Soft tissue effects of twin block and herbst appliances in patients with class ii division 1 mandibular retrognathy

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 71-81

  Baysal, Asl ^a   Uysal, Tancan ^a,b  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84875737529     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq187     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alves P.F.R, Oliveira A.G 2008 A.comparison of the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects caused by Herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions . World Journal of Orthodontics 9 : e1-e19
2. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth L.R, McNamara J.A Jr. 2000 Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 118 : 159-170
3. Björk A.1972 Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation . Transactions European Orthodontic Society 2 : 61-74
4. Burstone C.1967 Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning . American Journal of Orthodontics 53 : 262-284
5. Clark W.J.2002 Twin Block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopedics, 2nd edn . Mosby, London
6. Dann C, Phillips C, Broder H.L, Tulloch J.F 1995 Self-concept, Class II malocclusion and early treatment . Angle Orthodontist 65 : 411-416
7. Flores-Mir C, Major P.W 2006 Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Twin block appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients: a systematic review . Angle Orthodontist 76 : 876-881
8. Flores-Mir C, Major M.P, Major P.W 2006 Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in Class II division 1: a systematic review . Angle Orthodontist 76 : 712-720
9. Grave K.C, Brown T.1976 Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt . American Journal of Orthodontics 69 : 611-619
10. Hägg U, Pancherz H.1988 Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance . European Journal of Orthodontics 10 : 169-176
11. Holdaway R.A.1983 A.soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.. American Journal of Orthodontics 84 : 1-28
12. Illing H.M, Morris D.O, Lee R.T 1998 A.prospective evaluation of Bass, bionator and Twin-block appliances. Part I: the hard tissues . European Journal of Orthodontics 20 : 501-516
13. Lange W.D, Kalra V, Broadbent B.H, Powers M, Nelson S.1995 Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator . Angle Orthodontist 65 : 423-430
14. Lee R.T, Kyi C.S, Mack G.J.2007 A.controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues . European Journal of Orthodontics 29 : 272-282
15. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H.1987 Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 91 : 143-151
16. McNamara J.A Jr., Brudon W.L.(eds) 2001 Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics . Needham, Michigan
17. Mills C.M, McCulloch K.J.1998 Treatment effects of Twin-block appliance: a cephalometric study . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 114 : 15-24
18. Morris D.O, Illing H.M, Lee R.T 1998 A.prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances: Part II-the soft tissues . European Journal of Orthodontics 20 : 663-684
19. O'Brien K.2006 Is early treatment for Class II malocclusion effective? Results from a randomized controlled trial . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 129 : 64-65
20. O'Brien K.et al. 2003 Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 124 : 128-137
21. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M.1994 Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment . European Journal of Orthodontics 16 : 275-286
22. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J, Shaye R.1991 Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with functional appliance? International Journal of Orthodontics 29 : 38
23. Proffit W.R, Fields H.W 2000 Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd edn . Mosby, St Louis
24. Quintão C, Brunharo H.V P, Menezes R.C, Almeida M.A.O 2006 Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy . European Journal of Orthodontics 28 : 35-41
25. Ruf S, Pancherz H.1999 Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance . Angle Orthodontist 69 : 239-246
26. Ruf S, Pancherz H.2004 Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 126 : 140-152
27. Schaefer A.T, McNamara J.A Jr., Franchi L, Baccetti T.2004 A.cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 126 : 7-15
28. Sharma A.A, Lee R.T 2005 Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 127 : 473-482
29. Singh G.D.2002 Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics . Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 5 : 38-50
30. Singh G.D, Clark W.J.2003 Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finiteelement scaling analysis . European Journal of Orthodontics 25 : 225-230
31. Toth L.R, McNamara J.A 1999 Treatment effects produced by the Twinblock appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 116 : 597-609
32. Tung A.W, Kiyak H.A.1998 Psychological infiuences on the timing of orthodontic treatment . American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics 113 : 29-39
33. Ursi W.J.S, McNamara J.J, Martins D.R, Ursi W.J.S 2000 Evaluation of the soft tissue profile of Class II patients treated with cervical headgear, Frankel's FR-2 and the Herbst appliances . Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortoped Facial 5 : 20-46
34. Varlik S.K, Gültan A, Tümer N.2008 Comparison of the effects of twin block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile . European Journal of Orthodontics 30 : 128-134