Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints

NeuroImage

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 527-539

  Grave De Peralta Menendez, Rolando ^a   Murray, Micah M ^a,b   Michel, Christoph M ^a   Martuzzi, Roberto ^b   Gonzalez Andino, Sara L ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biophysical constraints; Distributed source model; ELECTRA; Inverse problem; LAURA; Regularization

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 1242271388     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.051     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arieli A., Shoham D., Hildesheim R., Grinvald A. Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real time optical imaging coupled with single unit recording in the cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;2072-2093.
2. Bablioni F., Bablioni C., Carducci F., Romani G.L., Rossini P.M., Angelone L.M., Cincotti F. Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study. NeuroImage. 19:2003;1-15.
3. Ben-Israel A., Greville T.N.E. Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications. 1974;Wiley, New York.
4. Bertero M., De Mol C., Pike E.R. Linear inverse problems with discrete data: I. general formulation and singular system analysis. Inverse Problems. 1:1985;301-330.
5. Buchner H., Gobbelé R., Wagner F., Fuchs M., Waberski T.D., Beckmann R. Fast visual evoked potential input into human area V5. NeuroReport. 8:1997;2419-2422.
6. Dale A.M., Halgren E., Lewine J.D., Buckner R.L., Fischl B., Marinkovic K., Paulson K.M., Oostendorp T.F., Belliveau J.W., Orrison W., Rosen B.R. Spatiotemporal cortical activation patterns during semantic processing of novel and repeated words as revealed by combined fMRI and MEG. Neuron (Neurotechnique). 26:2000;55-67.
7. Dale A.M., Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5:1993;162-176.
8. Donchin O., Gribova A., Steinberg O., Bergman H., Cardoso de Oliveira S., Vaadia E. Local field potentials related to bimanual movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices. Exp. Brain Res. 140:2001;46-55.
9. Ducommun C.Y., Murray M.M., Thut G., Bellmann A., Viaud-Delmon I., Clarke S., Michel C.M. Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: An ERP mapping study. NeuroImage. 16:2002;76-88.
10. Ffytche D.H., Guy C.N., Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain. 118:1995;1375-1394.
11. Fuchs M., Wagner M., Köhler T., Wischmann H.A. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16:1999;267-295.
12. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L. A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 4:1998;440-448.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L. Distributed source models: standard solutions and new developments. Uhl C. Analysis of Neurophysiological Brain Functioning. 1999;176-201 Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
14. Grave de Peralta Menenedez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L. Comparison of algorithms for the localization of focal sources: evaluation with simulated data and analysis of experimental data. Int. J. Bioelectromagn. 2002;4.
15. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L., Morand S., Michel C.M., Landis T.M. Imaging the electrical activity of the brain: ELECTRA. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1:2000;1-12.
16. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L., Lantz G., Michel C.M., Landis T. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topogr. 14:2001;131-137.
17. Greenblatt R.E. Probabilistic reconstruction of multiple sources in the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems. 9:1993;271-284.
18. Groetch C.W. The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind. 1984;Pitman, Boston.
19. Hämäläinen, M.S., Ilmoniemi, R.J., 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology.
20. Hämäläinen M.S., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasma O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to non invasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65:1993;413-497.
21. Hauk O., Keil A., Elbert T., Müller M.M. Comparison of data transformation procedures to enhance topographical accuracy in time-series analysis of the human EEG. J. Neurosci. Methods. 113:2002;111-122.
22. Khateb A., Michel C.M., Pegna A., O'Dochartaigh S.D., Landis T., Annoni J.M. Processing of semantic categorical and associative relations: an ERP mapping study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 49:2003;41-55.
23. Liu A.K., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum. Brain Mapp. 16:2002;47-62.
24. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 412:2001;150-157.
25. Malmivuo J., Plonsey R. Bioelectromagnetism - Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. 1995;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
26. Menke W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. 1989;Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
27. Michel C.M., Seeck M., Murray M.M. The speed of visual cognition. Hallett M., Phillips L., Schomer D., Massey J.M. Supplement series to Clinical Neurophysiology. 2003;. (in press).
28. Michel C.M., Grave de Peralta R., Lantz G., Gonzalez Andino S.L., Spinelli L., Blanke O., Landis T., Seeck M. Spatio-temporal EEG analysis and distributed source estimation in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16:1999;239-266.
29. Michel C.M., Thut G., Morand S., Khateb A., Pegna A.J., Grave de Peralta R., Gonzalez S., Seeck M., Landis T. Electric source imaging of human cognitive brain functions. A review. Brain Res. Rev. 36:2001;108-118.
30. Mitzdorf U., Singer W. Laminar segregation of afferents to lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: an analysis of current source density. J. Neurophysiol. 40:1977;1227-1244.
31. Morand S., Thut G., Grave de Peralta R., Clarke S., Khateb A., Landis T., Michel C.M. Electrophysiological evidence for fast visual processing through the human koniocellular pathway when stimuli move. Cereb. Cortex. 10:2000;817-825.
32. Mosher J., Mosher R., Leahy F., Lewis P. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatiotemporal MEG data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1992;541-557. (June).
33. Murray M.M., Foxe J.J., Higgins B.A., Javitt D.C., Schroeder C.E. Visuo-spatial neural response interactions in early cortical processing during a simple reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study. Neuropsychologia. 39:2001;828-844.
34. Murray M.M., Wylie G.R., Higgins B.A., Javitt D.C., Scroeder C.E., Foxe J.J. The spatio-temporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;5055-5073.
35. Murray M.M., Michel C.M., Grave de Peralta R., Ortigue S., Brunet D., Gonzalez Andino S., Schnider A. Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 2003;. (in press).
36. Parker R.L. Geophysical Inverse Theory. 1994;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. Pegna A.J., Khateb A., Murray M.M., Landis T., Michel C.M. Neural processing of illusory and real contours revealed by high density ERP mapping. NeuroReport. 13:2002;965-968.
38. Penrose R. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51:1955;406-413.
39. Phillips C., Rugg M.D., Friston K.J. Anatomically informed basis functions for EEG source localization: combining functional and anatomical constraints. NeuroImage. 16:2002;678-695.
40. Plonsey R. The nature of the sources of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields. Biophys. J. 39:1982;309-312.
41. Rao C.R., Mitra S.K. Generalized inverse of matrices and its applications. 1971;Wiley, New York.
42. Roach G.F. Green Functions. Introductory Theory with Applications. 1970;Van Nostrand Reinhold, London.
43. Rorden C., Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav. Neurol. 12:2000;191-200.
44. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32:1987;11-22.
45. Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. Grandori F., Hoke M., Romani G. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. 1990;40-69 Karger, Basel.
46. Schroeder C.E., Mehta A.D., Givre S.J. A spatio-temporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awakw macaque. Cereb. Cortex. 8:1998;575-592.
47. Schwartz D.P., Liu A.K., Bonmassar G., Belliveau J. Comparison of the Linear Estimation and Spatio-temporal Fit Inverse Approaches. Int. J. Bioelectromagn. 3:2001.
48. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S., Poeppel D., Marantz A., Miyashita Y. Application of an MEG eigenspace beamformer to reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15:1999;199-215.
49. Stok C. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:1987;289-296.
50. Thut G., Hauert C.A., Blanke O., Morand S., Seeck M., Gonzalez S.L., Grave de Peralta R., Spinelli L., Khateb A., Landis T., Michel C.M. Visually induced activity in human frontal motor areas during simple visuomotor performance. NeuroReport. 11:2000;2843-2848.
51. Tikhonov A.M., Arsenin V.Y. Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. 1977;Wiley, New York.
52. Uutela K., Hamalainen M., Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage. 10:1999;173-180.