Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process

Science

Volumn 317, Issue 5835, 2007, Pages 215-219

  Depue, Brendan E ^a   Curran, Tim ^a   Banich, Marie T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; MEMORY; NEUROLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; THALAMUS; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADULT; AMYGDALA; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CUES; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PULVINAR; REPRESSION; THINKING; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 34447529228     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1139560     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. E. Loftus, Neuroscience 4, 231 (2003).
2. M. C. Anderson et al., Science 303, 232 (2004).
3. M. C. Anderson, C. Green, Nature 410, 366 (2001).
4. J. F. Kihlstrom, Trends Cognit. Sci. 6, 502 (2002).
5. See supporting data on Science Online.
6. B. E. Depue, M. T. Banich, T. Curran, Psychol. Sci. 17, 441 (2006).
7. B. A. van der Kolk, J. A. Burbridge, J. Suzuki, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 821, 99 (1997).
8. B. A. van der Kolk et al., Am. J. Psychiatry 153, 83 (1996).
9. C. Purdon, Behav. Res. Ther. 37, 1029 (1999).
10. P. J. Lang et al., Psychophysiology 35, 199 (1998).
11. E. T. Rolls, Hum. Neurobiol. 3, 209 (1984).
12. S. M. Kosslyn, W. L. Thompson, in The New Cognitive Neurosciences, M. S. Gazzaniga, Ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, ed. 2, 2000), pp. 975-985.
13. C. L. Raye et al., Cortex 43, 135 (2007).
14. A. D. Wagner et al., Neuroimage 14, 1337 (2001).
15. J. L. McGaugh, Science 287, 248 (2000).
16. S. Kastner et al., J. Neurophysiol. 91, 438 (2004).
17. S. Kastner et al., Science 282, 108 (1998).
18. S. Hamann, Trends Cognit. Sci. 5, 394 (2001).
19. E. A. Phelps, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 198 (2004).
20. Our activation of FG has been established to be different (more posterior/medial) from the activation of the fusiform face area (FFA) commonly observed in face perception studies (33).
21. K. Sakai, R. E. Passingham, J. Neurosci. 26, 1211 (2006).
22. N. Ramnani, A. M. Owen, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 184 (2004).
23. P. T. Hertel, G. Calcaterra, Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 12, 484 (2005).
24. R. C. O'Reilly, Science 314, 91 (2006).
25. M. Beauregard, J. Lévesque, P. Bourgouin, J. Neurosci. 21, RC165 (2001).
26. L. L. Jacoby, C. M. Kelley, B. D. McElree, in Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, S. Chaiken, Y. Trope, Eds. (Guilford, New York, 1999), pp. 383-400.
27. H. Garavan, T. J. Ross, E. A. Stein, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 8301 (1999).
28. A. R. Aron, T. W. Robbins, R. A. Poldrack, Trends Cognit. Sci. 8, 170 (2004).
29. K. N. Ochsner et al., J. Cognit. Neurosci. 14, 1215 (2002).
30. N. I. Eisenberger, M. D. Lieberman, K. D. Williams, Science 302, 290 (2003).
31. H. L. Urry et al., J. Neurosci. 26, 4415 (2006).
32. D. Knoch, A. Pascual-Leone, K. Meyer, V. Treyer, E. Fehr, Science 314, 829 (2006); published online 4 October 2006 (10.1126/science. 1129156).
33. I. Gautier et al., Nat. Neurosci. 3, 191 (2000).
34. We thank Y. Du, D. Singel, and R. Freedman for assistance in functional imaging, and three anonymous reviewers for their critical insights. Supported by the Graduate School, the Vice-Chancellor for Research, and the Institute of Cognitive Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder (M.T.B.).