poldrack R.A. Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 2008, 15(1):108-115.
14. Congdon E., Mumford J.A., Cohen J.R., Galvan A., Canli T., Poldrack R.A. Measurement and reliability of response inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:37.
15. Depue B.E., Curran T., Banich M.T. Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process. Science 2007, 317(5835):215-219.
16. Dillon D.G., Pizzagalli D.A. Inhibition of action, thought, and emotion: A selective neurobiological review. Applied and Preventive Psychology 2007, 12(3):99-114.
17. Eagle D.M., Baunez C., Hutcheson D.M., Lehmann O., Shah A.P., Robbins T.W. Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: Role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(1):178-188.
18. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101(2-3):267-291.
19. Fillmore M.T., Rush C.R. Impaired inhibitory control of behavior in chronic cocaine users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2002, 66(3):265-273.
20. Fillmore M.T., Rush C.R., Kelly T.H., Hays L. Triazolam impairs inhibitory control of behavior in humans. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2001, 9(4):363-371.
21. Grave de Peralta M.R., Gonzalez A.S., Lantz G., Michel C.M., Landis T. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topography 2001, 14(2):131-137.
22. Grave de Peralta M.R., Murray M.M., Michel C.M., Martuzzi R., Gonzalez Andino S.L. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. NeuroImage 2004, 21(2):527-539.
23. Hempel A., Giesel F.L., Garcia Caraballo N.M., Amann M., Meyer H., Wustenberg T., et al. Plasticity of cortical activation related to working memory during training. American Journal of Psychiatry 2004, 161(4):745-747.
24. Jackson G.M., Swainson R., Cunnington R., Jackson S.R. ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism Language Cognition 2001, 4(2):169-178.
25. Jonides J., Smith E.E., Marshuetz C., Koeppe R.A., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95(14):8410-8413.
26. Kelly A.M., Garavan H. Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(8):1089-1102.
27. Kelly C., Foxe J.J., Garavan H. Patterns of normal human brain plasticity after practice and their implications for neurorehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006, 87(12):S20-S29.
28. Lehmann D. Principles of spatial analysis. Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals 1987, vol. 1:309-354. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.S. Gevins, A. Remond (Eds.).
29. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980, 48(6):609-621.
30. Leotti L.A., Wager T.D. Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36(2):430-447.
31. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 1984, 91(3):295-327.
32. Lucka F., Pursiainen S., Burger M., Wolters C.H. Hierarchical Bayesian inference for the EEG inverse problem using realistic FE head models: Depth localization and source separation for focal primary currents. NeuroImage 2012, 61(4):1364-1382.
33. Manuel A.L., Grivel J., Bernasconi F., Murray M.M., Spierer L. Brain dynamics underlying training-induced improvement in suppressing inappropriate action. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(41):13670-13678.
34. Manuel A.L., Bernasconi F., Murray M.M., Spierer L. Spatio-temporal brain dynamics mediating post-error behavioral adjustments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24(6):1331-1343.
35. Michel C.M., Murray M.M., Lantz G., Gonzalez S., Spinelli L., Grave de P.R. EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115(10):2195-2222.
36. Murray M.M., Brunet D., Michel C.M. Topographic ERP analyses: A step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography 2008, 20(4):249-264.
37. Ortiz J.A., Wright B.A. Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill. Experimental Brain Research. 2010 Mar, 201(3):441-451.
38. Overtoom C.C., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N., Kemner C., van der Molen M.W., van E.H., et al. Inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A psychophysiological study of the stop task. Biological Psychiatry 2002, 51(8):668-676.
39. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., Giard M.H., Echallier J.F. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987, 66(1):75-81.
40. Rimmele J., Jolsvai H., Sussman E. Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(5):1136-1147.
41. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Taylor E., Brammer M. Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes. Human Brain Mapping 2007, 28(11):1163-1177.
42. Schmajuk M., Liotti M., Busse L., Woldorff M.G. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(3):384-395.
43. Segalowitz S.J., Wintink A.J., Cudmore L.J. P3 topographical change with task familiarization and task complexity. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 12(3):451-457.
44. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84(2):127-190.
45. Thelen A., Cappe C., Murray M.M. Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning. NeuroImage 2012, 62(3):1478-1488.
46. Tibshirani R., Walther G., Botstein D., Brown P. Cluster validation by prediction strength. Journal of Computational Graphical Statistics 2005, 14:511-528.
47. Turner D.C., Clark L., Dowson J., Robbins T.W., Sahakian B.J. Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry 2004, 55(10):1031-1040.
48. Tzovara A., Murray M.M., Michel C.M., De Lucia M. A tutorial review of electrical neuroimaging from group-average to single-trial event-related potentials. Developmental Neuropsychology 2012, 37(6):518-544.
49. van den Wildenberg W.P., van der Molen M.W., Logan G.D. Reduced response readiness delays stop signal inhibition. Acta Psychologica 2002, 111(2):155-169.
50. van den Wildenberg W.P., van Boxtel G.J., van der Molen M.W., Bosch D.A., Speelman J.D., Brunia C.H. Stimulation of the subthalamic region facilitates the selection and inhibition of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(4):626-636.
51. van der Schoot M., Licht R., Horsley T.M., Sergeant J.A. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2005, 46(4):331-341.
52. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 2008, 137(4):649-672.
53. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Science 2008, 12(12):418-424.
54. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(5):647-661.
55. Verbruggen F., Adams R., Chambers C.D. Proactive motor control reduces monetary risk taking in gambling. Psychological Science 2012, 23(7):805-815.
56. Wessel J.R., Danielmeier C., Morton J.B., Ullsperger M. Surprise and error: Common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(22):7528-7537.
57. Xue G., Poldrack R.A., Aron A.R. Right inferior frontal cortex is involved in inhibiting both manual and vocal responses. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 2006, 32:367.5.
58. Xue G., Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(8):1923-1932.