|
|
|
Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages
|
|
A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ARTICLE;
CEPHALOMETRY;
CHILD;
CHIN;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING;
HUMAN;
INCISOR;
INSTRUMENTATION;
LIP;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
MANDIBLE;
MAXILLA;
METHODOLOGY;
NOSE;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
PALATE;
PATHOLOGY;
SKULL BASE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADOLESCENT;
CEPHALOMETRY;
CHILD;
CHIN;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INCISOR;
LIP;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II;
MANDIBLE;
MAXILLA;
NOSE;
ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL;
ORTHODONTIC WIRES;
PALATE;
SKULL BASE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
|
EID: 84875735801
PISSN: 15305678
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
