Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 108-115

  Cohen, Jessica R ^a   Poldrack, Russell A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 50949086770     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.108     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AIZENSTEIN, H. J., STENGER, V. A., COCHRAN, J., CLARK, K., JOHNSON, M., NEBES, R. D., & CARTER, C. S. (2004). Regional brain activation during concurrent implicit and explicit sequence learning. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 199-208.
2. BAND, G. P. H., VAN DER MOLEN, M. W., & LOGAN, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica, 112, 105-142.
3. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
4. FLETCHER, P. C., ZAFIRIS, O., FRITH, C. D., HONEY, R. A. E., CORLETT, P. R., ZILLES, K., & FINK, G. R. (2005). On the benefits of not trying: Brain activity and connectivity reflecting the interactions of explicit and implicit sequence learning. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1002-1015.
5. HAZELTINE, E., GRAFTON, S. T., & IVRY, R. (1997). Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding: A PET study. Brain, 120, 123-140.
6. LIEN, M., RUTHRUFF, E., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (2006). Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at once: The search for exceptions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 89-93.
7. LIJFFIJT, M., KENEMANS, J. L., VERBATEN, M. N., & VAN ENGELAND, H. (2005). A meta-analytic review of stopping performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Deficient inhibitory motor control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 216-222.
8. LOGAN, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 189-207.
9. LOGAN, G. D. (1982). On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 778-792.
10. LOGAN, G. D. (1983). Time, information, and the various spans in typewriting. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 197-224). New York: Springer.
11. LOGAN, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 189-240). San Diego: Academic Press.
12. LOGAN, G. D., & COWAN, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
13. NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
14. PASHLER, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. PERRUCHET, P., & AMORIM, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 785-800.
16. POLDRACK, R. A., SABB, F. W., FOERDE, K., TOM, S. M., ASARNOW, R. F., BOOKHEIMER, S. Y., & KNOWLTON, B. J. (2005). The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 5356-5364.
17. POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. RUTHRUFF, E., VAN SELST, M., JOHNSTON, J. C., & REMINGTON, R. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125-142.
19. SALTHOUSE, T. A. (1984). Effects of age and skill in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 345-371.
20. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
21. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
22. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
23. TREISMAN, A., VIEIRA, A., & HAYES, A. (1992). Automaticity and preat-tentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
24. WILLINGHAM, D. B., NISSEN, M. J., & BULLEMER, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
25. WILLINGHAM, D. B., SALIDIS, J., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (2002). Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 1451-1460.
26. ZBRODOFF, N. J., & LOGAN, G. D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 118-130.